Literature DB >> 27150953

"I'm Healthy, It's Not Going To Be Me": Exploring experiences of carriers identified through a population reproductive genetic carrier screening panel in Australia.

Catherine A Beard1,2, David J Amor1,2,3, Louisa Di Pietro3,4, Alison D Archibald1,2,3.   

Abstract

Advancing genetic testing technologies mean that population-based carrier screening for multiple inherited conditions is now available. As the number of genetic conditions being screened increases, there is a need for research into how people experience these screening programs. This research aimed to explore how women experience simultaneous carrier screening for three inherited conditions: cystic fibrosis (CF), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), and fragile X syndrome (FXS). A qualitative approach was adopted using in-depth semi-structured interviews to explore the experiences of ten female participants: five SMA carriers, three CF carriers, and two FXS premutation carriers. Eight participants were pregnant when offered screening by their general practitioner or obstetrician and the decision to have screening was described as straightforward. Participants reported experiencing emotional responses such as anxiety and stress while waiting for either their partner's carrier screen result (CF or SMA carriers) or the pregnancy's CVS result (FXS carrier) and sought additional information about the relevant condition during this time. Most participants were in favor of population carrier screening for these conditions, preferably prior to conception. Genetic counselors played an essential role in supporting couples after they received a carrier result given the variable consent processes undertaken when screening was offered. Further research should focus on the development of reliable online information tailored to people receiving carrier results and strategies for raising awareness of the availability of population carrier screening within the community.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  community genetics; cystic fibrosis; fragile X syndrome; population carrier screening; qualitative research; spinal muscular atrophy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27150953     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  12 in total

1.  Patient actions and reactions after receiving negative results from expanded carrier screening.

Authors:  S A Kraft; J L Schneider; M C Leo; T L Kauffman; J V Davis; K M Porter; C K McMullen; B S Wilfond; K A B Goddard
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  Preconception carrier screening for multiple disorders: evaluation of a screening offer in a Dutch founder population.

Authors:  Inge B Mathijssen; Kim C A Holtkamp; Cecile P E Ottenheim; Janneke M C van Eeten-Nijman; Phillis Lakeman; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Merel C van Maarle; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Reproductive genetic carrier screening for cystic fibrosis, fragile X syndrome, and spinal muscular atrophy in Australia: outcomes of 12,000 tests.

Authors:  Alison Dalton Archibald; Melanie Jane Smith; Trent Burgess; Katrina Louise Scarff; Justine Elliott; Clare Elizabeth Hunt; Zoe McDonald; Caitlin Barns-Jenkins; Chelsea Holt; Karina Sandoval; Vanessa Siva Kumar; Lisa Ward; Emily Caroline Allen; Sarah Valerie Collis; Shannon Cowie; David Francis; Martin B Delatycki; Eppie Mildred Yiu; R John Massie; Mark Domenic Pertile; Desirée du Sart; Damien Bruno; David J Amor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Evaluating the efficacy of three carrier screening workflows designed to identify at-risk carrier couples.

Authors:  Aishwarya Arjunan; Raul Torres; Anna Gardiner; Kristjan Eerik Kaseniit; Jeff Wootton; Rotem Ben-Shachar; Katherine Johansen Taber
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 5.  Incorporating patient perspectives in the development of a core outcome set for reproductive genetic carrier screening: a sequential systematic review.

Authors:  Ebony Richardson; Alison McEwen; Toby Newton-John; Ashley Crook; Chris Jacobs
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 5.351

6.  The role of experiential knowledge within attitudes towards genetic carrier screening: A comparison of people with and without experience of spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Philip J Young; Oliver Warren; Frances E Griffiths
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for retinoblastoma survivors: a cost-effectiveness study.

Authors:  D Schofield; M J B Zeppel; S Staffieri; R N Shrestha; D Jelovic; E Lee; R V Jamieson
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2020-05-11

8.  Expanded carrier screening for autosomal recessive conditions in health care: Arguments for a couple-based approach and examination of couples' views.

Authors:  Mirjam Plantinga; Erwin Birnie; Juliette Schuurmans; Anne H Buitenhuis; Elise Boersma; Anneke M Lucassen; Marian A Verkerk; Irene M van Langen; Adelita V Ranchor
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  First French study relative to preconception genetic testing: 1500 general population participants' opinion.

Authors:  Maud Jourdain; Bertrand Isidor; Valérie Bonneau; Mathilde Nizon; Xenia Latypova; Aurélie Gaultier; Eugénie Hoarau; Stéphane Bézieau; Guy Minguet; Mauro Turrini
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.123

10.  Mainstream genetic testing for breast cancer patients: early experiences from the Parkville Familial Cancer Centre.

Authors:  Catherine Beard; Katrina Monohan; Linda Cicciarelli; Paul A James
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 5.351

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.