Literature DB >> 33622886

Risk Factors Associated With Complications After Unilateral Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A French Prospective Multicenter Study.

Jacques Dauplat1, Emilie Thivat1, Philippe Rouanet2, Emmanuel Delay3, Krishna Clough4, Jean-Luc Verhaeghe5, Ines Raoust6, Marie Bannier7, Perig Lemasurier8, Christophe Pomel9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: For women who have undergone a mastectomy, breast reconstruction provides psychological as well as aesthetic benefits. Thus, many patients ask for an immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). The present study focuses on risk factors assiociated with complications after IBR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A national prospective study (2007-2009) was conducted on 404 patients who underwent an unilateral IBR: 205 implants alone (IA) including 46 tissue expanders, 91 latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flaps with implant (LDI), 78 autologous latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flaps (LD), and 30 autologous transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps (TRAM). Outcomes concerned major and minor complications, as well as early and late complications.
RESULTS: Related risks of complications were different according to the IBR technique. Major complications rate remained moderate and concerned 15% of patients. Obesity and diabetes significantly increased the incidence of major complications.
CONCLUSION: To reduce complication rate, the risk factors associated with each type of IBR should be taken into account. Copyright
© 2021, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; breast reconstruction; complications; mastectomy; morbidity; risk factors

Year:  2021        PMID: 33622886      PMCID: PMC8045092          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  38 in total

1.  Does Age Matter? Estimating Risks of Locoregional Recurrence After Breast-conservative Surgery.

Authors:  Gianluca Vanni; Marco Materazzo; Marco Pellicciaro; Ljuba Morando; Ilaria Portarena; Lucia Anemona; Maria Rolando D'Angelillo; Rosaria Barbarino; Agostino Chiaravalloti; Rosaria Meucci; Tommaso Perretta; Camilla Deiana; Paolo Orsaria; Jonathan Caspi; Chiara Adriana Pistolese; Oreste Claudio Buonomo
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Risk analysis and stratification of surgical morbidity after immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  John P Fischer; Ari M Wes; Charles T Tuggle; Joseph M Serletti; Liza C Wu
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  [Current position of breast reconstruction in oncology].

Authors:  P Rouanet
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil       Date:  2002-12

4.  Mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy. A new option for patients with operable invasive breast cancer. Results of a 20 years single institution study.

Authors:  E Monrigal; J Dauplat; P Gimbergues; G Le Bouedec; M Peyronie; J L Achard; P Chollet; M A Mouret-Reynier; J M Nabholtz; C Pomel
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  500 Consecutive patients with free TRAM flap breast reconstruction: a single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Stephen Vega; James M Smartt; Shao Jiang; Jesse C Selber; Christopher J M Brooks; H Raul Herrera; Joseph M Serletti
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  [Morbidity of the trans rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap in breast reconstruction. Retrospective study about 125 patients].

Authors:  P Gimbergues; G Le Bouedec; C Pomel; M Janny-Peyronie; J Dauplat
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  2003-06

7.  Oncological outcome after immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer: a long-term study.

Authors:  K Sandelin; M Wickman; A M Billgren
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk.

Authors:  Colleen M McCarthy; Babak J Mehrara; Elyn Riedel; Kristen Davidge; Akili Hinson; Joseph J Disa; Peter G Cordeiro; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  [Prevention of seroma by quilting suture after harvesting latissimus dorsi flap. The "Chippendale" technic].

Authors:  H Gisquet; E Delay; P-O Paradol; G Toussoun; T Delaporte; D Perol
Journal:  Ann Chir Plast Esthet       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 0.660

10.  Risk Factors for Complications after Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Authors:  Felix J Paprottka; Christopher L Schlett; Rosalia Luketina; Karolin Paprottka; Dalius Klimas; Christine Radtke; Detlev Hebebrand
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.860

View more
  3 in total

1.  Breakthrough in breast reconstruction in the context of COVID-19: safety and efficiency of endoscopic breast reconstruction at a day surgery center.

Authors:  Jiao Zhou; Xinran Liu; Yu Feng; Juan Li; Xiangquan Qin; Yixuan Huang; Huanzuo Yang; Mengxue Qiu; Yang Liu; Hongsheng Ma; Qing Lv; Zhenggui Du
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-08

2.  Implant-based versus Autologous Reconstruction after Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Justin M Broyles; Ethan M Balk; Gaelen P Adam; Wangnan Cao; Monika Reddy Bhuma; Shivani Mehta; Laura S Dominici; Andrea L Pusic; Ian J Saldanha
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-03-11

3.  Immediate Prosthesis Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Between Ambulatory Surgery Versus Traditional Hospitalization Based on the Propensity Score Matching Method.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; Aoxiang Chen; Chaoqi Liu; Bin Zhang
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 2.708

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.