Literature DB >> 22460688

The effects of syntactic complexity on processing sentences in noise.

Rebecca Carroll1, Esther Ruigendijk.   

Abstract

This paper discusses the influence of stationary (non-fluctuating) noise on processing and understanding of sentences, which vary in their syntactic complexity (with the factors canonicity, embedding, ambiguity). It presents data from two RT-studies with 44 participants testing processing of German sentences in silence and in noise. Results show a stronger impact of noise on the processing of structurally difficult than on syntactically simpler parts of the sentence. This may be explained by a combination of decreased acoustical information and an increased strain on cognitive resources, such as working memory or attention, which is caused by noise. The noise effect for embedded sentences is less than for non-embedded sentences, which may be explained by a benefit from prosodic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22460688     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-012-9213-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  32 in total

Review 1.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  D Caplan; G S Waters
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise.

Authors:  Kirsten Wagener; Jane Lignel Josvassen; Regitze Ardenkjaer
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  The effect of background noise on P300 to suprathreshold stimuli.

Authors:  Dean F Salisbury; Massimo A Desantis; Martha E Shenton; Robert W McCarley
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Memory-load interference in syntactic processing.

Authors:  Peter C Gordon; Randall Hendrick; William H Levine
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

Review 5.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  How does linguistic complexity influence intelligibility in a German audiometric sentence intelligibility test?

Authors:  Verena Uslar; Esther Ruigendijk; Cornelia Hamann; Thomas Brand; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment.

Authors:  B Kollmeier; M Wesselkamp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition.

Authors:  A Boothroyd; S Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs.

Authors:  L P Shapiro; E Zurif; J Grimshaw
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-12

10.  On-line sensitivity to subject-verb agreement violations in Broca's aphasics: the role of syntactic complexity and time.

Authors:  H J Haarmann; H H Kolk
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.381

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Speech audiometry, speech perception, and cognitive functions : English version.

Authors:  H Meister
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  [Speech audiometry, speech perception and cognitive functions. German version].

Authors:  H Meister
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  An eye-tracking paradigm for analyzing the processing time of sentences with different linguistic complexities.

Authors:  Dorothea Wendt; Thomas Brand; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Linguistic Factors Influencing Speech Audiometric Assessment.

Authors:  Martine Coene; Stefanie Krijger; Matthias Meeuws; Geert De Ceulaer; Paul J Govaerts
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparing Eye Tracking with Electrooculography for Measuring Individual Sentence Comprehension Duration.

Authors:  Jana Annina Müller; Dorothea Wendt; Birger Kollmeier; Thomas Brand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of age-related hearing loss and hearing aid experience on sentence processing.

Authors:  Margreet Vogelzang; Christiane M Thiel; Stephanie Rosemann; Jochem W Rieger; Esther Ruigendijk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  How hearing impairment affects sentence comprehension: using eye fixations to investigate the duration of speech processing.

Authors:  Dorothea Wendt; Birger Kollmeier; Thomas Brand
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Toward a taxonomic model of attention in effortful listening.

Authors:  Daniel J Strauss; Alexander L Francis
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.282

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.