PURPOSE: To provide a microscopic and macroscopic analysis by a clinical, in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) assessment of filtering blebs after glaucoma surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 60 eyes of 48 glaucomatous patients by slit-lamp, IVCM, and AS-OCT examinations. Patients were divided into 2 groups: successful blebs (group 1, 16 patients, 27 eyes) were defined as a one-third reduction in preoperative intraocular pressure without antiglaucoma medications and failed blebs (group 2, 32 patients, 33 eyes) as a less than one-third reduction in preoperative intraocular pressure without therapy. The examinations were performed from 1 to 96 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Diffuse or cystic clinical patterns were indicative for good functionality whereas flat or encapsulation was indicative for poor functionality. When comparing successful with failed blebs, the IVCM analysis showed a greater number (P=0.014), density (P=0.009), and total area of epithelial microcysts (P=0.017) and a lower density of connective tissue (P=0.006). The AS-OCT analysis showed a lower degree of bleb wall reflectivity (P<0.001). A significant correlation was found between the clinical and AS-OCT parameters, particularly for the cystic (100%) and diffuse (74%) patterns. CONCLUSIONS: All IVCM parameters did correlate well with the bleb functionality whereas, among the AS-OCT parameters, only the bleb wall reflectivity was significantly related to the filtering capability. Clinical and AS-OCT bleb classification showed a significant degree of concordance. As a consequence, simultaneous approach by clinical, microscopic, and tomographic assessment improves the clinician's ability in the postsurgery understanding and management of blebs.
PURPOSE: To provide a microscopic and macroscopic analysis by a clinical, in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) assessment of filtering blebs after glaucoma surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 60 eyes of 48 glaucomatouspatients by slit-lamp, IVCM, and AS-OCT examinations. Patients were divided into 2 groups: successful blebs (group 1, 16 patients, 27 eyes) were defined as a one-third reduction in preoperative intraocular pressure without antiglaucoma medications and failed blebs (group 2, 32 patients, 33 eyes) as a less than one-third reduction in preoperative intraocular pressure without therapy. The examinations were performed from 1 to 96 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Diffuse or cystic clinical patterns were indicative for good functionality whereas flat or encapsulation was indicative for poor functionality. When comparing successful with failed blebs, the IVCM analysis showed a greater number (P=0.014), density (P=0.009), and total area of epithelial microcysts (P=0.017) and a lower density of connective tissue (P=0.006). The AS-OCT analysis showed a lower degree of bleb wall reflectivity (P<0.001). A significant correlation was found between the clinical and AS-OCT parameters, particularly for the cystic (100%) and diffuse (74%) patterns. CONCLUSIONS: All IVCM parameters did correlate well with the bleb functionality whereas, among the AS-OCT parameters, only the bleb wall reflectivity was significantly related to the filtering capability. Clinical and AS-OCT bleb classification showed a significant degree of concordance. As a consequence, simultaneous approach by clinical, microscopic, and tomographic assessment improves the clinician's ability in the postsurgery understanding and management of blebs.
Authors: Miguel A Teus; Javier Paz Moreno-Arrones; Beatriz Castaño; Miguel A Castejon; Gema Bolivar Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Silvio DI Staso; Luca Agnifili; Sara Cecannecchia; Angela DI Gregorio; Marco Ciancaglini Journal: In Vivo Date: 2018 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Engin Bilge Ozgurhan; Necip Kara; Ercument Bozkurt; Baran Gencer; Alper Agca; Zeynep Alkin; Ahmet Demirok Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-06-20 Impact factor: 3.411