Literature DB >> 18520873

Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk.

Colleen M McCarthy1, Babak J Mehrara, Elyn Riedel, Kristen Davidge, Akili Hinson, Joseph J Disa, Peter G Cordeiro, Andrea L Pusic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complications following postmastectomy reconstruction can cause significant morbidity. The compound effect of individual risk factors on the development of complications following expander/implant reconstruction has not, however, been well delineated. This study evaluated the impact of clinical risk factors to predict complications following postmastectomy expander/implant reconstruction.
METHODS: From 2003 through 2004, 1170 expander/implant reconstructions were performed at a single center. A prospectively maintained database was reviewed. Variables including age, smoking status, body mass index, history of diabetes, hypertension, chemotherapy and/or radiation, as well as timing and laterality of reconstruction were evaluated. The primary endpoint was the development of a complication; the secondary endpoint was failure of reconstruction.
RESULTS: Over the 2 year study period, 1170 expander/implant reconstructions were performed in 884 patients. The odds of developing complications was 2.2 times greater in smokers (p < 0.001) and 2.5 times greater in women over 65 (p = 0.008). Patients who were obese were at nearly two times the odds of having complications (p = 0.02), as were patients with hypertension (p = 0.02). Similarly, the odds of reconstructive failure were five times greater in smokers (p < 0.001). Age was not a significant predictor of reconstructive failure (p = 0.09); yet, failure was nearly seven times greater in obese patients (p < 0.001), and four more times likely in those who were hypertensive (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Smoking, obesity, hypertension, and age over 65 were independent risk factors for perioperative complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction. Smoking, obesity, and hypertension were similarly associated with reconstructive failure. This information can be used to evaluate overall procedural risks and individualize reconstructive options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18520873     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817151c4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  84 in total

Review 1.  Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Sophocles H Voineskos; Simon G Frank; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

2.  Single-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Anatomical Silicone-Based Implant and The Hammock Technique of Dermal-Muscle Flap in Large and Ptotic breasts: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Mohamed A Ellabban; Ahmed Nawar; Hala Milad; Mohammed G Ellabban
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Current opinions on indications and algorithms for acellular dermal matrix use in primary prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael M Vu; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

4.  Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on wound complications after breast surgery.

Authors:  Marquita R Decker; David Y Greenblatt; Jeff Havlena; Lee G Wilke; Caprice C Greenberg; Heather B Neuman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomies with Implant-Based Reconstructions Followed Long Term: A Consecutive Series of 185 Patients.

Authors:  Karin Isaksson; Brita Arver; Matteo Bottai; Andreas Pettersson; Marie Wickman; Kerstin Sandelin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Re: Naoum et al., Optimal breast reconstruction type for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy followed by radiation therapy.

Authors:  Sadaf Alipour
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Andri Thorarinsson; Victoria Fröjd; Lars Kölby; Mattias Lidén; Anna Elander; Hans Mark
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

8.  Differences in breast aesthetic outcomes due to radiation: A validated, quantitative analysis of expander-implant reconstruction.

Authors:  Lauren M Mioton; Jessica Gaido; William Small; Neil A Fine; John Y Kim
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2013

9.  Risk Factors Associated With Complications After Unilateral Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A French Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Jacques Dauplat; Emilie Thivat; Philippe Rouanet; Emmanuel Delay; Krishna Clough; Jean-Luc Verhaeghe; Ines Raoust; Marie Bannier; Perig Lemasurier; Christophe Pomel
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Impact of different type of cancer treatment on the effectiveness of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Joanna Szloch; Elżbieta Marczyk; Marta Kołodziej-Rzepa; Andrzej L Komorowski
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.