| Literature DB >> 33795659 |
M G A Van Cauwenberge1,2, F Bouckaert3,4,5, K Vansteelandt3,4, C Adamson6, F L De Winter3,4, P Sienaert4,5, J Van den Stock3,4, A Dols7,8, D Rhebergen7,8,9, M L Stek7,8, L Emsell3,4,10, M Vandenbulcke3,4.
Abstract
Psychomotor dysfunction (PMD) is a core element and key contributor to disability in late life depression (LLD), which responds well to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The neurobiology of PMD and its response to ECT are not well understood. We hypothesized that PMD in LLD is associated with lower striatal volume, and that striatal volume increase following ECT explains PMD improvement. We analyzed data from a two-center prospective cohort study of 110 LLD subjects (>55 years) receiving ECT. Brain MRI and assessment of mood, cognition, and PMD was performed 1 week before, 1 week after, and 6 months after ECT. Volumetry of the caudate nucleus, putamen, globus pallidus, and nucleus accumbens was derived from automatically segmented brain MRIs using Freesurfer®. Linear multiple regression analyses were used to study associations between basal ganglia volume and PMD. Brain MRI was available for 66 patients 1 week post ECT and in 22 patients also six months post ECT. Baseline PMD was associated with a smaller left caudate nucleus. One week after ECT, PMD improved and volume increases were detected bilaterally in the caudate nucleus and putamen, and in the right nucleus accumbens. Improved PMD after ECT did not relate to the significant volume increases in these structures, but was predicted by a nonsignificant volume change in the right globus pallidus. No volume differences were detected 6 months after ECT, compared to baseline. Although PMD is related to lower striatal volume in LLD, ECT-induced increase of striatal volume does not explain PMD improvement.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33795659 PMCID: PMC8017007 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-021-01314-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Psychiatry ISSN: 2158-3188 Impact factor: 6.222
Fig. 1Flowchart of inclusion/exclusion process.
1MODECT Mood Disorders in Elderly treated with ECT study (Dols et al.[37]), MDD major depressive disorder, ECT electroconvulsive therapy, MRI magnetic resonance imaging.
Fig. 2Volumetric 3D segmentation of high-resolution 3D T1-weighted MR images using Freesurfer 6.0.0 (Fisher et al. 2012).
Caudate nucleus, putamen, globus pallidus, and nucleus accumbens volumes were extracted from whole-brain segmentation images. Participants were scanned at three time points: prior to ECT (baseline, t0), one week after (t1), and six months after ECT completion (t2). The volumetric data were normalized to account for differences in total brain volume using a standard approach (Jack et al.[48]).
Patient characteristics.
| Age (Yrs) | 72 ± 8.4 |
| Sex: female | 43 (65%) |
| Site: Leuven | 33 (50%) |
| Late onset depression | 31 (47%) |
| Melancholic depression | 49 (80%) |
| Psychotic depression | 32 (49%) |
| MDD duration (months) | 6 [3;12] |
| MADRS baseline | 35 [29;41] |
| MMSE baseline | 24 [21;28] |
| CORE total baseline | 15 [8;22] |
| CORE non-interaction | 5 [2;8] |
| CORE agitation | 8 [4;10] |
| CORE retardation | 2 [0;4] |
| Time | 2 [1;5] |
| Medication during ECT | 17 (32.1%) |
| ECT course duration (days) | 39 [28;48] |
| Number of ECT sessions | 11 [8;14] |
| Only RUL ECT | 47 (71.2%) |
MADRS Montgomery Åsberg Depression Scale, n = 64.
MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, n = 57. The CORE rating scale, n = 61.
MDD duration duration of current major depression episode, n = 61.
Time t0 to ECT = time between baseline MRI and ECT start, n = 62.
ECT electroconvulsive therapy, RUL right unilateral.
Fig. 3CORE total and CORE subscale scores before and after ECT.
ECT electroconvulsive therapy. *p < 0.05, Bonferroni–Holm correction applied. Black squares = outliers (>|2x SD|), diamonds = extreme outliers (>|3x SD|).
Fig. 4Basal ganglia volumes before and after ECT.
Box-and-Whisker’s plot of basal ganglia ROI volume at baseline (t0, n = 66), one week after (t1, n = 66), and six months after ECT completion (t2, n = 22). Student’s paired t test for related samples, sign. level α = 0.05 (2-tailed), *p significance adjusted after Bonferroni–Holm correction for multiple testing. Black squares = outliers (>|2x SD|), diamonds = extreme outliers (>|3x SD|).