Literature DB >> 24320250

Calculating the binding free energies of charged species based on explicit-solvent simulations employing lattice-sum methods: an accurate correction scheme for electrostatic finite-size effects.

Gabriel J Rocklin1, David L Mobley, Ken A Dill, Philippe H Hünenberger.   

Abstract

The calculation of a protein-ligand binding free energy based on molecular dynamics (MD) simulations generally relies on a thermodynamic cycle in which the ligand is alchemically inserted into the system, both in the solvated protein and free in solution. The corresponding ligand-insertion free energies are typically calculated in nanoscale computational boxes simulated under periodic boundary conditions and considering electrostatic interactions defined by a periodic lattice-sum. This is distinct from the ideal bulk situation of a system of macroscopic size simulated under non-periodic boundary conditions with Coulombic electrostatic interactions. This discrepancy results in finite-size effects, which affect primarily the charging component of the insertion free energy, are dependent on the box size, and can be large when the ligand bears a net charge, especially if the protein is charged as well. This article investigates finite-size effects on calculated charging free energies using as a test case the binding of the ligand 2-amino-5-methylthiazole (net charge +1 e) to a mutant form of yeast cytochrome c peroxidase in water. Considering different charge isoforms of the protein (net charges -5, 0, +3, or +9 e), either in the absence or the presence of neutralizing counter-ions, and sizes of the cubic computational box (edges ranging from 7.42 to 11.02 nm), the potentially large magnitude of finite-size effects on the raw charging free energies (up to 17.1 kJ mol(-1)) is demonstrated. Two correction schemes are then proposed to eliminate these effects, a numerical and an analytical one. Both schemes are based on a continuum-electrostatics analysis and require performing Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) calculations on the protein-ligand system. While the numerical scheme requires PB calculations under both non-periodic and periodic boundary conditions, the latter at the box size considered in the MD simulations, the analytical scheme only requires three non-periodic PB calculations for a given system, its dependence on the box size being analytical. The latter scheme also provides insight into the physical origin of the finite-size effects. These two schemes also encompass a correction for discrete solvent effects that persists even in the limit of infinite box sizes. Application of either scheme essentially eliminates the size dependence of the corrected charging free energies (maximal deviation of 1.5 kJ mol(-1)). Because it is simple to apply, the analytical correction scheme offers a general solution to the problem of finite-size effects in free-energy calculations involving charged solutes, as encountered in calculations concerning, e.g., protein-ligand binding, biomolecular association, residue mutation, pKa and redox potential estimation, substrate transformation, solvation, and solvent-solvent partitioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24320250      PMCID: PMC3838431          DOI: 10.1063/1.4826261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  67 in total

1.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome.

Authors:  N A Baker; D Sept; S Joseph; M J Holst; J A McCammon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Electrostatic contributions to T4 lysozyme stability: solvent-exposed charges versus semi-buried salt bridges.

Authors:  Feng Dong; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05.

Authors:  Markus Christen; Philippe H Hünenberger; Dirk Bakowies; Riccardo Baron; Roland Bürgi; Daan P Geerke; Tim N Heinz; Mika A Kastenholz; Vincent Kräutler; Chris Oostenbrink; Christine Peter; Daniel Trzesniak; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Computation of methodology-independent ionic solvation free energies from molecular simulations. II. The hydration free energy of the sodium cation.

Authors:  Mika A Kastenholz; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Electrostatic contribution to the binding stability of protein-protein complexes.

Authors:  Feng Dong; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-10-01

6.  Single mutation induced H3N2 hemagglutinin antibody neutralization: a free energy perturbation study.

Authors:  Ruhong Zhou; Payel Das; Ajay K Royyuru
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Thermodynamic stability of water molecules in the bacteriorhodopsin proton channel: a molecular dynamics free energy perturbation study.

Authors:  B Roux; M Nina; R Pomès; J C Smith
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Surface potential of the water liquid-vapor interface.

Authors:  M A Wilson; A Pohorille; L R Pratt
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  1988-03-01       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Blind prediction of charged ligand binding affinities in a model binding site.

Authors:  Gabriel J Rocklin; Sarah E Boyce; Marcus Fischer; Inbar Fish; David L Mobley; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Efficient Combination of Environment Change and Alchemical Perturbation within the Enveloping Distribution Sampling (EDS) Scheme: Twin-System EDS and Application to the Determination of Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients.

Authors:  Niels Hansen; Philippe H Hünenberger; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  60 in total

1.  Computational and Experimental Studies of Inhibitor Design for Aldolase A.

Authors:  Rui Qi; Brandon Walker; Zhifeng Jing; Maiya Yu; Gabriel Stancu; Ramakrishna Edupuganti; Kevin N Dalby; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Resolving the Ligand-Binding Specificity in c-MYC G-Quadruplex DNA: Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations and SPR Experiment.

Authors:  Nanjie Deng; Lauren Wickstrom; Piotr Cieplak; Clement Lin; Danzhou Yang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Molecular Dynamics Study of the Hybridization between RNA and Modified Oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Zhifeng Jing; Rui Qi; Marc Thibonnier; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Approaching protein design with multisite λ dynamics: Accurate and scalable mutational folding free energies in T4 lysozyme.

Authors:  Ryan L Hayes; Jonah Z Vilseck; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Box size effects are negligible for solvation free energies of neutral solutes.

Authors:  Sreeja Parameswaran; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Refining Protein Penetration into the Lipid Bilayer Using Fluorescence Quenching and Molecular Dynamics Simulations: The Case of Diphtheria Toxin Translocation Domain.

Authors:  Alexander Kyrychenko; Nathan M Lim; Victor Vasquez-Montes; Mykola V Rodnin; J Alfredo Freites; Linh P Nguyen; Douglas J Tobias; David L Mobley; Alexey S Ladokhin
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Lin Frank Song; Nupur Bansal; Zheng Zheng; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Accounting for the Central Role of Interfacial Water in Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Ido Y Ben-Shalom; Zhixiong Lin; Brian K Radak; Charles Lin; Woody Sherman; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Parameterization of an effective potential for protein-ligand binding from host-guest affinity data.

Authors:  Lauren Wickstrom; Nanjie Deng; Peng He; Ahmet Mentes; Crystal Nguyen; Michael K Gilson; Tom Kurtzman; Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 2.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.