| Literature DB >> 33809909 |
Yun Wang1,2,3,4, Ge Liu1,2,4, Rui Liu1,2,4, Maosheng Wei1,2,3,4, Jinxiang Zhang5, Chaomin Sun1,2,4.
Abstract
The prognosis ofEntities:
Keywords: FGF19-FGFR4 signaling; antitumor; cell adhesion; cell growth; exopolysaccharide
Year: 2021 PMID: 33809909 PMCID: PMC8004136 DOI: 10.3390/md19030171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Purification and composition identification of EPS364. (A) The chromatograph profile of the crude polysaccharide EPS364 on a DEAE Sepharose Fast Flow column eluted with a linear gradient of NaCl aqueous solutions (0–1.0 M) at a flow rate of 2.0 mL/min. (B) The elution profile of EPS364 on a Sephadex G-100 column eluted with ultrapure water at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. (C) UV spectrum of EPS364 detected by a NanoPhotometer® spectrophotometer. (D) HPGPC (high-performance gel permeation chromatography) profile of EPS364. (E) The monosaccharide composition of EPS364. Abbreviations: Man, mannose; GlcN, glucosamine; Rha, rhamnose; GlcA, gluconic acid; GalA, galacturonic acid; GalN, galactosamine; Glc, glucose; Gal, galactose; Xyl, xylose and Ara, arabinose.
Figure 2Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum of polysaccharide EPS364.
Figure 3SEM analysis of EPS364 with amplification of 1000× (A), 1700× (B) and 3000× (C). (D) Energy-dispersive spectrum (EDS) analysis of EPS364. (E) Atomic proportion of EPS364 detected by EDS.
Figure 4EPS364 inhibited Huh7.5 cells proliferation and adhesion. (A) Cell viability after different concentrations of the EPS364 (0–4 mg/mL) treatment for 48 h detected by MTT (3-(4,5)-dimethylthiahiazo (-z-y1)-3,5-di-phenytetrazoliumromide) assay. (B) Huh7.5 cell viability after EPS364 treatment (0.5 mg/mL) for different times (0–72 h) detected by the MTT method. (C) The cell morphology after EPS364 treatment for 12 h. (a) HL-7702 cell morphology observed by inverted-phase contrast microscope, (b) HL-7702 cell morphology observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM), (c) Huh7.5 cell morphology observed by inverted-phase contrast microscope and (d) Huh7.5 cell morphology observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The cell viability assays were performed in three dependent experiments. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 versus control.
Figure 5EPS364 induced apoptosis, the loss of the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in Huh7.5 cells. After incubation with or without the EPS364 treatment (2 mg/mL) for 12 h, Huh7.5 cells were stained by Annexin V-FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate) and PI (propidium iodide) and detected by a flow cytometry. (A) Representative dot plots of Annexin V/PI staining. (B) Column bar graph of apoptotic cells. (C) EPS364 induced the loss of the MMP in Huh7.5 cells with 12 h of treatment. (D) EPS364 induced the generation of ROS in Huh7.5 cells with 12 h of treatment. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 versus the control.
Figure 6Proteomic analysis of Huh7.5 cells treated with EPS364 for 12 h. (A) KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) enrichment of the downregulated pathways in EPS364-treated cells. The cell adhesion molecules and extracellular matrix (ECM)-receptor interaction molecules were significantly downregulated in EPS364-treated cells. (B) Heatmap showing the representative proteins related to cancer cell growth, adhesion and the FGF19-FGFR4 signaling pathway that were downregulated in the EPS364-treated group. Abbreviations: FGFR4, fibroblast growth factor receptor 4; KLB, β-klotho; CTNNB1, β-catenin; ALCAM, activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule; ICAM1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and AFP, α-fetoprotein.
Figure 7Expression and interaction assays of proteins that were significantly downregulated by the treatment of EPS364 for 5 h, as shown in the proteomic results. (A) The relative mRNA levels of different genes related to cancer cell growth, adhesion and the FGF19-FGFR4 signaling pathway were detected by qRT-PCR after different concentrations of the EPS364 (0–1.2 mg/mL) treatment. (B) The interactions of the cancer cell growth, adhesion and FGF19-FGFR4 signaling pathway-related proteins were analyzed by String software. Data are presented as means ± SD of three independent experiments (n = 3). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 versus the EPS364-treated group. Abbreviations: FGFR4, fibroblast growth factor receptor 4; KLB, β-klotho; CTNNB1, β-catenin; ALCAM, activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule; ICAM1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1; AFP, α-fetoprotein; CAV1, caveolin-1; CAV2, caveolin-2; CDH2, N-cadherin and FGF19, fibroblast growth factor 19.
Figure 8Proposed antitumor model of EPS364. EPS364 downregulated the FGF19-FGFR4 signaling axis, which induced the collapse of the MMP and generation of ROS. FGF19-FGFR4 signaling downregulated the downstream molecules, such as CTNNB1, ICAM1, CDH2 and ALCAM. Consequently, EPS364 induced apoptosis and inhibited cell growth and adhesion.