Literature DB >> 33686853

A Benchmark of Electrostatic Method Performance in Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Yunhui Ge1, David F Hahn2, David L Mobley1,3.   

Abstract

Relative free energy calculations are fast becoming a critical part of early stage pharmaceutical design, making it important to know how to obtain the best performance with these calculations in applications that could span hundreds of calculations and molecules. In this work, we compared two different treatments of long-range electrostatics, Particle Mesh Ewald (PME) and Reaction Field (RF), in relative binding free energy calculations using a nonequilibrium switching protocol. We found simulations using RF achieve comparable results to those using PME but gain more efficiency when using CPU and similar performance using GPU. The results from this work encourage more use of RF in molecular simulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33686853      PMCID: PMC8208087          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  19 in total

1.  Improved ligand-protein binding affinity predictions using multiple binding modes.

Authors:  Eva Stjernschantz; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Computation of methodology-independent ionic solvation free energies from molecular simulations. II. The hydration free energy of the sodium cation.

Authors:  Mika A Kastenholz; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Computation of methodology-independent ionic solvation free energies from molecular simulations. I. The electrostatic potential in molecular liquids.

Authors:  M A Kastenholz; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Calculating the binding free energies of charged species based on explicit-solvent simulations employing lattice-sum methods: an accurate correction scheme for electrostatic finite-size effects.

Authors:  Gabriel J Rocklin; David L Mobley; Ken A Dill; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Reproducibility of Free Energy Calculations across Different Molecular Simulation Software Packages.

Authors:  Hannes H Loeffler; Stefano Bosisio; Guilherme Duarte Ramos Matos; Donghyuk Suh; Benoit Roux; David L Mobley; Julien Michel
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.

Authors:  Zoe Cournia; Bryce Allen; Woody Sherman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Lessons learned from comparing molecular dynamics engines on the SAMPL5 dataset.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; Christoph Klein; Jason M Swails; Jian Yin; Michael K Gilson; David L Mobley; David A Case; Ellen D Zhong
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Using AMBER18 for Relative Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Lin Frank Song; Tai-Sung Lee; Chun Zhu; Darrin M York; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Molecular dynamics simulations of a reversibly folding beta-heptapeptide in methanol: influence of the treatment of long-range electrostatic interactions.

Authors:  Maria M Reif; Vincent Kräutler; Mika A Kastenholz; Xavier Daura; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Net charge changes in the calculation of relative ligand-binding free energies via classical atomistic molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Maria M Reif; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.376

View more
  2 in total

1.  Expanded Ensemble Methods Can be Used to Accurately Predict Protein-Ligand Relative Binding Free Energies.

Authors:  Si Zhang; David F Hahn; Michael R Shirts; Vincent A Voelz
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 6.578

2.  Correction Schemes for Absolute Binding Free Energies Involving Lipid Bilayers.

Authors:  Zhiyi Wu; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 6.578

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.