Literature DB >> 22366703

Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure differences between an air-puff tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Laura Tranchina1, Marco Lombardo, Francesco Oddone, Sebastiano Serrao, Domenico Schiano Lomoriello, Pietro Ducoli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate the influence of corneal properties on intraocular pressure (IOP) differences between an air-puff tonometer (NT530P; Nidek) and the Goldmann applanation tonometer (Haag-Streit). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The influence of central corneal thickness (CCT), keratometry, and Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert) measurements of corneal viscoelasticity [corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF)] on IOP differences between tonometers was evaluated.
RESULTS: The CRF was calculated to be the best predictor of the differences in IOP readings between tonometers (r2=0.23; P<0.001), followed by CCT (r2=0.15; P=0.003) and CH (r2=0.14; P=0.003). Keratometry performed very poorly as lone predictor of IOP differences. In a multiple regression model, CRF, CH, and CCT together accounted for 25% (r2=0.25; P<0.01) of the variance in IOP reading differences between tonometers.
CONCLUSIONS: Corneal resistance to applanation induced by either contact or noncontact tonometers was calculated to be the most determinant factor in influencing IOP differences between applanation tonometers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22366703     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31824cafc9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of intraocular pressure as measured by three different non-contact tonometers and goldmann applanation tonometer for non-glaucomatous subjects.

Authors:  Seung Pil Bang; Chong Eun Lee; Yu Cheol Kim
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.209

2.  Transient viscous response of the human cornea probed with the Surface Force Apparatus.

Authors:  Bruno Zappone; Navinkumar J Patil; Marco Lombardo; Giuseppe Lombardo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Intraocular Pressure Based on Dynamic Bidirectional Applanation and Air-puff Tonometry: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Ayse E Bahadir Kilavuzoglu; Cemile B Cosar; Ali Rc Celebi; Ugur E Al Parmak
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2019 May-Aug

4.  Correlation between corneal thickness, keratometry, age, and differential pressure difference in healthy eyes.

Authors:  Ahmet Colakoglu; Iffet Emel Colakoglu; Cemile Banu Cosar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Differential impact of prostaglandin analogues on agreement of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by Goldmann applanation, rebound, and noncontact tonometry.

Authors:  Younhea Jung; Hyun Suh; Jung Il Moon
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Modification of Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure Following Non-Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy.

Authors:  María Dolores Díaz-Barreda; Ignacio Sánchez-Marín; Ana Boned-Murillo; Itziar Pérez-Navarro; Juana Martínez; Elena Pardina-Claver; Diana Pérez; Francisco Javier Ascaso; Juan Ibáñez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.