Judith J Prochaska1, Neal L Benowitz. 1. aStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford bDepartments of Medicine and Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Smoking remains the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality. Our review highlights research from 2013 to 2015 on the treatment of cigarette smoking, with a focus on heart patients and cardiovascular outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Seeking to maximize the reach and effectiveness of existing cessation medications, current tobacco control research has demonstrated the safety and efficacy of combination treatment, extended use, reduce-to-quit strategies, and personalized approaches to treatment matching. Further, cytisine has gained interest as a lower-cost strategy for addressing the global tobacco epidemic. On the harm reduction front, snus and electronic nicotine delivery systems are being widely distributed and promoted with major gaps in knowledge of the safety of long-term and dual use. Quitlines, comparable in outcome to in-person treatment, make cessation counseling available on a national scale, though use rates remain relatively low. Employee reward programs are gaining attention given the high costs of tobacco use to employers; sustaining quit rates postpayment, however, has proven challenging. SUMMARY: Evidence-based cessation treatments exist. Broader dissemination, adoption, and implementation are key to addressing the tobacco epidemic. The cardiology team has a professional obligation to advance tobacco control efforts and can play an important role in achieving a smoke-free future.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Smoking remains the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality. Our review highlights research from 2013 to 2015 on the treatment of cigarette smoking, with a focus on heart patients and cardiovascular outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Seeking to maximize the reach and effectiveness of existing cessation medications, current tobacco control research has demonstrated the safety and efficacy of combination treatment, extended use, reduce-to-quit strategies, and personalized approaches to treatment matching. Further, cytisine has gained interest as a lower-cost strategy for addressing the global tobacco epidemic. On the harm reduction front, snus and electronic nicotine delivery systems are being widely distributed and promoted with major gaps in knowledge of the safety of long-term and dual use. Quitlines, comparable in outcome to in-person treatment, make cessation counseling available on a national scale, though use rates remain relatively low. Employee reward programs are gaining attention given the high costs of tobacco use to employers; sustaining quit rates postpayment, however, has proven challenging. SUMMARY: Evidence-based cessation treatments exist. Broader dissemination, adoption, and implementation are key to addressing the tobacco epidemic. The cardiology team has a professional obligation to advance tobacco control efforts and can play an important role in achieving a smoke-free future.
Authors: Robert A Schnoll; Patricia M Goelz; Anna Veluz-Wilkins; Sonja Blazekovic; Lindsay Powers; Frank T Leone; Peter Gariti; E Paul Wileyto; Brian Hitsman Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Lisa Sanderson Cox; Christi A Patten; Raymond S Niaura; Paul A Decker; Nancy Rigotti; David P L Sachs; A Sonia Buist; Richard D Hurt Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz; Jakub Knysak; Michal Gawron; Leon Kosmider; Andrzej Sobczak; Jolanta Kurek; Adam Prokopowicz; Magdalena Jablonska-Czapla; Czeslawa Rosik-Dulewska; Christopher Havel; Peyton Jacob; Neal Benowitz Journal: Tob Control Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Jon O Ebbert; John R Hughes; Robert J West; Stephen I Rennard; Cristina Russ; Thomas D McRae; Joan Treadow; Ching-Ray Yu; Michael P Dutro; Peter W Park Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Irene Pericot-Valverde; Rebecca J Elliott; Jeff S Priest; Trace Barret; Jin H Yoon; Charles C Miller; Chizimuzo T C Okoli; Ilana Haliwa; Philip A Ades; Diann E Gaalema Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Sandra L Jackson; Stavros Tsipas; Peter K Yang; Matthew D Ritchey; Fleetwood Loustalot; Gregory Wozniak; Xu Wang Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2022-03-28 Impact factor: 6.604
Authors: Martin C Mahoney; Cheryl Rivard; Heather L Kimmel; Hoda T Hammad; Eva Sharma; Michael J Halenar; Jim Sargent; K Michael Cummings; Ray Niaura; Maciej L Goniewicz; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Dorothy Hatsukami; Diann Gaalema; Geoffrey Fong; Shannon Gravely; Carol H Christensen; Ryan Haskins; Marushka L Silveira; Carlos Blanco; Wilson Compton; Cassandra A Stanton; Andrew Hyland Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-31 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Barbara Riegel; Debra K Moser; Harleah G Buck; Victoria Vaughan Dickson; Sandra B Dunbar; Christopher S Lee; Terry A Lennie; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Judith E Mitchell; Diane J Treat-Jacobson; David E Webber Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 5.501