Literature DB >> 35121423

Optical coherence elastography for assessing the influence of intraocular pressure on elastic wave dispersion in the cornea.

Michael G Sun1, Taeyoon Son1, Joseph Crutison2, Victor Guaiquil3, Shujun Lin2, Lara Nammari2, Dieter Klatt2, Xincheng Yao1, Mark I Rosenblatt1, Thomas J Royston4.   

Abstract

The cornea is a highly specialized organ that relies on its mechanical stiffness to maintain its aspheric geometry and refractive power, and corneal diseases such as keratoconus have been linked to abnormal tissue stiffness and biomechanics. Dynamic optical coherence elastography (OCE) is a clinically promising non-contact and non-destructive imaging technique that can provide measurements of corneal tissue stiffness directly in vivo. The method relies on the concepts of elastography where shear waves are generated and imaged within a tissue to obtain mechanical properties such as tissue stiffness. The accuracy of OCE-based measurements is ultimately dependent on the mathematical theories used to model wave behavior in the tissue of interest. In the cornea, elastic waves propagate as guided wave modes which are highly dispersive and can be mathematically complex to model. While recent groups have developed detailed theories for estimating corneal tissue properties from guided wave behavior, the effects of intraocular pressure (IOP)-induced prestress have not yet been considered. It is known that prestress alone can strongly influence wave behavior, in addition to the associated non-linear changes in tissue properties. This present study shows that failure to account for the effects of prestress may result in overestimations of the corneal shear moduli, particularly at high IOPs. We first examined the potential effects of IOP and IOP-induced prestress using a combination of approximate mathematical theories describing wave behavior in thin plates with observations made from data published in the OCE literature. Through wave dispersion analysis, we deduce that IOP introduces a tensile hoop stress and may also influence an elastic foundational effect that were observable in the low-frequency components of the dispersion curves. These effects were incorporated into recently developed models of wave behavior in nearly incompressible, transversely isotropic (NITI) materials. Fitting of the modified NITI model with ex vivo porcine corneal data demonstrated that incorporation of the effects of IOP resulted in reduced estimates of corneal shear moduli. We believe this demonstrates that overestimation of corneal stiffness occurs if IOP is not taken into consideration. Our work may be helpful in separating inherent corneal stiffness properties that are independent of IOP; changes in these properties and in IOP are distinct, clinically relevant issues that affect the cornea health.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal stiffness; Intraocular pressure; Optical coherence elastography; Shear modulus; Shear wave; Wave dispersion

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35121423      PMCID: PMC8904295          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  49 in total

Review 1.  Concise reviews: the role of biomechanics in the limbal stem cell niche: new insights for our understanding of this structure.

Authors:  Philipp Eberwein; Thomas Reinhard
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.277

2.  Nonlinear guided wave propagation in prestressed plates.

Authors:  Annamaria Pau; Francesco Lanza di Scalea
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Assessing the effects of riboflavin/UV-A crosslinking on porcine corneal mechanical anisotropy with optical coherence elastography.

Authors:  Manmohan Singh; Jiasong Li; Zhaolong Han; Raksha Raghunathan; Achuth Nair; Chen Wu; Chih-Hao Liu; Salavat Aglyamov; Michael D Twa; Kirill V Larin
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Shear wave velocity is sensitive to changes in muscle stiffness that occur independently from changes in force.

Authors:  Michel Bernabei; Sabrina S M Lee; Eric J Perreault; Thomas G Sandercock
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-09-26

Review 5.  Translating ocular biomechanics into clinical practice: current state and future prospects.

Authors:  Michaël J A Girard; William J Dupps; Mani Baskaran; Giuliano Scarcelli; Seok H Yun; Harry A Quigley; Ian A Sigal; Nicholas G Strouthidis
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.424

6.  Stem cell migration and mechanotransduction on linear stiffness gradient hydrogels.

Authors:  William J Hadden; Jennifer L Young; Andrew W Holle; Meg L McFetridge; Du Yong Kim; Philip Wijesinghe; Hermes Taylor-Weiner; Jessica H Wen; Andrew R Lee; Karen Bieback; Ba-Ngu Vo; David D Sampson; Brendan F Kennedy; Joachim P Spatz; Adam J Engler; Yu Suk Choi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Biomechanical model of the human cornea: considering shear stiffness and regional variation of collagen anisotropy and density.

Authors:  Charles Whitford; Harald Studer; Craig Boote; Keith M Meek; Ahmed Elsheikh
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2014-11-11

8.  Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls.

Authors:  Riccardo Vinciguerra; Salwah Rehman; Neeru A Vallabh; Mark Batterbury; Gabriela Czanner; Anshoo Choudhary; Robert Cheeseman; Ahmed Elsheikh; Colin E Willoughby
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Correlation between corneal thickness, keratometry, age, and differential pressure difference in healthy eyes.

Authors:  Ahmet Colakoglu; Iffet Emel Colakoglu; Cemile Banu Cosar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Heartbeat OCE: corneal biomechanical response to simulated heartbeat pulsation measured by optical coherence elastography.

Authors:  Achuth Nair; Manmohan Singh; Salavat R Aglyamov; Kirill V Larin
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.170

View more
  2 in total

1.  Torsional wave elastography to assess the mechanical properties of the cornea.

Authors:  Jorge Torres; Inas H Faris; Antonio Callejas; Felisa Reyes-Ortega; Juan Melchor; Miguel Gonzalez-Andrades; Guillermo Rus
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 2.  The combined importance of finite dimensions, anisotropy, and pre-stress in acoustoelastography.

Authors:  Joseph Crutison; Michael Sun; Thomas J Royston
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.840

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.