Literature DB >> 31985827

Physical performance of a long axial field-of-view PET scanner prototype with sparse rings configuration: A Monte Carlo simulation study.

Sara A Zein1, Nicolas A Karakatsanis1, Mohammad Issa2, Amin A Haj-Ali2, Sadek A Nehmeh1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a growing interest in extending the axial fields-of-view (AFOV) of PET scanners. One major limitation for the widespread clinical adoption of such systems is the multifold increase in the associated material costs. In this study, we propose a cost-effective solution to extend the PET AFOV using a sparse detector rings configuration. The corresponding physical performance was validated using Monte Carlo simulations.
METHODS: Monte Carlo model of the Siemens BiographTM mCT PET/CT, with a 21.8 cm AFOV and a set of compact rings of LSO crystals was developed as a gold standard. The mCT configuration was then modified by interleaving the LSO crystals in the axial direction within each detector block with 4 mm physical gaps (equivalent to the LSO crystal axial dimension) thus extending the AFOV to 43.6 cm (Ex-mCT). The physical performances of the two MC models were assessed and then compared using NEMA NU 2-2007 standards.
RESULTS: Ex-mCT showed <0.2 mm difference in transaxial spatial resolution, and, 0.8 mm and 0.3 mm deterioration in axial spatial resolution, compared to the mCT, at 1 and 10 cm off-center of the transaxial field-of-view respectively. The system sensitivities for the mCT and Ex-mCT models were 9.4 ± 0.2 and 10.75 ± 0.2 cps/kBq respectively. The higher sensitivity of Ex-mCT was due to four additional detector rings required to double the mCT AFOV. PET images of the NEMA Image Quality (IQ) phantom showed no artifacts due to detector rings sparsity, and all spheres were visible in both configurations. Ex-mCT achieved percent contrast recoveries within 5.6% of those of the mCT for all spheres and a maximum of 36% higher background variability at the center of the AFOV. The Ex-mCT, however, showed a more uniform noise distribution over an axial range of almost twice the length of the mCT AFOV.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the proposed sparse detector-ring configuration, the AFOV of current generation PET systems can be doubled while maintaining the original number and volume of detector crystal elements, and without jeopardizing the system's overall physical performance. Despite an increase in the noise level, the Ex-mCT exhibited an improved noise uniformity.
© 2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ex-mCT; Monte Carlo; PET; extended axial field-of-view; sparse PET

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31985827     DOI: 10.1002/mp.14046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

Review 1.  Scanner Design Considerations for Long Axial Field-of-View PET Systems.

Authors:  Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2020-11-05

2.  The potential of a medium-cost long axial FOV PET system for nuclear medicine departments.

Authors:  Stefaan Vandenberghe; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Maya Abi Akl; Jens Maebe; Suleman Surti; Rudi A Dierckx; Daniel A Pryma; Sadek A Nehmeh; Othmane Bouhali; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Quantifying bias and precision of kinetic parameter estimation on the PennPET Explorer, a long axial field-of-view scanner.

Authors:  Varsha Viswanath; Austin R Pantel; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Robert Doot; Mark Muzi; David A Mankoff; Joel S Karp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-09-02

Review 4.  Kinetic modeling and parametric imaging with dynamic PET for oncological applications: general considerations, current clinical applications, and future perspectives.

Authors:  Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; Leyun Pan; Christos Sachpekidis
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Performance Characteristics of Long Axial Field-of-View PET Scanners with Axial Gaps.

Authors:  Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Varsha Viswanath; Matthew E Werner; Joel S Karp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-09-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.