| Literature DB >> 33808643 |
Letícia Tiburcio Ferreira1, Joyce V B Borba1,2, José Teófilo Moreira-Filho2, Aline Rimoldi1, Carolina Horta Andrade2, Fabio Trindade Maranhão Costa1.
Abstract
With about 400,000 annual deaths worldwide, malaria remains a public health burden in tropical and subtropical areas, especially in low-income countries. Selection of drug-resistant Plasmodium strains has driven the need to explore novel antimalarial compounds with diverse modes of action. In this context, biodiversity has been widely exploited as a resourceful channel of biologically active compounds, as exemplified by antimalarial drugs such as quinine and artemisinin, derived from natural products. Thus, combining a natural product library and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR)-based virtual screening, we have prioritized genuine and derivative natural compounds with potential antimalarial activity prior to in vitro testing. Experimental validation against cultured chloroquine-sensitive and multi-drug-resistant P. falciparum strains confirmed the potent and selective activity of two sesquiterpene lactones (LDT-597 and LDT-598) identified in silico. Quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models predicted absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) parameters for the most promising compound, showing that it presents good physiologically based pharmacokinetic properties both in rats and humans. Altogether, the in vitro parasite growth inhibition results obtained from in silico screened compounds encourage the use of virtual screening campaigns for identification of promising natural compound-based antimalarial molecules.Entities:
Keywords: ADME; Plasmodium falciparum; QSAR; experimental validation; natural products; virtual screening
Year: 2021 PMID: 33808643 PMCID: PMC8003391 DOI: 10.3390/biom11030459
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1General workflow of the virtual screening of natural compound database followed by experimental validation. The following steps were conducted: (1) quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR)-based virtual screening of MolPort natural products and derivatives database and selection of compounds with best predicted antimalarial activity; (2) analysis of structural diversity by clustering; (3) visual inspection; (4) experimental validation against P. falciparum blood stages and mammalian HepG2 cells and (5) quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) models for prediction of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) properties.
Figure 2Virtual screening workflow for the identification of natural compounds and derivatives active against P. falciparum.
Figure 3In vitro growth inhibition of asexual blood stage P. falciparum (3D7) for prioritized natural compounds and derivatives from virtual screening. The inhibitory potential of different compounds was tested at a concentration of 5 μM and the inhibition of parasitemia was measured after 72 hours of incubation. The dashed line represents the cutoff used to highlight the most promising compounds above 70% of inhibition.
The most promising compounds predicted to be active against P. falciparum asexual stages selected by virtual screening.
| Compound Code | 2D Structure | EC50 a (µM) | CC50 b (µM) | In vitro Therapeutic Index c | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HepG2 | |||||
|
| 4.52 ± 0.91 | 3.44 ± 1.30 | 98.59 ± 0 | 21.81 | |
|
| 3.84 ± 1.45 | 2.09 ± 1.17 | 67.04 ± 2.28 | 17.46 | |
|
| 9.09 ± 3.74 | 3.11 ± 0.54 | 17 ± 0 | 1.87 | |
|
| 0.0005 ± 0.00 | 0.0005 ± 0.00 | 18.29 ± 3.51 | 33,870.37 | |
|
| 0.0007 ± 0.00 | 0.0006 ± 0.00 | 25.94 ± 1.13 | 33,299.10 | |
|
| 3.68 ± 1.92 | 2.74 ± 0.78 | 20.96 ± 2.51 | 5.70 | |
|
| 6.61 ± 3.20 | 0.65 ± 0.47 | 21.79 ± 4.16 | 3.30 | |
|
| 5.26 ± 0.52 | 5.65 ± 3.11 | 23.55 ± 1.82 | 4.48 | |
|
| 0.0079 ± 0.00 | 0.147 ± 0.04 | ND | - | |
|
| 0.0016 ± 0.00 | ND | ND | - | |
a EC50: half of the maximum inhibitory concentration in 3D7 and W2 strains and their respective standard deviations; b CC50: half the maximum cytotoxic concentration in HepG2 cells; c SI: Selectivity index calculated from CC50/EC50 (3D7). NP: natural products. ND: not determined. The data derive from at least two independent experiments.
Figure 4Predicted metabolism of compounds LDT-597 and -598 via plasma carboxylesterases predicted using the software BioTransformer.
Figure 5ADME and PBPK multiparametric prediction of LDT-597 using the Detoxie® software (http://insilicall.com/, accessed on 17 December 2020).