Literature DB >> 34122757

Assessment of Limb Alignment and Component Placement After All Burr Robotic-Assisted TKA.

Mukesh Laddha1, Sahu Gaurav2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: All burr robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (R-TKA) is the new way of doing TKA without conventional jigs and saw. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of limb alignment and component placement after R-TKA. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This is the prospective study of 63 patients who underwent R-TKA between March and October 2019. Standing scanogram and AP/lateral radiograph were done on day of discharge, 5th day after surgery to calculate limb alignment and component placement angles in coronal and sagittal plane. Deformity correction Bone Ninja software had been used to calculate all this angles.
RESULTS: Mean difference between robotic achieved and postoperative limb alignment was 1.24°. Mean difference between planned and achieved component placement in coronal and sagittal plane for tibia was 0.33° and 0.66° and for femur was 0.62° and 0.30°, respectively. Posterior condylar offset difference was 0.03. As per planned by Navio software, R-TKA had reduced the overall outlier of coronal limb alignment from 3° to less than 1.2° and component placement malposition to less than 1° in coronal and sagittal plane.
CONCLUSION: R-TKA provides near perfect limb alignment and near accurate femoral/tibial component placement as planned in both coronal and sagittal plane. Posterior condylar offset was also perfectly maintained. R-TKA had reduced the overall outlier of coronal limb alignment from 3° to less than 1.2° and component placement malposition to less than 1° in coronal and sagittal plane. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Component placement; Limb alignment; PCO; Robotic TKA; TKA

Year:  2020        PMID: 34122757      PMCID: PMC8149507          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00269-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  34 in total

1.  Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol).

Authors:  S K Chauhan; G W Clark; S Lloyd; R G Scott; W Breidahl; J M Sikorski
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-08

2.  Posterior tilting of the tibial component decreases femoral rollback in posterior-substituting knee replacement: a computer simulation study.

Authors:  S J Piazza; S L Delp; S D Stulberg; S H Stern
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  No difference in accuracy between pinless and conventional computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C Baier; G Maderbacher; H R Springorum; F Zeman; W Fitz; J Schaumburger; J Grifka; J Beckmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Polyethylene wear and variations in knee kinematics.

Authors:  D D D'Lima; J C Hermida; P C Chen; C W Colwell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R C Wasielewski; J O Galante; R M Leighty; R N Natarajan; A G Rosenberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?

Authors:  Peter F Sharkey; William J Hozack; Richard H Rothman; Shani Shastri; Sidney M Jacoby
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Mechanical, Anatomical, and Kinematic Axis in TKA: Concepts and Practical Applications.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Cherian; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Samik Banerjee; Julio J Jauregui; Kimona Issa; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-06

8.  Neutral mechanical alignment: a requirement for successful TKA: opposes.

Authors:  Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 1.390

9.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; Bert M Chesworth; Aileen M Davis; Nizar N Mahomed; Kory D J Charron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Causes and predictors of patient's dissatisfaction after uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tae Kyun Kim; Chong Bum Chang; Yeon Gwi Kang; Sung Ju Kim; Sang Cheol Seong
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of robotic systems for total knee arthroplasty, each system must be assessed for its own value: a systematic review of clinical evidence and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hannes Vermue; Cécile Batailler; Paul Monk; Fares Haddad; Thomas Luyckx; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 2.928

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.