Literature DB >> 29243483

Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.

Zoe Cournia1, Bryce Allen2, Woody Sherman2.   

Abstract

Accurate in silico prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities has been a primary objective of structure-based drug design for decades due to the putative value it would bring to the drug discovery process. However, computational methods have historically failed to deliver value in real-world drug discovery applications due to a variety of scientific, technical, and practical challenges. Recently, a family of approaches commonly referred to as relative binding free energy (RBFE) calculations, which rely on physics-based molecular simulations and statistical mechanics, have shown promise in reliably generating accurate predictions in the context of drug discovery projects. This advance arises from accumulating developments in the underlying scientific methods (decades of research on force fields and sampling algorithms) coupled with vast increases in computational resources (graphics processing units and cloud infrastructures). Mounting evidence from retrospective validation studies, blind challenge predictions, and prospective applications suggests that RBFE simulations can now predict the affinity differences for congeneric ligands with sufficient accuracy and throughput to deliver considerable value in hit-to-lead and lead optimization efforts. Here, we present an overview of current RBFE implementations, highlighting recent advances and remaining challenges, along with examples that emphasize practical considerations for obtaining reliable RBFE results. We focus specifically on relative binding free energies because the calculations are less computationally intensive than absolute binding free energy (ABFE) calculations and map directly onto the hit-to-lead and lead optimization processes, where the prediction of relative binding energies between a reference molecule and new ideas (virtual molecules) can be used to prioritize molecules for synthesis. We describe the critical aspects of running RBFE calculations, from both theoretical and applied perspectives, using a combination of retrospective literature examples and prospective studies from drug discovery projects. This work is intended to provide a contemporary overview of the scientific, technical, and practical issues associated with running relative binding free energy simulations, with a focus on real-world drug discovery applications. We offer guidelines for improving the accuracy of RBFE simulations, especially for challenging cases, and emphasize unresolved issues that could be improved by further research in the field.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29243483     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  114 in total

1.  Assessing the performance of three resveratrol in binding with SIRT1 by molecular dynamics simulation and MM/GBSA methods: the weakest binding of resveratrol 3 to SIRT1 triggers a possibility of dissociation from its binding site.

Authors:  Han Chen; Yan Wang; Zheng Gao; Wen Yang; Jian Gao
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Absolute Free Energy of Binding Calculations for Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor in Complex with a Druglike Inhibitor.

Authors:  Yue Qian; Israel Cabeza de Vaca; Jonah Z Vilseck; Daniel J Cole; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 4.  Free Energy Calculations for Protein-Ligand Binding Prediction.

Authors:  Willem Jespers; Johan Åqvist; Hugo Gutiérrez-de-Terán
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

5.  Exploring the Effectiveness of Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Dibyendu Mondal; Jacob Florian; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Bryce K Allen; Timothy J Giese; Zhenyu Guo; Pengfei Li; Charles Lin; T Dwight McGee; David A Pearlman; Brian K Radak; Yujun Tao; Hsu-Chun Tsai; Huafeng Xu; Woody Sherman; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Automated, Accurate, and Scalable Relative Protein-Ligand Binding Free-Energy Calculations Using Lambda Dynamics.

Authors:  E Prabhu Raman; Thomas J Paul; Ryan L Hayes; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Enhanced Jarzynski free energy calculations using weighted ensemble.

Authors:  Nicole M Roussey; Alex Dickson
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Scalable molecular dynamics on CPU and GPU architectures with NAMD.

Authors:  James C Phillips; David J Hardy; Julio D C Maia; John E Stone; João V Ribeiro; Rafael C Bernardi; Ronak Buch; Giacomo Fiorin; Jérôme Hénin; Wei Jiang; Ryan McGreevy; Marcelo C R Melo; Brian K Radak; Robert D Skeel; Abhishek Singharoy; Yi Wang; Benoît Roux; Aleksei Aksimentiev; Zaida Luthey-Schulten; Laxmikant V Kalé; Klaus Schulten; Christophe Chipot; Emad Tajkhorshid
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Accounting for the Central Role of Interfacial Water in Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Ido Y Ben-Shalom; Zhixiong Lin; Brian K Radak; Charles Lin; Woody Sherman; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.