| Literature DB >> 33807918 |
Maria Pia Adorni1, Nicoletta Ronda2, Franco Bernini2, Francesca Zimetti2.
Abstract
Over the years, the relationship between high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and atherosclerosis, initially highlighted by the Framingham study, has been revealed to be extremely complex, due to the multiple HDL functions involved in atheroprotection. Among them, HDL cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC), the ability of HDL to promote cell cholesterol efflux from cells, has emerged as a better predictor of cardiovascular (CV) risk compared to merely plasma HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. HDL CEC is impaired in many genetic and pathological conditions associated to high CV risk such as dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, endocrine disorders, etc. The present review describes the current knowledge on HDL CEC modifications in these conditions, focusing on the most recent human studies and on genetic and pathophysiologic aspects. In addition, the most relevant strategies possibly modulating HDL CEC, including lifestyle modifications, as well as nutraceutical and pharmacological interventions, will be discussed. The objective of this review is to help understanding whether, from the current evidence, HDL CEC may be considered as a valid biomarker of CV risk and a potential pharmacological target for novel therapeutic approaches.Entities:
Keywords: atherosclerosis; cardiovascular disease; cholesterol efflux capacity; high density lipoprotein; reverse cholesterol transport
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33807918 PMCID: PMC8002038 DOI: 10.3390/cells10030574
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 7.666
Figure 1Mechanisms of cellular cholesterol efflux. This scheme shows the different pathways involved in macrophage cholesterol efflux and the specific high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subclasses acting as cholesterol acceptors. Cholesterol efflux occurs by four independent routes, including aqueous diffusion (AD), scavenger receptor B1 (SR-BI), ATP-binding membrane cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) and G1 (ABCG1). The AD and SR-BI pathways consist of bidirectional flux of cholesterol between mature HDL particles and the cell plasma membrane and, as such, cholesterol transfer is driven by the cholesterol concentration gradient. Furthermore, cholesterol efflux can be unidirectionally and actively transported through the transporter ABCA1 to lipid free apoA-1 or discoidal pre β-HDL or through the transporter ABCG1 to mature HDL particles.
Results of the main cross-sectional studies examining the association between high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) and cardiovascular (CV) risk.
| Cross-Sectional Studies | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Study | Study Population | Main Findings | OD/HR/r and |
| Khera A.V. et al., 2011 [ | 203 healthy volunteers; | HDL CEC was a strong inverse predictor of CAD also after adjustment for HDL-C 1or apoA-I levels 2 | 1 OR: 0.75; |
| Ishikawa T. et al., 2015 [ | 182 patients with and 72 without CAD; | HDL CEC, but not HDL-C or apoA-I levels, was a significant predictor of CAD. | OR: 0.23; |
| Ogura M. et al., 2016 [ | 227 HeFH patients of which 76 had ASCVD | Increased HDL CEC was associated with decreased risk of ASCVD even after the addition of HDL-C level as a covariate and after adjustment for age, sex and traditional CV risk factors | OR: 0.95; |
| Thakkar H. et al., 2020 [ | 150 ACS patients; 110 controls | HDL CEC was associated with a higher OR of ACS even after adjustment for confounding factors. | OR: 0.49; |
| Favari E. et al., 2013 [ | 167 healthy subjects | ABCA1-dependent CEC was inversely correlated with PWV | r = −0.183; |
| Vigna G. B. et al., 2014 [ | 20 subjects with HAL; | ABCG1-CEC was directly correlated with the FMD | r = 0.377; |
| Josefs T. et al., 2020 [ | 574 subjects from CODAM cohort with T2DM and CVD | HDL CEC was not associated with either markers of atherosclerosis cIMT and EnD, nor with CVD or CVE | |
| Li X.M. et al., 2013 [ | Cohort A: Stable Angiographic Case—Control Cohort ( | Higher CEC was paradoxically associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction/stroke1 and major adverse CVE2 | 1 HR: 2.19 |
ASCVD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; ACS: acute coronary syndrome; CAD: coronary artery disease; cIMT: carotid intima-media thickness; CEC: cholesterol efflux capacity; CV: cardiovascular; CVD: CV disease; CVE: CV event; EnD: endothelial dysfunction; FMD: flow mediated dilation; HAL: hyperalphalipoproteinemia HDL: high density lipoprotein; PWV: pulse wave velocity; T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Results of the main longitudinal studies examining the association between HDL CEC and CV risk.
| Longitudinal Studies | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Study | Study Population | Main Findings | OD/HR/r and |
| Rohatgi A. et al., 2014 [ | 2924 subjects free from CVD | HDL CEC was inversely associated with the incidence of CV events after adjustment for traditional risk factors. | OR: 0.33 |
| Saleheen D. et al., 2015 [ | 1745 initially healthy subjects who later developed fatal or non-fatal CHD; 1749 controls | HDL CEC was inversely associated with incidence of CHD events after the adjustment for CV risk factors and HDL-C. | OR: 0.64 |
| Patel P.J. et al., 2013 [ | 23 subjects with CAD and EF < 50%; 46 control subjects without CAD and EF > 55% | Low HDL CEC was a significant risk factors for HF | OR: 2.1 |
| Khera A.V. et al., 2017 [ | 314 subjects with CVD; 314 controls | On-statin HDL CEC was inversely associated with the incidence of CVD 1, although HDL particle number emerged as the strongest predictor 2. | 1 OR: 0.62 |
| Ritsch A. et al., 2015 [ | 2450 healthy subjects undergoing coronary angiography | Inverse correlation between CEC and CV mortality in a fully adjusted model that included traditional CV risk factor. | HR for Q4 vs. Q1: 0.64 |
| Chindhy et al., 2018 [ | 2895 subjects without baseline CVD; 210 of them with baseline CKD | No significant interaction between CEC and CKD on associations with ASCVD 1 and total CVD 2. | 1 HR: 1.30 |
| Javaheri et al., 2016 [ | 35 patients with CAV 1 year after heart transplantation | Reduced CEC was independently associated with disease progression and mortality in CAV patients. | OR: 0.35 |
| Kopecki et al., 2017 [ | 1147 patients with T2DM and undergoing hemodialysis | No association between CEC and CVD mortality 1, cardiac events 2, and all-cause mortality 3. | 1 HR: 0.96 |
| Liu et al., 2016 [ | 1737 patients with CAD | CEC was an independent factor to predict all-cause 1 and CV mortality 2 in patients with CAD | Q4 vs. Q1 |
| Mody et al., 2016 [ | 1972 patients with/without CAD | CEC was inversely associated with ASCVD among subjects with CAC 1, FH 2 and elevated hsCRP 3. | 1 HR: 0.40 |
| Soria-Florido et al., 2020 [ | 167 patients with ACS; 334 controls | CEC was inversely associated with ACS incidence 1 and MI 2. | 1 OR: 0.58 |
| Ebtehaj S. et al., 2019 [ | 351 subjects with CVD developed during follow-up; 354 controls | CEC was significantly associated with the future development of CVD events independently of HDL-C and ApoA-I plasma levels | OR: 0.73 |
| Riggs K.A. et al., 2019 [ | 2643 health subjects with < 65 years | GlycA was directly associated with HDL-C and ApoA-I, while it was inversely correlated with CEC | HR for |
| Annema et al., 2016 [ | 495 patients that underwent renal transplantation | CEC was not associated with future CV mortality 1 or all-cause mortality 2, while it was found to predict graft failure 3. | 1 HR: 1.014 |
| Shea S. et al., 2019 [ | 465 cases with incident CV events; 465 controls | CEC was significantly associated with lower odds of CVD 1, higher CEC was associated with lower risk of incident CHD 2. | 1 OR = 0.82 |
| Garg p.K. et al., 2020 [ | 1458 patients that developed incident clinical or subclinical PAD during 6 years of follow-up | High CEC was not significantly associated with incident clinical PAD 1, or subclinical PAD 2 | 1 HR: 1.25 |
ACS: acute coronary syndrome; ASCVD; atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CAC: coronary artery calcium; CAV: cardiac allograft vasculopathy; CEC: cholesterol efflux capacity; CHD: coronary heart disease; CKD: chronic kidney disease; CV: Cardiovascular; CVD: CV disease; HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; HF: heart failure; hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; MI: myocardial infarction; PAD: peripheral artery disease.