Literature DB >> 16599661

Computation of methodology-independent ionic solvation free energies from molecular simulations. I. The electrostatic potential in molecular liquids.

M A Kastenholz1, Philippe H Hünenberger.   

Abstract

The computation of ionic solvation free energies from atomistic simulations is a surprisingly difficult problem that has found no satisfactory solution for more than 15 years. The reason is that the charging free energies evaluated from such simulations are affected by very large errors. One of these is related to the choice of a specific convention for summing up the contributions of solvent charges to the electrostatic potential in the ionic cavity, namely, on the basis of point charges within entire solvent molecules (M scheme) or on the basis of individual point charges (P scheme). The use of an inappropriate convention may lead to a charge-independent offset in the calculated potential, which depends on the details of the summation scheme, on the quadrupole-moment trace of the solvent molecule, and on the approximate form used to represent electrostatic interactions in the system. However, whether the M or P scheme (if any) represents the appropriate convention is still a matter of on-going debate. The goal of the present article is to settle this long-standing controversy by carefully analyzing (both analytically and numerically) the properties of the electrostatic potential in molecular liquids (and inside cavities within them). Restricting the discussion to real liquids of "spherical" solvent molecules (represented by a classical solvent model with a single van der Waals interaction site), it is concluded that (i) for Coulombic (or straight-cutoff truncated) electrostatic interactions, the M scheme is the appropriate way of calculating the electrostatic potential; (ii) for non-Coulombic interactions deriving from a continuously differentiable function, both M and P schemes generally deliver an incorrect result (for which an analytical correction must be applied); and (iii) finite-temperature effects, including intermolecular orientation correlations and a preferential orientational structure in the neighborhood of a liquid-vacuum interface, must be taken into account. Applications of these results to the computation methodology-independent ionic solvation free energies from molecular simulations will be the scope of a forthcoming article.

Year:  2006        PMID: 16599661     DOI: 10.1063/1.2172593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  35 in total

Review 1.  Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity by free energy simulations: assumptions, pitfalls and expectations.

Authors:  Julien Michel; Jonathan W Essex
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Copper Oxidation/Reduction in Water and Protein: Studies with DFTB3/MM and VALBOND Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Haiyun Jin; Puja Goyal; Akshaya Kumar Das; Michael Gaus; Markus Meuwly; Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  On the origin of the electrostatic potential difference at a liquid-vacuum interface.

Authors:  Edward Harder; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-12-21       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Calculating the binding free energies of charged species based on explicit-solvent simulations employing lattice-sum methods: an accurate correction scheme for electrostatic finite-size effects.

Authors:  Gabriel J Rocklin; David L Mobley; Ken A Dill; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Lead optimization mapper: automating free energy calculations for lead optimization.

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Yujie Wu; Teng Lin; Robert Abel; Jonathan P Redmann; Christopher M Summa; Vivian R Jaber; Nathan M Lim; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Polarizable Force Field for Molecular Ions Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator.

Authors:  Fang-Yu Lin; Pedro E M Lopes; Edward Harder; Benoît Roux; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Properties of water along the liquid-vapor coexistence curve via molecular dynamics simulations using the polarizable TIP4P-QDP-LJ water model.

Authors:  Brad A Bauer; Sandeep Patel
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Ionic solvation studied by image-charge reaction field method.

Authors:  Yuchun Lin; Andrij Baumketner; Wei Song; Shaozhong Deng; Donald Jacobs; Wei Cai
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 9.  Interacting ions in biophysics: real is not ideal.

Authors:  Bob Eisenberg
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Accurate Prediction of the Hydration Free Energies of 20 Salts through Adaptive Force Matching and the Proper Comparison with Experimental References.

Authors:  Jicun Li; Feng Wang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.