Literature DB >> 23029167

Functional characterization of newly-discovered mutations in human SR-BI.

Alexandra C Chadwick1, Daisy Sahoo.   

Abstract

In rodents, SR-BI has been firmly established as a physiologically relevant HDL receptor that mediates removal of HDL-cholesteryl esters (CE). However, its role in human lipoprotein metabolism is less defined. Recently, two unique point mutations in human SR-BI - S112F or T175A - were identified in subjects with high HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. We hypothesized that mutation of these conserved residues would compromise the cholesterol-transport functions of SR-BI. To test this hypothesis, S112F- and T175A-SR-BI were generated by site-directed mutagenesis. Cell surface expression was confirmed for both mutant receptors in COS-7 cells upon transient transfection, albeit at lower levels for T175A-SR-BI. Both mutant receptors displayed defective HDL binding, selective uptake of HDL-CE and release of free cholesterol (FC) from cells to HDL. Mutant receptors were also unable to re-organize plasma membrane pools of FC. While these impaired functions were independent of receptor oligomerization, inability of T175A-SR-BI to mediate cholesterol-transport functions could be related to altered N-linked glycosylation status. In conclusion, high HDL-C levels observed in carriers of S112F- or T175A-SR-BI mutant receptors are consistent with the inability of these SR-BI receptors to mediate efficient selective uptake of HDL-CE, and suggest that increased plasma HDL concentrations in these settings may not be associated with lower risk of cardiovascular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23029167      PMCID: PMC3448639          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

The reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) pathway, whereby high density lipoproteins (HDL) transport cholesterol from peripheral tissues to the liver for catabolism [1], is critical for combating coronary artery disease since it prevents the accumulation of excess cholesterol, lipids, and cellular debris, and thus the formation of atherosclerotic plaques on arterial walls [2]. In the last step of RCT, HDL binds to scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI), an 82 kDa glycosylated cell-surface receptor that mediates selective uptake of HDL-cholesteryl esters (CE) into the liver [3], without holo-particle uptake [4]–[6]. SR-BI also stimulates free cholesterol (FC) efflux from peripheral tissues to HDL [7], although its role in stimulating this early step of RCT to decrease macrophage foam cell formation remains controversial [8], [9]. The selective uptake of HDL-CE is only achieved if HDL and SR-BI form a “productive complex”, where the receptor and ligand precisely align to allow CE transfer to occur [10]. Previous studies have validated the importance of SR-BI's extracellular domain in the selective uptake process through use of chimeric receptors [11], [12], epitope tag insertion [13], mutagenesis [14], [15], and blocking antibody directed against the extracellular domain [16]. Further, our recent work demonstrates that hydrophobicity of the N-terminal half of the extracellular domain of SR-BI [15], as well as a specific conformation of the C-terminal half of the extracellular domain held together by disulfide bonds [17], are critical for receptor function. Transgenic overexpression [18]–[20] or hepatic adenoviral-mediated [21], [22] SR-BI cDNA transfer in mice decreased plasma HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and increased cholesterol catabolism and excretion. On the other hand, reduced SR-BI expression or whole-body knock-out of the SR-BI gene resulted in increased plasma HDL-C levels [23]. Although these studies have firmly established SR-BI as a physiologically relevant HDL receptor in rodents, its role in human lipoprotein metabolism is less defined. The human homologue of SR-BI, also known as CLA-1 (CD36 and LIMPII analogous-1), serves as a receptor for HDL and mediates HDL-CE selective uptake [24]. Similar to rodents, it is also most abundantly expressed in the liver and steroidogenic tissues [24]. Human SR-BI variants are associated with changes in HDL-cholesterol [25], [26] and protein levels in peripheral tissues [27]. Most recently, two point mutations in human SR-BI — at Ser112 (to Phe) or at Thr175 (to Ala) — were identified in two subjects with high HDL-C levels [28]. As these are highly conserved residues across species, we predicted that SR-BI's function would be compromised. In this study, we characterized the functionality of these SR-BI variants in COS-7 cells to test our hypothesis that high HDL-cholesterol levels in subjects harboring mutations at Ser112 or Thr175 result from the inability of SR-BI to mediate efficient HDL-CE selective uptake.

Methods

Materials

The following antibodies were used: anti-SR-BI specific for the extracellular domain or the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain (Novus Biologicals, Inc., Littleton, CO), anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Millipore, Billerica, MA), peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). Human HDL was purchased from Biomedical Technologies, Inc. [3H]Cholesteryl oleoyl ether (COE) was purchased from American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc (St. Louis, MO). [125I]Sodium iodide and [3H]cholesterol were purchased from Perkin-Elmer. Cholesterol oxidase (Streptomyces), cholesterol, 4-cholesten-3-one, and cholesteryl oleate standards were purchased from Sigma. EZ-Link Sulfo-NHS-LC-biotin was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Rockford, IL). All other reagents were of analytical grade.

Plasmids

The human SR-BI coding region was cloned into the pcDNA3.1 vector (Invitrogen) to produce pcDNA3.1[hSR-BI] (herein referred to as SR-BI). Site-directed mutations at Ser112 (to Phe) or Thr175 (to Ala) were then introduced into pcDNA3.1[hSR-BI]. Cloning, mutagenesis and sequencing were performed by Top Gene Technologies (Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada).

Cell Culture and Transfection

COS-7 cells, maintained in DMEM (Invitrogen) containing 10% calf serum (Invitrogen), 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 units/mL penicillin, 50 µg/mL streptomycin, and 1 mM sodium pyruvate, were transiently transfected with Fugene 6 as previously described [29]. Unless otherwise noted, cellular assays were performed 48 hours post-transfection.

Cell lysis

Transiently-transfected COS-7 cells were washed twice with cold PBS (pH 7.4) and lysed with 1% NP-40 cell lysis buffer containing protease inhibitors. Protein concentrations were determined by the Lowry method as previously described [30].

Cell surface receptor expression

Cell surface biotinylation of SR-BI in transiently-transfected COS-7 cells was performed as previously described [15]. In separate experiments, cell surface expression of SR-BI was verified by flow cytometry as described using FACS Calibur (Flow Cytometry Core, Medical College of Wisconsin) [17].

HDL labeling, cell association of [125I]HDL and uptake of [3H]HDL-COE

HDL was double-labeled with non-hydrolyzable [3H]COE and [125I]dilactitol tyramine as described [29]. Preparations of radiolabeled HDL had an average [3H] specific activity of 220.83 dpm/ng of protein and an average [125I] specific activity of 280.89 dpm/ng of protein. COS-7 cells transiently transfected with empty pcDNA3.1 vector, wild-type or mutant human SR-BI were assayed for cell association of [125I]-HDL and selective uptake of non-hydrolyzable [3H]-COE as previously described [29]. Statistical analysis was determined by one-way ANOVA.

Free cholesterol efflux and cholesterol oxidase sensitivity

Cells transiently transfected with cDNA encoding empty vector, wild-type or mutant human SR-BI were pre-labeled with [3H]cholesterol and assayed for FC release from cells to HDL, or for sensitivity to exogenous cholesterol oxidase at 72-hours or 48- hours post-transfection, respectively, as previously described [13]. Statistical analysis was determined by one-way ANOVA.

SR-BI oligomerization

Cells transiently expressing wild-type and mutant SR-BI were lysed in PBS containing protease inhibitors. SR-BI oligomerization was assessed by 6% PFO-PAGE as previously described [15].

Results

Variable cell surface expression of mutant SR-BI receptors

Ser112 and Thr175 are evolutionarily conserved residues. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we created S112F and T175A point mutations in human SR-BI to test their ability to mediate cholesterol-transport functions. We chose to study SR-BI function in transfected COS-7 cells since they do not have endogenous SR-BI expression (as confirmed by immunoblot and flow cytometry analyses; [31] and data not shown). We used two different methods to assess cell surface expression of both SR-BI mutants. In the first method, biotinylation and immunoblot analysis of COS-7 cell lysates revealed that wild-type and S112F-SR-BI expressed at approximately similar levels at the cell surface. However, T175A-SR-BI expressed more than 50% less than wild-type SR-BI based on band densitometry ( , top panel). Total cell expression of all SR-BI constructs are shown in (middle panel). These observations were mirrored in parallel experiments where flow cytometry analyses also revealed that T175A-SR-BI expressed at much lower levels at the cell surface than wild-type or S112F-SR-BI ( ).
Figure 1

Cell surface expression of wild-type and mutant SR-BI receptors.

(A) COS-7 cells expressing wild-type or mutant SR-BI receptors were assessed for cell surface expression following incubation with NHS-LC-Biotin as described in Materials and Methods. Immunoblot analyses of biotinylated SR-BI at the cell surface (from ∼150 µg of total lysate) (top panel) and in 20 µg of total cell lysate (middle panel) are shown using an antibody directed against the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of SR-BI. GAPDH was detected as a loading control (bottom panel). The numbers above the top panel represent cell surface receptor expression by densitometry analysis (where SR-BI = 100%). Data are representative of 3 independent experiments. (B) Surface expression of wild-type or mutant SR-BI receptors in COS-7 cells was assessed by flow cytometry using an antibody directed against the extracellular domain of SR-BI. Data are expressed as a % of SR-BI expression following subtraction of empty vector values. Data are the average of 12 independent transfections.

Cell surface expression of wild-type and mutant SR-BI receptors.

(A) COS-7 cells expressing wild-type or mutant SR-BI receptors were assessed for cell surface expression following incubation with NHS-LC-Biotin as described in Materials and Methods. Immunoblot analyses of biotinylated SR-BI at the cell surface (from ∼150 µg of total lysate) (top panel) and in 20 µg of total cell lysate (middle panel) are shown using an antibody directed against the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of SR-BI. GAPDH was detected as a loading control (bottom panel). The numbers above the top panel represent cell surface receptor expression by densitometry analysis (where SR-BI = 100%). Data are representative of 3 independent experiments. (B) Surface expression of wild-type or mutant SR-BI receptors in COS-7 cells was assessed by flow cytometry using an antibody directed against the extracellular domain of SR-BI. Data are expressed as a % of SR-BI expression following subtraction of empty vector values. Data are the average of 12 independent transfections.

Mutant receptors displayed an impaired ability to bind HDL and mediate selective uptake of HDL-COE

To determine if mutant SR-BI receptors shared similar functional properties as wild-type SR-BI, we assessed the ability of all SR-BI receptors to bind HDL and mediate the selective uptake of HDL-COE by transiently transfecting COS-7 cells with vectors encoding mutant SR-BI proteins. As shown in , S112F- and T175A-SR-BI displayed significantly lower levels of HDL binding as compared to wild-type SR-BI, even after normalization to cell surface expression based on flow cytometry analyses ( ) from parallel wells from the same experiments. As expected, the inability of both mutants to properly bind HDL translated to an impaired ability to mediate efficient selective uptake of HDL-COE ( ).
Figure 2

Mutant SR-BI receptors display decreased HDL binding and selective uptake of HDL-COE.

COS-7 cells transiently expressing wild-type or mutant SR-BI were incubated with [125I]/[3H]-COE-labeled HDL (10 µg HDL protein/mL). (A) Binding of [125I]HDL and (B) selective uptake of [3H]COE are shown. (C, D) Individual data sets from panels A and B were first normalized to wild-type SR-BI (normalized value = 100%) following subtraction of empty vector values. Next, the corrected HDL binding and HDL-COE values (panels C and D, respectively) were calculated by dividing the normalized values for each receptor by the corresponding value for surface expression (by flow cytometry) from parallel wells within the same experiment. Combined data from six independent experiments, each performed in triplicate, are shown. *p<0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA.

Mutant SR-BI receptors display decreased HDL binding and selective uptake of HDL-COE.

COS-7 cells transiently expressing wild-type or mutant SR-BI were incubated with [125I]/[3H]-COE-labeled HDL (10 µg HDL protein/mL). (A) Binding of [125I]HDL and (B) selective uptake of [3H]COE are shown. (C, D) Individual data sets from panels A and B were first normalized to wild-type SR-BI (normalized value = 100%) following subtraction of empty vector values. Next, the corrected HDL binding and HDL-COE values (panels C and D, respectively) were calculated by dividing the normalized values for each receptor by the corresponding value for surface expression (by flow cytometry) from parallel wells within the same experiment. Combined data from six independent experiments, each performed in triplicate, are shown. *p<0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA.

Mutant receptors display decreased efflux of free cholesterol to HDL

In addition to its role in selective uptake of HDL-CE, SR-BI also plays a role in stimulating the transfer of FC from peripheral cells to acceptor particles such as HDL [3]. We measured the ability of wild-type, S112F- and T175A-SR-BI receptors to efflux FC from pre-labeled COS-7 cells to HDL acceptors. As shown in , both the S112F- and T175A-SR-BI mutant receptors displayed significant decreases in FC efflux as compared to wild-type SR-BI. As expected [32]–[35], little to no wild-type- or mutant SR-BI-mediated FC efflux was observed when lipid-free apoA-I was used as an acceptor (data not shown), thus suggesting that mutant SR-BI receptors affect intracellular and/or membrane pools of FC only in the presence of HDL.
Figure 3

Mutant SR-BI receptors are unable to mediate efflux of free cholesterol from cells to HDL.

COS-7 cells transiently expressing wild-type or mutant SR-BI and pre-labeled with [3H]-cholesterol were incubated with HDL (50 µg/mL) for four hours. Cell and media radioactivity were assessed. Combined data from four independent experiments, each performed in quadruplicate, are shown. *p<0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA.

Mutant SR-BI receptors are unable to mediate efflux of free cholesterol from cells to HDL.

COS-7 cells transiently expressing wild-type or mutant SR-BI and pre-labeled with [3H]-cholesterol were incubated with HDL (50 µg/mL) for four hours. Cell and media radioactivity were assessed. Combined data from four independent experiments, each performed in quadruplicate, are shown. *p<0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA.

Mutant SR-BI receptors are unable to re-organize plasma membrane free cholesterol

Native SR-BI plays a unique role in re-organizing the pools of plasma membrane FC as judged by the enhanced conversion of cholesterol to cholestenone in the presence of exogenous cholesterol oxidase [36]. Quantification of membrane-associated cholestenone following incubation with exogenous cholesterol oxidase revealed that both the S112F- and T175A-SR-BI mutant receptors displayed significantly decreased abilities to re-distribute plasma membrane content of FC as compared to wild-type SR-BI ( ).
Figure 4

Mutant receptors are unable to re-organize plasma membrane pools of FC.

COS-7 cells transiently expressing wild-type or mutant SR-BI and pre-labeled with [3H]-cholesterol were incubated with cholesterol oxidase (0.5 units/mL) for four hours. Lipids were extracted and radioactivity associated with cholestenone was assessed by thin layer chromatography. Combined data from four independent experiments, each performed in quadruplicate, are shown. *p<0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA.

Mutant receptors are unable to re-organize plasma membrane pools of FC.

COS-7 cells transiently expressing wild-type or mutant SR-BI and pre-labeled with [3H]-cholesterol were incubated with cholesterol oxidase (0.5 units/mL) for four hours. Lipids were extracted and radioactivity associated with cholestenone was assessed by thin layer chromatography. Combined data from four independent experiments, each performed in quadruplicate, are shown. *p<0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA.

Defective cholesterol transport functions of SR-BI mutants are not due to changes in their oligomeric status

SR-BI exists as dimers and higher-order oligomers at the plasma membrane [37]–[39]. We and others suggest that SR-BI oligomerization is required for efficient selective uptake of HDL-CE [17], [39], [40], lending support to the notion that SR-BI oligomers form a hydrophobic channel to allow transfer of CE from HDL into the plasma membrane [41]. To determine whether the inability of the S112F- and T175A-SR-BI mutant receptors to mediate proper cholesterol-transport functions was due to their inability to form higher-order oligomers, we assessed their oligomeric status by performing native gel electrophoresis in the presence of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFO), a detergent known to stabilize interactions between oligomers [15], [17], [42]. Based on our analyses, both the S112F- and T175A- mutant receptors were able to form higher order oligomers similar to wild-type SR-BI ( ). These data suggest that the impaired function exhibited by the human SR-BI mutations is independent of the oligomeric status of the receptors.
Figure 5

Mutant receptors maintain their ability to form homo-oligomers.

COS-7 cell lysates transiently expressing wild-type or mutant SR-BI were separated by 6% PFO-PAGE. SR-BI was detected by immunoblot analysis using an antibody directed against the C-terminal domain of the receptor. Data is representative of 4 independent experiments.

Mutant receptors maintain their ability to form homo-oligomers.

COS-7 cell lysates transiently expressing wild-type or mutant SR-BI were separated by 6% PFO-PAGE. SR-BI was detected by immunoblot analysis using an antibody directed against the C-terminal domain of the receptor. Data is representative of 4 independent experiments.

T175A-SR-BI may be impaired due to altered glycosylation patterns

Residue 175 of human SR-BI is part of an N-linked glycosylation sequence (NXS/T) [43], [44] that is highly conserved among species ( ). Mutation of Thr175 to Ala disrupts proper glycosylation of Asn173 as evidenced by a faster mobility on SDS-PAGE as compared to wild-type SR-BI or the S112F-SR-BI mutant receptor ( ). This data suggests that the lower cell surface expression and impaired function of T175A-SR-BI may be the result of an altered glycosylation status of the receptor.
Figure 6

T175A-SR-BI exhibits an altered glycosylation pattern.

(A) The evolutionarily-conserved consensus sequence for N-linked glycosylation is shaded in gray for rabbit (AY_283277), mouse (NM_016741), rat (NP_113729.1), hamster (A53920) and human (NM_005505) SR-BI. The Thr-to-Ala mutation at residue 175 (in bold) disrupts this consensus sequence. (B) COS-7 cell lysates transiently expressing wild-type or mutant SR-BI were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE. SR-BI was detected by immunoblot analysis using an antibody directed against the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of the receptor. Data is representative of 7 independent experiments.

T175A-SR-BI exhibits an altered glycosylation pattern.

(A) The evolutionarily-conserved consensus sequence for N-linked glycosylation is shaded in gray for rabbit (AY_283277), mouse (NM_016741), rat (NP_113729.1), hamster (A53920) and human (NM_005505) SR-BI. The Thr-to-Ala mutation at residue 175 (in bold) disrupts this consensus sequence. (B) COS-7 cell lysates transiently expressing wild-type or mutant SR-BI were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE. SR-BI was detected by immunoblot analysis using an antibody directed against the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of the receptor. Data is representative of 7 independent experiments.

Discussion

The recent identification of two novel missense mutations, S112F and T175A in human SR-BI, prompted us to characterize the functionality of these two variants of SR-BI that underlie elevated HDL-cholesterol levels in humans. Our data revealed that both mutant SR-BI receptors had significantly impaired abilities to bind HDL and mediate the selective uptake of HDL-COE. In addition to displaying defective efflux of FC to HDL, both mutants were also unable to redistribute the plasma membrane pools of FC. The impaired functions of these mutant receptors were not due to changes in oligomeric status. However, decreased cell surface expression and defective functions of T175A-SR-BI could be explained, in part, by an altered glycosylation status as compared to wild-type SR-BI. The accumulation of HDL-cholesterol levels upon deletion of the SR-BI gene in mice [23] strongly suggests that the athero-protective role of SR-BI [45]–[47] is primarily due to its ability to mediate the selective uptake of CE from circulating HDL particles [23], [48], [49]. Based on our in vitro studies, we suggest that inefficient clearance of HDL-C from circulation may explain the 37% increases in HDL-C (with no significant differences in triglycerides, LDL-cholesterol or body mass index) in the two individuals heterozygous for mutations at Ser112 or Thr175 compared to family member controls [28]. As carriers of P297S-SR-BI, the first human SR-BI mutation, displayed similar increases in HDL-C levels [50], our data lend support to the notion that human SR-BI does indeed play a role in hepatic HDL-CE uptake. The athero-protective effects of SR-BI can also be explained, in part, by its role in mediating FC efflux from lipid-laden macrophages to HDL, although this remains controversial [8], [51]–[54]. The reduced ability of S112F- and T175A-SR-BI mutant receptors to efflux FC to HDL mirrors similar trends observed with the P297S-SR-BI mutant receptor in mice [50]. At least in the case of T175A-SR-BI, lower levels of FC efflux may correlate with its lower levels of expression at the cell surface [7], [55]. The inability of both mutant receptors to efficiently mediate cholesterol-transport functions may be associated, in part, with their inability to mediate plasma membrane reorganization of cholesterol, as we have previously observed with other SR-BI receptors harboring mutations in this region of the extracellular domain [15]. More in-depth cholesterol-transport and membrane re-organization studies in macrophage or hepatocyte/hepatoma cell lines warrant further investigation and can provide sharper insight as to how these mutant SR-BI receptors behave when all efflux machinery (i.e. ABCA1 and ABCG1) is present. Mutation of Thr175 to alanine appears to disrupt N-linked glycosylation at the evolutionarily-conserved Asn173 residue as judged by its faster migration as compared to the wild-type or S112F-SR-BI receptors following SDS-PAGE. It was previously demonstrated that N-linked oligosaccharide chains at Asn173 are a critical determinant of cell surface expression and efficient lipid uptake [43]. In support of these observations, reduced cell surface expression of T175-SR-BI similarly correlates with reduced selective HDL-CE uptake efficiency. Although oligosaccharides on glycoproteins have been shown to participate in protein-protein interactions in other systems [56], [57], our analyses indicated that SR-BI oligomerization is not affected by altered glycosylation status. Rather, it is likely that altered glycosylation in T175A-SR-BI and subsequent changes in cell surface expression result from either improper folding in the ER and consequent transport through the Golgi, or decreased receptor stability [43]. Mutation of Ser112 to Phe did not affect cell surface receptor expression, although it did significantly affect HDL-CE selective uptake efficiency. Interestingly, Ser112 lies adjacent to another N-linked glycosylation site (Asn108) that is critical for cell surface expression and function [43]. It is certainly possible that introduction of a large amino acid like phenylalanine could impede the addition of oligosaccharides at Asn108, however an altered glycosylation status S112F-SR-BI was not evident from our immunoblot analyses. Alternatively, proper receptor-ligand interactions may be compromised by (i) altered secondary or tertiary structure of the area surrounding Ser112, (ii) the large nature of the phenyl side chain [58], or (iii) the inability of phenylalanine to participate in potential hydrogen bonding with residues on HDL proteins due to the lack of a hydroxyl group [59]–[61]. Remarkably, both the S112F and T175A point mutations occur in conserved regions of hydrophobicity in the N-terminal half of the extracellular domain of SR-BI. We have previously shown that the hydrophobicity of this region is critical for SR-BI-mediated cholesterol transport function [15] and hypothesized that this region may interact with the plasma membrane as has been reported for other integral membrane proteins [62], [63]. While mutation of Thr to Ala does not impose major effects on hydrophobicity, mutation of Ser to Phe (hydrophobic index of −0.8 and 2.8, respectively [64]) significantly increases the hydrophobicity of the region surrounding residue 112. This leads us to speculate that the region surrounding the Phe residue becomes less solvent-exposed, and perhaps even more ‘buried’ in the membrane, thus preventing key conformational changes that may be required to support efficient selective uptake of HDL-CE. These ideas are currently being investigated. Although human and rodent SR-BI share similar expression patterns, tissue abundance and in vitro receptor activities [3], [24], [38], [65], the role of human SR-BI in hepatic clearance of HDL-CE and its relevance to human physiology has remained a mystery until recently. Not surprisingly, our functional characterization of these two newest human SR-BI mutations raises new questions. Due to inefficient clearance of plasma HDL particles, do carriers of the S112F or T175A mutations possess larger-sized HDL particles, similar to carriers of the P297S mutation [50], and SR-BI knock-out mice [23], [50]? Has the oxidation status and efflux capacity of circulating HDL (i.e. HDL ‘functionality’) been altered? Importantly, carriers of SR-BI mutations at Ser112, Thr175 or Pro297 do not currently show clinical signs of atherosclerosis. Therefore, identification and investigation of additional subjects with the same or new SR-BI mutations will be invaluable as we address the on-going debate as to whether higher HDL-C levels are truly athero-protective [66]–[69]. Answers to these lingering questions are particularly relevant in light of current efforts directed at developing HDL-raising therapeutics to lower cardiovascular risk [70], [71].
  71 in total

1.  Interface-disrupting amino acids establish specificity between T cell receptors and complexes of major histocompatibility complex and peptide.

Authors:  Eric S Huseby; Frances Crawford; Janice White; Philippa Marrack; John W Kappler
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 25.606

2.  The first extracellular loop of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae G protein-coupled receptor Ste2p undergoes a conformational change upon ligand binding.

Authors:  Melinda Hauser; Sarah Kauffman; Byung-Kwon Lee; Fred Naider; Jeffrey M Becker
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.

Authors:  O H LOWRY; N J ROSEBROUGH; A L FARR; R J RANDALL
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Relative contributions of ABCA1 and SR-BI to cholesterol efflux to serum from fibroblasts and macrophages.

Authors:  MyNgan Duong; Heidi L Collins; Weijun Jin; Ilaria Zanotti; Elda Favari; George H Rothblat
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 8.311

5.  Hepatic expression of scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI) is a positive regulator of macrophage reverse cholesterol transport in vivo.

Authors:  YuZhen Zhang; Jaqueline R Da Silva; Muredach Reilly; Jeffrey T Billheimer; George H Rothblat; Daniel J Rader
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Expression of scavenger receptor BI in COS-7 cells alters cholesterol content and distribution.

Authors:  G Kellner-Weibel; M de La Llera-Moya; M A Connelly; G Stoudt; A E Christian; M P Haynes; D L Williams; G H Rothblat
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-01-11       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  A case of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus with a novel missense mutation in the AVPR2 gene.

Authors:  Akira Ashida; Daisuke Yamamoto; Hyogo Nakakura; Hideki Matsumura; Shinichi Uchida; Sei Sasaki; Hiroshi Tamai
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Protease domain glycans affect oligomerization, disulfide bond formation, and stability of the meprin A metalloprotease homo-oligomer.

Authors:  Susan S Ishmael; Faoud T Ishmael; A Daniel Jones; Judith S Bond
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Hepatic scavenger receptor BI promotes rapid clearance of high density lipoprotein free cholesterol and its transport into bile.

Authors:  Y Ji; N Wang; R Ramakrishnan; E Sehayek; D Huszar; J L Breslow; A R Tall
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-11-19       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Relationship between expression levels and atherogenesis in scavenger receptor class B, type I transgenics.

Authors:  Y Ueda; E Gong; L Royer; P N Cooper; O L Francone; E M Rubin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-07-07       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  26 in total

1.  Significance of Cholesterol-Binding Motifs in ABCA1, ABCG1, and SR-B1 Structure.

Authors:  Alexander D Dergunov; Eugeny V Savushkin; Liudmila V Dergunova; Dmitry Y Litvinov
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  Structure of LIMP-2 provides functional insights with implications for SR-BI and CD36.

Authors:  Dante Neculai; Michael Schwake; Mani Ravichandran; Friederike Zunke; Richard F Collins; Judith Peters; Mirela Neculai; Jonathan Plumb; Peter Loppnau; Juan Carlos Pizarro; Alma Seitova; William S Trimble; Paul Saftig; Sergio Grinstein; Sirano Dhe-Paganon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Genetics of HDL-C: a causal link to atherosclerosis?

Authors:  Julian C van Capelleveen; Andrea E Bochem; M Mahdi Motazacker; G Kees Hovingh; John J P Kastelein
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  Structure-function analysis of naturally occurring apolipoprotein A-I L144R, A164S and L178P mutants provides insight on their role on HDL levels and cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Christina Gkolfinopoulou; Faye Soukou; Ioannis Dafnis; Tahsin F Kellici; Despina Sanoudou; Thomas Mavromoustakos; Efstratios Stratikos; Angeliki Chroni
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Procollagen C-endopeptidase Enhancer Protein 2 (PCPE2) Reduces Atherosclerosis in Mice by Enhancing Scavenger Receptor Class B1 (SR-BI)-mediated High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)-Cholesteryl Ester Uptake.

Authors:  Ricquita D Pollard; Christopher N Blesso; Manal Zabalawi; Brian Fulp; Mark Gerelus; Xuewei Zhu; Erica W Lyons; Nebil Nuradin; Omar L Francone; Xiang-An Li; Daisy Sahoo; Michael J Thomas; Mary G Sorci-Thomas
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  High-density lipoprotein receptor SCARB1 is required for carotenoid coloration in birds.

Authors:  Matthew B Toomey; Ricardo J Lopes; Pedro M Araújo; James D Johnson; Małgorzata A Gazda; Sandra Afonso; Paulo G Mota; Rebecca E Koch; Geoffrey E Hill; Joseph C Corbo; Miguel Carneiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  NMR Structure of the C-Terminal Transmembrane Domain of the HDL Receptor, SR-BI, and a Functionally Relevant Leucine Zipper Motif.

Authors:  Alexandra C Chadwick; Davin R Jensen; Paul J Hanson; Philip T Lange; Sarah C Proudfoot; Francis C Peterson; Brian F Volkman; Daisy Sahoo
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Expression, purification and reconstitution of the C-terminal transmembrane domain of scavenger receptor BI into detergent micelles for NMR analysis.

Authors:  Alexandra C Chadwick; Davin R Jensen; Francis C Peterson; Brian F Volkman; Daisy Sahoo
Journal:  Protein Expr Purif       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 1.650

9.  Tryptophan 415 Is Critical for the Cholesterol Transport Functions of Scavenger Receptor BI.

Authors:  Rebecca L Holme; James J Miller; Kay Nicholson; Daisy Sahoo
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 10.  Functional genomics of the human high-density lipoprotein receptor scavenger receptor BI: an old dog with new tricks.

Authors:  Alexandra C Chadwick; Daisy Sahoo
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.