Literature DB >> 19929826

3D-QSAR in drug design--a review.

Jitender Verma1, Vijay M Khedkar, Evans C Coutinho.   

Abstract

Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) have been applied for decades in the development of relationships between physicochemical properties of chemical substances and their biological activities to obtain a reliable statistical model for prediction of the activities of new chemical entities. The fundamental principle underlying the formalism is that the difference in structural properties is responsible for the variations in biological activities of the compounds. In the classical QSAR studies, affinities of ligands to their binding sites, inhibition constants, rate constants, and other biological end points, with atomic, group or molecular properties such as lipophilicity, polarizability, electronic and steric properties (Hansch analysis) or with certain structural features (Free-Wilson analysis) have been correlated. However such an approach has only a limited utility for designing a new molecule due to the lack of consideration of the 3D structure of the molecules. 3D-QSAR has emerged as a natural extension to the classical Hansch and Free-Wilson approaches, which exploits the three-dimensional properties of the ligands to predict their biological activities using robust chemometric techniques such as PLS, G/PLS, ANN etc. It has served as a valuable predictive tool in the design of pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals. Although the trial and error factor involved in the development of a new drug cannot be ignored completely, QSAR certainly decreases the number of compounds to be synthesized by facilitating the selection of the most promising candidates. Several success stories of QSAR have attracted the medicinal chemists to investigate the relationships of structural properties with biological activity. This review seeks to provide a bird's eye view of the different 3D-QSAR approaches employed within the current drug discovery community to construct predictive structure-activity relationships and also discusses the limitations that are fundamental to these approaches, as well as those that might be overcome with the improved strategies. The components involved in building a useful 3D-QSAR model are discussed, including the validation techniques available for this purpose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19929826     DOI: 10.2174/156802610790232260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem        ISSN: 1568-0266            Impact factor:   3.295


  112 in total

1.  4D-LQTA-QSAR and docking study on potent Gram-negative specific LpxC inhibitors: a comparison to CoMFA modeling.

Authors:  Jahan B Ghasemi; Reihaneh Safavi-Sohi; Euzébio G Barbosa
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.943

2.  Development and validation of an improved algorithm for overlaying flexible molecules.

Authors:  Robin Taylor; Jason C Cole; David A Cosgrove; Eleanor J Gardiner; Valerie J Gillet; Oliver Korb
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  3D-QSAR AND CONTOUR MAP ANALYSIS OF TARIQUIDAR ANALOGUES AS MULTIDRUG RESISTANCE PROTEIN-1 (MRP1) INHIBITORS.

Authors:  Prathusha Kakarla; Madhuri Inupakutika; Amith R Devireddy; Shravan Kumar Gunda; Thomas Mark Willmon; K C Ranjana; Ugina Shrestha; Indrika Ranaweera; Alberto J Hernandez; Sharla Barr; Manuel F Varela
Journal:  Int J Pharm Sci Res       Date:  2016-02-01

4.  Molecular modelling of quinoline derivatives as telomerase inhibitors through 3D-QSAR, molecular dynamics simulation, and molecular docking techniques.

Authors:  Keerti Vishwakarma; Hardik Bhatt
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 5.  Generative chemistry: drug discovery with deep learning generative models.

Authors:  Yuemin Bian; Xiang-Qun Xie
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 6.  Experimental models in Chagas disease: a review of the methodologies applied for screening compounds against Trypanosoma cruzi.

Authors:  Cristina Fonseca-Berzal; Vicente J Arán; José A Escario; Alicia Gómez-Barrio
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  A combined 3D-QSAR and molecular docking strategy to understand the binding mechanism of (V600E)B-RAF inhibitors.

Authors:  Zaheer Ul-Haq; Uzma Mahmood; Sauleha Reza
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 2.943

8.  Molecular dynamics and integrated pharmacophore-based identification of dual [Formula: see text] inhibitors.

Authors:  Maninder Kaur; Pankaj Kumar Singh; Manjinder Singh; Renu Bahadur; Om Silakari
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.943

Review 9.  A review of mathematical representations of biomolecular data.

Authors:  Duc Duy Nguyen; Zixuan Cang; Guo-Wei Wei
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 10.  Machine learning in chemoinformatics and drug discovery.

Authors:  Yu-Chen Lo; Stefano E Rensi; Wen Torng; Russ B Altman
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 7.851

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.