Literature DB >> 29293279

Patient actions and reactions after receiving negative results from expanded carrier screening.

S A Kraft1,2, J L Schneider3, M C Leo3, T L Kauffman3, J V Davis3, K M Porter1, C K McMullen3, B S Wilfond1,2, K A B Goddard3.   

Abstract

With the expansion of carrier screening to general preconception and prenatal patient populations, most patients will receive negative results, which we define as indicating <25% risk of having a child with a genetic condition. Because there is limited experience with expanded carrier screening, it is important to understand how receiving negative results affects patients, especially as providers, payers, and policymakers consider whether to offer it. In this mixed-methods study, we asked preconception patients enrolled in the NextGen study about their expectations and experiences receiving negative expanded carrier screening results. Participants completed surveys at study enrollment (n = 110 women, 51 male partners), after receiving carrier results (n = 100 women, 38 male partners), after receiving secondary findings (n = 98 women, 36 male partners), and 6 months after receiving results (n = 95 women, 28 male partners). We also interviewed a subset of participants 12 to 24 months after receiving results (n = 24 women, 12 male partners). We found minimal negative emotional impact and privacy concerns, increased confidence in reproductive plans, and few changes to health behaviors, although some patients made health decisions based on misunderstandings of their results. These findings suggest that expanded carrier screening causes minimal psychosocial harms, but systems are needed to reduce the risk of misinterpreting results.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genetic carrier detection; genomics; interview; preconception care; psychosocial factors; surveys and questionnaires

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29293279      PMCID: PMC5899643          DOI: 10.1111/cge.13206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  24 in total

1.  Expanded carrier screening in reproductive medicine-points to consider: a joint statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Society of Genetic Counselors, Perinatal Quality Foundation, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine.

Authors:  Janice G Edwards; Gerald Feldman; James Goldberg; Anthony R Gregg; Mary E Norton; Nancy C Rose; Adele Schneider; Katie Stoll; Ronald Wapner; Michael S Watson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  "I'm Healthy, It's Not Going To Be Me": Exploring experiences of carriers identified through a population reproductive genetic carrier screening panel in Australia.

Authors:  Catherine A Beard; David J Amor; Louisa Di Pietro; Alison D Archibald
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: psychological effects on carriers and their partners.

Authors:  M E Mennie; M E Compton; A Gilfillan; W A Liston; I Pullen; D A Whyte; D J Brock
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Perception of carrier status by cystic fibrosis siblings.

Authors:  J H Fanos; J P Johnson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Tara W Strine; Robert L Spitzer; Janet B W Williams; Joyce T Berry; Ali H Mokdad
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: Assessment of the perspectives of patients with colorectal cancer regarding benefits and barriers.

Authors:  Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Jamilyn M Zepp; Mari J Gilmore; James V Davis; Elizabeth J Esterberg; Kristin R Muessig; Susan K Peterson; Sapna Syngal; Louise S Acheson; Georgia L Wiesner; Jacob A Reiss; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  An empirical estimate of carrier frequencies for 400+ causal Mendelian variants: results from an ethnically diverse clinical sample of 23,453 individuals.

Authors:  Gabriel A Lazarin; Imran S Haque; Shivani Nazareth; Kevin Iori; A Scott Patterson; Jessica L Jacobson; John R Marshall; William K Seltzer; Pasquale Patrizio; Eric A Evans; Balaji S Srinivasan
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Population-based carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: a systematic review of 23 years of research.

Authors:  Liane Ioannou; Belinda J McClaren; John Massie; Sharon Lewis; Sylvia A Metcalfe; Laura Forrest; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Considering the cost of expanded carrier screening panels.

Authors:  Katie Stoll; Robert Resta
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  ACMG position statement on prenatal/preconception expanded carrier screening.

Authors:  Wayne W Grody; Barry H Thompson; Anthony R Gregg; Lora H Bean; Kristin G Monaghan; Adele Schneider; Roger V Lebo
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Genetic Counseling, Personalized Medicine, and Precision Health.

Authors:  Erica Ramos
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.159

Review 2.  Incorporating patient perspectives in the development of a core outcome set for reproductive genetic carrier screening: a sequential systematic review.

Authors:  Ebony Richardson; Alison McEwen; Toby Newton-John; Ashley Crook; Chris Jacobs
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 5.351

3.  First French study relative to preconception genetic testing: 1500 general population participants' opinion.

Authors:  Maud Jourdain; Bertrand Isidor; Valérie Bonneau; Mathilde Nizon; Xenia Latypova; Aurélie Gaultier; Eugénie Hoarau; Stéphane Bézieau; Guy Minguet; Mauro Turrini
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 4.  The evolving landscape of expanded carrier screening: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kraft; Devan Duenas; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Couples' experiences with expanded carrier screening: evaluation of a university hospital screening offer.

Authors:  Ivy van Dijke; Phillis Lakeman; Naoual Sabiri; Hanna Rusticus; Cecile P E Ottenheim; Inge B Mathijssen; Martina C Cornel; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Couple-based expanded carrier screening provided by general practitioners to couples in the Dutch general population: psychological outcomes and reproductive intentions.

Authors:  Erwin Birnie; Juliette Schuurmans; Mirjam Plantinga; Kristin M Abbott; Angela Fenwick; Anneke Lucassen; Marjolein Y Berger; Irene M van Langen; Adelita V Ranchor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 8.822

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.