Literature DB >> 36097155

Societal implications of expanded universal carrier screening: a scoping review.

Lieke M van den Heuvel1,2, Nina van den Berg1,2, A Cecile J W Janssens3, Erwin Birnie1, Lidewij Henneman2, Wybo J Dondorp4, Mirjam Plantinga1, Irene M van Langen5.   

Abstract

Carrier screening aims to identify couples at risk of conceiving children with a recessive condition. Until recently, carrier screening was primarily offered ancestry-based. Technological advances now facilitate expanded universal carrier screening (EUCS). This scoping review aimed to map EUCS's potential societal implications based on both theoretical studies and empirical evidence. To this aim, we performed a CoCites search to find relevant articles, including articles describing carrier screening for at-risk populations, based on five selected query articles. Forty articles were included. Three main potential societal implications were identified: (1) unwanted medicalization, (2) stigmatization and discrimination of carriers and people affected with the conditions screened and (3) challenges in achieving equitable access. Within these themes, potential positive implications are reduction of ethnic stigmatization in ancestry-based offers and increased equity. Potential negative implications are reinforcement of disability-based stigmatization, less possibility for developing expertise in healthcare and societal pressure to partake in screening. Empirical evidence on all these implications is however scarce. In conclusion, both positive and negative potential societal implications of implementing EUCS, primarily theoretical, were identified, even in at-risk groups where evidence is mostly lacking. Empirical research in EUCS pilots is needed to identify which societal implications are likely to occur and therefore should be overcome when implementing EUCS.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36097155     DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01178-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   5.351


  62 in total

Review 1.  Expanded carrier screening: A review of early implementation and literature.

Authors:  Gabriel A Lazarin; Imran S Haque
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.300

2.  The experience of beta-thalassaemiaand its prevention in Cyprus.

Authors:  E M Kalokairinou
Journal:  Med Law       Date:  2008-12

3.  Moving up the slippery slope: mandated genetic screening on Cyprus.

Authors:  Ruth Schwartz Cowan
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 4.  Expanded carrier screening for monogenic disorders: where are we now?

Authors:  Davit Chokoshvili; Danya Vears; Pascal Borry
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Advantages of expanded universal carrier screening: what is at stake?

Authors:  Sanne van der Hout; Kim Ca Holtkamp; Lidewij Henneman; Guido de Wert; Wybo J Dondorp
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Carrier matching and collective socialization in community genetics: Dor Yeshorim and the reinforcement of stigma.

Authors:  Aviad E Raz; Yafa Vizner
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  The landscape of autosomal-recessive pathogenic variants in European populations reveals phenotype-specific effects.

Authors:  Hila Fridman; Helger G Yntema; Reedik Mägi; Reidar Andreson; Andres Metspalu; Massimo Mezzavila; Chris Tyler-Smith; Yali Xue; Shai Carmi; Ephrat Levy-Lahad; Christian Gilissen; Han G Brunner
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 11.043

8.  Responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening.

Authors:  Lidewij Henneman; Pascal Borry; Davit Chokoshvili; Martina C Cornel; Carla G van El; Francesca Forzano; Alison Hall; Heidi C Howard; Sandra Janssens; Hülya Kayserili; Phillis Lakeman; Anneke Lucassen; Sylvia A Metcalfe; Lovro Vidmar; Guido de Wert; Wybo J Dondorp; Borut Peterlin
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Outcomes of an International Workshop on Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening: Some Considerations for Governments.

Authors:  Caron M Molster; Karla Lister; Selina Metternick-Jones; Gareth Baynam; Angus John Clarke; Volker Straub; Hugh J S Dawkins; Nigel Laing
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-02-24

10.  Feasibility of couple-based expanded carrier screening offered by general practitioners.

Authors:  Juliette Schuurmans; Erwin Birnie; Lieke M van den Heuvel; Mirjam Plantinga; Anneke Lucassen; Dorina M van der Kolk; Kristin M Abbott; Adelita V Ranchor; Agnes D Diemers; Irene M van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.