Literature DB >> 34527560

Breakthrough in breast reconstruction in the context of COVID-19: safety and efficiency of endoscopic breast reconstruction at a day surgery center.

Jiao Zhou1, Xinran Liu1, Yu Feng1, Juan Li1, Xiangquan Qin1, Yixuan Huang1, Huanzuo Yang1, Mengxue Qiu1, Yang Liu1, Hongsheng Ma1, Qing Lv1, Zhenggui Du1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recently years, breast endoscopic reconstruction surgery is becoming increasingly popular. And we have explored a series of endoscopic breast reconstruction procedures and applied it to our day surgery under the epidemic control of the novel coronavirus.
METHODS: The present study was a retrospective analysis. Patients who underwent unilateral breast endoscopic reconstruction surgery in the West China Hospital from April 2017 to February 2021 were included in the study. Patients were divided into the following three groups: ward exploration period (WEP), ward maturation period (WMP), and day surgery period (DSP), respectively. We compared the results of postoperative complications, hospitalization costs, operation time, and BREAST-Q (a patient-reported outcome instrument measuring health-related quality-of-life and patient satisfaction in breast surgery) scale scores among the three groups of patients.
RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were included (WEP n=30, WMP n=14, DSP n=22). Four people refused to complete the BREAST-Q scale, and five patients missed complication record sheets. Patients in the DSP and WMP groups had slightly higher postoperative satisfaction with their breasts than WEP, but there was no statistically significant difference (3 months postoperatively: WEP vs. WMP =0.515, WEP vs. DSP =0.418, WMP vs. DSP =0.982). On the postoperative BREAST-Q scale scores of psychosocial, sexual life and chest well-being, patients with DSP scored slightly higher than those with WEP versus WMP, but there was no statistically significant difference. The incidence of postoperative complications was generally higher in the WEP group than in the WMP and DSP groups, but there was no statistically significant incidence of either major or minor complications (P=1.000). With the use of prostheses and mesh, patients in the DSP group had lower hospitalization costs than other two groups. In terms of operative time, patients in the WMP and DSP groups had shorter operative times compared with the WEP group, and the results were statistically significant (WEP vs. WMP =0.000, WEP vs. DSP =0.000, WMP vs. DSP =0.243).
CONCLUSIONS: We believe that performing our newly developed endoscopic breast reconstructive surgery at a day surgery center is safe and reliable. 2021 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Day surgery; Huaxi hole 1; breast reconstruction; endoscopy; inverse sequence method

Year:  2021        PMID: 34527560      PMCID: PMC8411074          DOI: 10.21037/gs-21-405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  24 in total

1.  [Possibilities and limits of breast conserving therapy of carcinoma].

Authors:  K Thomsen
Journal:  Arch Gynakol       Date:  1975-11-18

2.  Psychological symptoms of breast cancer survivors: a comparison with matched healthy controls and the association with cancer-related stress and coping.

Authors:  Evangelos C Karademas; Katerina Argyropoulou; Spyridoula Karvelis
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2007

3.  Ambulatory mastectomy.

Authors:  William C Dooley
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Bilateral immediate two-stage breast reconstruction in patients with unilateral breast cancer: Outcomes analysis and risk assessment.

Authors:  Cemile Nurdan Ozturk; Can Ozturk; Allison Soucise; Nabiha Ahsan; Joseph Kuhn; Mary Platek; Robert Lohman; Wong Moon; Raffi Gurunian
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Modified radical mastectomy in the individualized treatment of breast carcinoma.

Authors:  N C Delarue; W D Anderson; J Starr
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1969-07

6.  Immediate prepectoral implant reconstruction using TiLOOP Bra Pocket results in improved patient satisfaction over dual plane reconstruction.

Authors:  E-Ern Ian Ng; Gaik Si Quah; Susannah Graham; Kavitha Kanesalingam; Farid Meybodi; Jeremy Hsu; Elisabeth E Elder; James French
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 1.872

7.  Partial mastectomy and limited axillary dissection performed as a same day surgical procedure in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  M H Seltzer
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar

8.  Robotic versus conventional nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate gel implant breast reconstruction in the management of breast cancer- A case control comparison study with analysis of clinical outcome, medical cost, and patient-reported cosmetic results.

Authors:  Hung-Wen Lai; Shou-Tung Chen; Chi Wei Mok; Ying-Jen Lin; Hwa-Koon Wu; Shih-Lung Lin; Dar-Ren Chen; Shou-Jen Kuo
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Estimating worldwide effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and population mobility patterns using a multiple-event study.

Authors:  Nikolaos Askitas; Konstantinos Tatsiramos; Bertrand Verheyden
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Diagnosis and management of toxic shock syndrome after breast reconstructive procedures with silicone implants.

Authors:  Minseo Kim; Inhoe Ku; Ung Sik Jin
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2021-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.