Literature DB >> 32319221

Biologics May Prevent Cardiovascular Events in Rheumatoid Arthritis by Inhibiting Coronary Plaque Formation and Stabilizing High-Risk Lesions.

George A Karpouzas1, Sarah R Ormseth1, Elizabeth Hernandez1, Matthew J Budoff1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) decrease cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and whether biologic DMARDs might have a beneficial effect on coronary plaque formation or progression.
METHODS: In this single-center observational cohort study, 150 patients underwent computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary atherosclerosis (total, noncalcified, mixed/calcified, and low-attenuation plaque); 101 had repeat assessments within a mean ± SD of 6.9 ± 0.3 years to evaluate plaque progression. All CVD events were prospectively recorded, including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization, stroke, claudication, and hospitalization for heart failure. The Framingham-D'Agostino score was used to assess cardiovascular risk. The segment stenosis score was used to measure plaque burden. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated.
RESULTS: After adjustment for the segment stenosis score, the Framingham-D'Agostino score, and time-varying Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the C-reactive protein level using marginal structural models, current biologic DMARD use was associated with lower long-term CVD risk (OR 0.15 [95% CI 0.04-0.60]). Noncalcified and low-attenuation plaque presence moderated the effect of biologic DMARDs on CVD risk; specifically, biologic DMARD use was associated with lower CVD risk in patients with noncalcified or low-attenuation plaque at baseline (OR 0.21 [95% CI 0.04-0.99] and OR 0.08 [95% CI 0.01-0.70], respectively), but not in those without noncalcified or low-attenuation plaque. Per-segment plaque progression analyses showed that biologic DMARD exposure was associated with transition of noncalcified to mixed/calcified plaque (OR 4.00 [95% CI 1.05-15.32]). Biologic DMARD exposure predicted a lower likelihood of new plaque forming in segments without plaque among patients without mixed/calcified plaque in other coronary segments (OR 0.40 [95% CI 0.17-0.93]), but not among those with calcification. Biologic DMARD treatment also predicted low-attenuation plaque loss (P = 0.042).
CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that in RA, biologic DMARD use is associated with reduced CVD risk, protective calcification of noncalcified lesions, and lower likelihood of new plaque formation in patients with early atherosclerosis.
© 2020, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32319221     DOI: 10.1002/art.41293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol        ISSN: 2326-5191            Impact factor:   10.995


  12 in total

1.  Prognostic Value of Serial Coronary CT Angiography in Atherosclerotic Plaque Modification: What have we learnt?

Authors:  Venkat S Manubolu; Sion K Roy; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2022-02-09

2.  The comparison of cardiovascular disease risk prediction scores and evaluation of subclinical atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Hafis Muhammed; Durga Prasanna Misra; Neeraj Jain; Sujata Ganguly; Sarit Sekhar Pattanaik; Mohit K Rai; Anamika Kumari Anuja; Namita Mohindra; Sudeep Kumar; Vikas Agarwal
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Rheumatoid Arthritis as a Risk Factor for Coronary Artery Calcification and Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Chest Pain: A Registry Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Andreas Bugge Tinggaard; Annette de Thurah; Ina Trolle Andersen; Anders Hammerich Riis; Josephine Therkildsen; Simon Winther; Ellen-Margrethe Hauge; Morten Bøttcher
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  Low levels of PCSK9 are associated with remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with anti-TNF-α: potential underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Johan Frostegård; Sabbir Ahmed; Ingiäld Hafström; Sofia Ajeganova; Mizanur Rahman
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 5.156

5.  Derivation and internal validation of a multi-biomarker-based cardiovascular disease risk prediction score for rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Fenglong Xie; Cynthia S Crowson; Eric H Sasso; Elena Hitraya; Cheryl L Chin; Richard D Bamford; Rotem Ben-Shachar; Alexander Gutin; Darl D Flake; Brent Mabey; Jerry S Lanchbury
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 6.  Testing the Effects of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs on Vascular Inflammation in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Rationale and Design of the TARGET Trial.

Authors:  Jon T Giles; Pamela M Rist; Katherine P Liao; Ahmed Tawakol; Zahi A Fayad; Venkatesh Mani; Nina P Paynter; Paul M Ridker; Robert J Glynn; Fengxin Lu; Rachel Broderick; Meredith Murray; Kathleen M M Vanni; Daniel H Solomon; Joan M Bathon
Journal:  ACR Open Rheumatol       Date:  2021-05-01

7.  Antirheumatic therapy is not associated with changes in circulating N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels in patients with autoimmune arthritis.

Authors:  Thao H P Nguyen; Morten Wang Fagerland; Gia Deyab; Gunnbjørg Hjeltnes; Ivana Hollan; Mark W Feinberg; Gro Ø Eilertsen; Knut Mikkelsen; Stefan Agewall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cardiovascular effects of biological versus conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy in treatment-naïve, early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Sven Plein; Bara Erhayiem; Graham Fent; Sarah Horton; Raluca Bianca Dumitru; Jacqueline Andrews; John P Greenwood; Paul Emery; Elizabeth Ma Hensor; Paul Baxter; Sue Pavitt; Maya H Buch
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Efflux Capacity and Atherosclerosis in Cardiovascular Disease: Pathophysiological Aspects and Pharmacological Perspectives.

Authors:  Maria Pia Adorni; Nicoletta Ronda; Franco Bernini; Francesca Zimetti
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 7.666

10.  Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients initiating biologics/apremilast for psoriatic arthritis: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Laura Pina Vegas; Philippe Le Corvoisier; Laetitia Penso; Muriel Paul; Emilie Sbidian; Pascal Claudepierre
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 7.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.