Literature DB >> 24074811

Risk analysis and stratification of surgical morbidity after immediate breast reconstruction.

John P Fischer1, Ari M Wes, Charles T Tuggle, Joseph M Serletti, Liza C Wu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical complications after breast reconstruction can be associated with significant morbidity, dissatisfaction, and cost. We used the ACS-NSQIP datasets from 2005 to 2011 to derive predictors of morbidity and to stratify risk after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). STUDY
DESIGN: Surgical complications after implant and autologous reconstruction were assessed using the ACS-NSQIP 2005 to 2011 datasets. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and operative factors were associated with the likelihood of experiencing a surgical complication. A "model cohort" of 12,129 patients was randomly selected from the study cohort to derive predictors. Weighted odds ratios derived from logistic regression analysis were used to create a composite risk score and to stratify patients. The remaining one-third of the cohort (n = 6,065) were used as the "validation cohort" to assess the accuracy value of the risk model.
RESULTS: On adjusted analysis, autologous reconstruction (odds ratio [OR] 1.41, p < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ≥ 3 (OR 1.25, p = 0.004), class I obesity (OR 1.38, p < 0.001), class II obesity (OR 1.91, p < 0.001), class III obesity (OR 1.70, p < 0.001), and active smoking (OR 1.46, p < 0.001) were associated with complications. Risk factors were weighted and patients were stratified into low (0 to 2, n = 9,133, risk = 7.14%), intermediate (3 to 4, n = 1,935, risk = 10.90%), high (5 to 7, n = 1,024, risk = 16.70%), and very high (8 to 9, n = 37, risk = 27.02%) risk categories based on their total risk score (p < 0.001). Internal validation of the "model cohort" using the "validation cohort" was performed demonstrating accurate prediction of risk across groups: low (7.1% vs 7.1%, respectively, p = 0.9), intermediate (10.9% vs 12.0%, respectively, p = 0.38), high (16.7% vs 16.8%, respectively, p = 0.95), and very high (27.0% vs 30.0%, respectively, p = 1.0).
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical complications after IBR are related to preoperatively identifiable factors that can be used to accurately risk stratify patients, which may assist with counseling, selection, and perioperative decision-making.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASA; American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI; IBR; IBRRAS; OR; body mass index; immediate breast reconstruction; immediate breast reconstruction risk assessment scale; odds ratio

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24074811     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  18 in total

1.  How Informed Is the Decision About Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy?: A Prospective, Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Clara Nan-Hi Lee; Peter Anthony Ubel; Allison M Deal; Lillian Burdick Blizard; Karen R Sepucha; David W Ollila; Michael Patrick Pignone
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Complications in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: One-year Outcomes of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC) Study.

Authors:  Edwin G Wilkins; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; John Y Kim; Richard J Greco; Ji Qi; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Coordination of Care for Breast Reconstruction Patients: A Provider Survey.

Authors:  Jennifer L Milucky; Allison M Deal; Carey Anders; Rebecca Wu; Richard Sean McNally; Clara N Lee
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Surgical decision making in conservative mastectomies.

Authors:  Giuseppe Catanuto; Nicola Rocco; Maurizio Bruno Nava
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

Review 5.  Combined deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap with vascularized groin lymph node transplant for treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Mark V Schaverien; Edward I Chang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

6.  Effect of Patient Age on Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: Results from a Multicenter Prospective Study.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Risk Factors Associated With Complications After Unilateral Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A French Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Jacques Dauplat; Emilie Thivat; Philippe Rouanet; Emmanuel Delay; Krishna Clough; Jean-Luc Verhaeghe; Ines Raoust; Marie Bannier; Perig Lemasurier; Christophe Pomel
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Breast cancer treatment among African American women in north St. Louis, Missouri.

Authors:  Shahnjayla K Connors; Melody S Goodman; Lailea Noel; Neeraja N Chavakula; Dwayne Butler; Sandi Kenkel; Cheryl Oliver; Isaac McCullough; Sarah Gehlert
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 9.  Scoping Review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Plastic Surgery Research.

Authors:  Haley F M Augustine; Jiayi Hu; Zainab Najarali; Matthew McRae
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 0.947

10.  The Impact of Delaying Breast Reconstruction on Patient Expectations and Health-Related Quality of Life: An Analysis Using the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Alexander Morzycki; Joseph Corkum; Nadim Joukhadar; Osama Samargandi; Jason G Williams; Simon G Frank
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 0.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.