| Literature DB >> 31324172 |
Utako Tsutsumi-Kuroda1, Sachi Kojima1, Ayako Fukushima1, Kei-Ichi Nakashima1, Keiichiro Iwao1, Hidenobu Tanihara1, Toshihiro Inoue2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The object of this study is to investigate the effect of early bleb parameters measured by three-dimensional anterior-segment optical coherence tomography on the surgical success of trabeculectomy.Entities:
Keywords: Anterior segment OCT; Filtration opening; Glaucoma; Surgical success; Trabeculectomy
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31324172 PMCID: PMC6642551 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-019-1159-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Fig. 1a Schematic description of a triangle scleral flap in the filtering bleb, and the width of filtration opening (blue box). b-d. An OCT image of the filtering bleb in the C-scan image showing a triangle scleral flap (b), and in the horizontal image (c, d). The red and blue lines indicate the horizontal and vertical axes, respectively. The yellow line represents the z-axis for C-scan image (b). The cross points of the colored lines indicate filtration opening
Demographic characteristics of patients
| Number of eyes | 45 |
| Mean age ± SD (years) | 64.3 ± 11.7 |
| Gender (male/female) | 33/12 |
| Mean follow-up period ± SD (months) | 37.0 ± 15.9 |
| Design of conjunctival flap (FB/LB) | 26/19 |
| Mean IOP ± SD (mmHg) | 28.7 ± 8.2 |
| Cause of glaucoma | |
| EXG (%) | 19 (42.0) |
| POAG (%) | 17 (37.8) |
| NVG (%) | 4 (8.9) |
| UG (%) | 4 (8.9) |
| FAP (%) | 1 (2.2) |
| History of prior intraocular surgery | |
| Cataract surgery (%) | 17 (37.8) |
| Trabeculectomy (fornix-based) (%) | 7 (15.6) |
| Vitrectomy (%) | 5 (11.1) |
EXG exfoliation glaucoma, FAP familial amyloid polyneuropathy, FB fornix-based, IOP intraocular pressure, LB limbal-based, NVG neovascular glaucoma, POAG primary open angle glaucoma, SD standard deviation, UG uveitic glaucoma
P values calculated by univariable analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model for the surgical success
| Parameter | Complete successa | Qualified successa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 15 mmHg | < 18 mmHg | < 21 mmHg | < 15 mmHg | < 18 mmHg | < 21 mmHg | |
| Total bleb height | 0.8017 | 0.6070 | 0.6100 | 0.5359 | 0.6149 | 0.3480 |
| Fluid-filled cavity height | 0.2553 | 0.7886 | 0.9244 | 0.1331 | 0.7217 | 0.7299 |
| Bleb wall thickness | 0.6797 | 0.6182 | 0.4898 | 0.1281 | 0.6871 | 0.4319 |
| Bleb wall intensity | 0.4804 | 0.8153 | 0.9750 | 0.1281 | 0.5751 | 0.7725 |
| Distance from scleral-flap top to filtration opening | 0.3486 | 0.1339 | 0.1965 | 0.1870 | 0.1741 | 0.1057 |
| Width of filtration openings | 0.0143* | 0.0272* | 0.0149* | 0.0029** | 0.0410* | 0.0465* |
| Age | 0.6705 | 0.8872 | 0.8876 | 0.5536 | 0.8018 | 0.7674 |
| Male | 0.5002 | 0.9088 | 0.9285 | 0.7957 | 0.8828 | 0.8546 |
| Preoperative IOP | 0.1032 | 0.0934 | 0.1275 | 0.0763 | 0.0725 | 0.1783 |
| Pseudophakia | 0.1956 | 0.5105 | 0.3705 | 0.9507 | 0.5347 | 0.7422 |
| Design of scleral flap (LB/FB) | 0.2807 | 0.6126 | 0.4688 | 0.8881 | 0.5872 | 0.5499 |
aSurgical failure was defined as an IOP value ≥21 mmHg, ≥ 18 mmHg, or ≥ 15 mmHg with (qualified success) or without (complete success) the use of topical ocular hypotensive medication(s). Complete failure was defined as additional glaucoma surgeries required, hypotony less than 4 mmHg and visual loss. EXG exfoliation glaucoma, FB fornix-based, IOP intraocular pressure, LB limbal-based. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
P values calculated by multivariable analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model for the surgical success
| Parameter | Complete successa | Qualified successa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 15 mmHg | < 18 mmHg | < 21 mmHg | < 15 mmHg | < 18 mmHg | < 21 mmHg | |
| Width of filtration openings | – | 0.0105* | – | 0.0081** | 0.0134* | – |
| Preoperative IOP | – | 0.0512 | – | 0.0157* | 0.0345* | – |
aSurgical failure was defined as an IOP value ≥21 mmHg, ≥ 18 mmHg, or ≥ 15 mmHg with (qualified success) or without (complete success) the use of topical ocular hypotensive medication(s). Complete failure was defined as additional glaucoma surgeries required, hypotony less than 4 mmHg and visual loss. Parameters which had potential to be prognostic factor by univariable analysis (P < 0.10) were examined. IOP intraocular pressure. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
Fig. 2Kaplan-Meier survival plots of groups according to the width of the filtration openings on the scleral flap: eyes with filtration opening of > 1.78 mm, the median value of the patients (22 patients, solid line), and eyes with filtration opening of = < 1.78 mm (23 patients, dotted line). The y-axis indicates the success ratio (%), and the x-axis indicates the number of days after trabeculectomy
Number at risk by time in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis
| Time (day) | 0 | 100 | 200 | 300 | 400 | 500 |
| Wide opening | 23 | 16 | 15 | 12 | 9 | 8 |
| Narrow opening | 22 | 20 | 19 | 18 | 16 | 13 |
Fig. 3a Typical OCT images of the successful bleb with wide filtration opening at 2 weeks after trabeculectomy. The red and blue lines represent the horizontal and vertical axes, respectively. The yellow line indicates the z-axis of the data for C-scan images. The cross points of the colored lines show filtration openings, that continued to neighboring horizontal sections (not shown). IOP was 10 mmHg at 1 year after trabeculectomy without additional surgery or medication. b Typical OCT images of the failing bleb with no detectable filtration opening at 2 weeks after trabeculectomy. This case required needling bleb revision at 2 weeks after trabeculectomy