Literature DB >> 20513413

Improved ligand-protein binding affinity predictions using multiple binding modes.

Eva Stjernschantz1, Chris Oostenbrink.   

Abstract

Accurate ligand-protein binding affinity prediction, for a set of similar binders, is a major challenge in the lead optimization stage in drug development. In general, docking and scoring functions perform unsatisfactorily in this application. Docking calculations, followed by molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations can be applied to improve the predictions. However, for targets with large, flexible binding sites, with no experimentally determined binding modes for a set of ligands, insufficient sampling can decrease the accuracy of the free energy calculations. Cytochrome P450s, a protein family of major importance for drug metabolism, is an example of a challenging target for binding affinity predictions. As a result, the choice of starting structure from the docking solutions becomes crucial. In this study, an iterative scheme is introduced that includes multiple independent molecular dynamics simulations to obtain weighted ensemble averages to be used in the linear interaction energy method. The proposed scheme makes the initial pose selection less crucial for further simulation, as it automatically calculates the relative weights of the various poses. It also properly takes into account the possibility that multiple binding modes contribute similarly to the overall affinity, or of similar compounds occupying very different poses. The method was applied to a set of 12 compounds binding to cytochrome P450 2C9 and it displayed a root mean-square error of 2.9 kJ/mol. Copyright (c) 2010 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20513413      PMCID: PMC2877349          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.02.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  47 in total

1.  Binding affinity prediction with different force fields: examination of the linear interaction energy method.

Authors:  Martin Almlöf; Bjørn O Brandsdal; Johan Aqvist
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Philippe Ferrara; Holger Gohlke; Daniel J Price; Gerhard Klebe; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05.

Authors:  Markus Christen; Philippe H Hünenberger; Dirk Bakowies; Riccardo Baron; Roland Bürgi; Daan P Geerke; Tim N Heinz; Mika A Kastenholz; Vincent Kräutler; Chris Oostenbrink; Christine Peter; Daniel Trzesniak; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Comparison of methods for the prediction of the metabolic sites for CYP3A4-mediated metabolic reactions.

Authors:  Diansong Zhou; Lovisa Afzelius; Scott W Grimm; Tommy B Andersson; Randy J Zauhar; Ismael Zamora
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 3.922

5.  Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Xun Li; Yan Li; Zhihai Liu; Renxiao Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Predicting binding modes from free energy calculations.

Authors:  Martin Nervall; Peter Hanspers; Jens Carlsson; Lars Boukharta; Johan Aqvist
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes.

Authors:  M D Eldridge; C W Murray; T R Auton; G V Paolini; R P Mee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  The particle concept: placing discrete water molecules during protein-ligand docking predictions.

Authors:  M Rarey; B Kramer; T Lengauer
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-01-01

Review 9.  Mechanisms of cytochrome P450 substrate oxidation: MiniReview.

Authors:  F Peter Guengerich
Journal:  J Biochem Mol Toxicol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.642

Review 10.  Cytochrome p450 and chemical toxicology.

Authors:  F Peter Guengerich
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 3.739

View more
  37 in total

1.  Experimental versus predicted affinities for ligand binding to estrogen receptor: iterative selection and rescoring of docked poses systematically improves the correlation.

Authors:  James S Wright; James M Anderson; Hooman Shadnia; Tony Durst; John A Katzenellenbogen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Discovery of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Binding Proteins in the Escherichia coli Proteome Using a Combined Energetic- and Structural-Bioinformatics-Based Approach.

Authors:  Lingfei Zeng; Woong-Hee Shin; Xiaolei Zhu; Sung Hoon Park; Chiwook Park; W Andy Tao; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 3.  Receptor-ligand molecular docking.

Authors:  Isabella A Guedes; Camila S de Magalhães; Laurent E Dardenne
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2013-12-21

4.  Hybrid Steered Molecular Dynamics-Docking: An Efficient Solution to the Problem of Ranking Inhibitor Affinities Against a Flexible Drug Target.

Authors:  Katie L Whalen; Kevin M Chang; M Ashley Spies
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.353

5.  Perspective: Alchemical free energy calculations for drug discovery.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Pavel V Klimovich
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Identification of a less toxic vinca alkaloid derivative for use as a chemotherapeutic agent, based on in silico structural insights and metabolic interactions with CYP3A4 and CYP3A5.

Authors:  Nikhat Saba; Alpana Seal
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2018-03-04       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Exploring fragment-based target-specific ranking protocol with machine learning on cathepsin S.

Authors:  Yuwei Yang; Jianing Lu; Chao Yang; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 8.  Computational prediction of metabolism: sites, products, SAR, P450 enzyme dynamics, and mechanisms.

Authors:  Johannes Kirchmair; Mark J Williamson; Jonathan D Tyzack; Lu Tan; Peter J Bond; Andreas Bender; Robert C Glen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Insights into the EGFR SAR of N-phenylquinazolin-4-amine-derivatives using quantum mechanical pairwise-interaction energies.

Authors:  Saw Simeon; Nathjanan Jongkon; Warot Chotpatiwetchkul; M Paul Gleeson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Binding Modes of Ligands Using Enhanced Sampling (BLUES): Rapid Decorrelation of Ligand Binding Modes via Nonequilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo.

Authors:  Samuel C Gill; Nathan M Lim; Patrick B Grinaway; Ariën S Rustenburg; Josh Fass; Gregory A Ross; John D Chodera; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.