Literature DB >> 19844772

Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?

Robert B Bourne1, Bert M Chesworth, Aileen M Davis, Nizar N Mahomed, Kory D J Charron.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Despite substantial advances in primary TKA, numerous studies using historic TKA implants suggest only 82% to 89% of primary TKA patients are satisfied. We reexamined this issue to determine if contemporary TKA implants might be associated with improved patient satisfaction. We performed a cross-sectional study of patient satisfaction after 1703 primary TKAs performed in the province of Ontario. Our data confirmed that approximately one in five (19%) primary TKA patients were not satisfied with the outcome. Satisfaction with pain relief varied from 72-86% and with function from 70-84% for specific activities of daily living. The strongest predictors of patient dissatisfaction after primary TKA were expectations not met (10.7x greater risk), a low 1-year WOMAC (2.5x greater risk), preoperative pain at rest (2.4x greater risk) and a postoperative complication requiring hospital readmission (1.9x greater risk). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19844772      PMCID: PMC2795819          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  21 in total

1.  Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR/TKR surgery.

Authors:  Bert M Chesworth; Nizar N Mahomed; Robert B Bourne; Aileen M Davis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Health-related quality of life after knee replacement.

Authors:  G Hawker; J Wright; P Coyte; J Paul; R Dittus; R Croxford; B Katz; C Bombardier; D Heck; D Freund
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philip C Noble; Michael A Conditt; Karon F Cook; Kenneth B Mathis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75.

Authors:  J G Anderson; R L Wixson; D Tsai; S D Stulberg; R W Chang
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 6.  Quality of life: patients and doctors don't always agree: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A J Janse; R J B J Gemke; C S P M Uiterwaal; I van der Tweel; J L L Kimpen; G Sinnema
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Influence of patient factors on TKA outcomes at 5 to 11 years followup.

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; Richard W McCalden; Steven J MacDonald; Lipalo Mokete; Jeff Guerin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Total knee replacement: is it really an effective procedure for all?

Authors:  V Wylde; P Dieppe; S Hewlett; I D Learmonth
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Patient-reported outcomes after fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial using the Kinemax total knee replacement.

Authors:  V Wylde; I Learmonth; A Potter; K Bettinson; E Lingard
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-09

10.  Patient outcomes after knee replacement.

Authors:  D A Heck; R L Robinson; C M Partridge; R M Lubitz; D A Freund
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  532 in total

1.  Variability of the location of the tibial tubercle affects the rotational alignment of the tibial component in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen M Howell; Justin Chen; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The 2012 Mark Coventry award: a retrieval analysis of high flexion versus posterior-stabilized tibial inserts.

Authors:  Nicholas R Paterson; Matthew G Teeter; Steven J MacDonald; Richard W McCalden; Douglas D R Naudie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  What is the evidence for total knee arthroplasty in young patients?: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  James A Keeney; Selena Eunice; Gail Pashos; Rick W Wright; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Total knee arthroplasty 2010.

Authors:  Roland Becker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Not the Last Word: Choosing Wisely.

Authors:  Joseph Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Meeting patient expectations and ensuring satisfaction in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-11

7.  Assessment of patient-specific instrumentation precision through bone resection measurements.

Authors:  F Zambianchi; A Colombelli; V Digennaro; A Marcovigi; R Mugnai; F Fiacchi; D Sandoni; A Belluati; F Catani
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  In vivo loss of cement-bone interlock reduces fixation strength in total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Jacklyn R Goodheart; Mark A Miller; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  The KSS 2011 reflects symptoms, physical activities, and radiographic grades in a Japanese population.

Authors:  Naoya Taniguchi; Shuichi Matsuda; Takahisa Kawaguchi; Yasuharu Tabara; Tome Ikezoe; Tadao Tsuboyama; Noriaki Ichihashi; Takeo Nakayama; Fumihiko Matsuda; Hiromu Ito
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Effect of employment status on length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission and patient reported outcomes after spine surgery.

Authors:  Owoicho Adogwa; Aladine A Elsamadicy; Jared Fialkoff; Ankit I Mehta; Raul A Vasquez; Joseph Cheng; Isaac O Karikari; Carlos A Bagley
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.