Literature DB >> 33571980

H2RSPET: a 0.5 mm resolution high-sensitivity small-animal PET scanner, a simulation study.

Youfang Lai1, Qian Wang2, Shiwei Zhou1, Zhaoheng Xie2, Jinyi Qi2, Simon R Cherry2, Mingwu Jin1, Yujie Chi1, Junwei Du2.   

Abstract

With the goal of developing a total-body small-animal PET system with a high spatial resolution of ∼0.5 mm and a high sensitivity >10% for mouse/rat studies, we simulated four scanners using the graphical processing unit-based Monte Carlo simulation package (gPET) and compared their performance in terms of spatial resolution and sensitivity. We also investigated the effect of depth-of-interaction (DOI) resolution on the spatial resolution. All the scanners are built upon 128 DOI encoding dual-ended readout detectors with lutetium yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) arrays arranged in 8 detector rings. The solid angle coverages of the four scanners are all ∼0.85 steradians. Each LYSO element has a cross-section of 0.44 × 0.44 mm2 and the pitch size of the LYSO arrays are all 0.5 mm. The four scanners can be divided into two groups: (1) H2RS110-C10 and H2RS110-C20 with 40 × 40 LYSO arrays, a ring diameter of 110 mm and axial length of 167 mm, and (2) H2RS160-C10 and H2RS160-C20 with 60 × 60 LYSO arrays, a diameter of 160 mm and axial length of 254 mm. C10 and C20 denote the crystal thickness of 10 and 20 mm, respectively. The simulation results show that all scanners have a spatial resolution better than 0.5 mm at the center of the field-of-view (FOV). The radial resolution strongly depends on the DOI resolution and radial offset, but not the axial resolution and tangential resolution. Comparing the C10 and C20 designs, the former provides better resolution, especially at positions away from the center of the FOV, whereas the latter has 2× higher sensitivity (∼10% versus ∼20%). This simulation study provides evidence that the 110 mm systems are a good choice for total-body mouse studies at a lower cost, whereas the 160 mm systems are suited for both total-body mouse and rat studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33571980      PMCID: PMC8353984          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abe558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  53 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging.

Authors:  A F Chatziioannou; S R Cherry; Y Shao; R W Silverman; K Meadors; T H Farquhar; M Pedarsani; M E Phelps
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Improving depth-of-interaction resolution in pixellated PET detectors using neural networks.

Authors:  Artem Zatcepin; Marco Pizzichemi; Andrea Polesel; Marco Paganoni; Etiennette Auffray; Sibylle Ilse Ziegler; Negar Omidvari
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Imaging performance of LabPET APD-based digital PET scanners for pre-clinical research.

Authors:  Mélanie Bergeron; Jules Cadorette; Marc-André Tetrault; Jean-François Beaudoin; Jean-Daniel Leroux; Réjean Fontaine; Roger Lecomte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Fundamental Limits of Spatial Resolution in PET.

Authors:  William W Moses
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 1.455

5.  Non-invasive determination of blood input function to compute rate of myocardial glucose uptake from dynamic FDG PET images of rat heart in vivo: comparative study between the inferior vena cava and the left ventricular blood pool with spill over and partial volume corrections.

Authors:  Qiao Huang; James C Massey; Krzysztof Mińczuk; Jie Li; Bijoy K Kundu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Recent developments in PET detector technology.

Authors:  Tom K Lewellen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Image-derived input function from the vena cava for 18F-FDG PET studies in rats and mice.

Authors:  Bernard Lanz; Carole Poitry-Yamate; Rolf Gruetter
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  DigiPET: sub-millimeter spatial resolution small-animal PET imaging using thin monolithic scintillators.

Authors:  Samuel España; Radoslaw Marcinkowski; Vincent Keereman; Stefaan Vandenberghe; Roel Van Holen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Design and performance of SIAT aPET: a uniform high-resolution small animal PET scanner using dual-ended readout detectors.

Authors:  Zhonghua Kuang; Xiaohui Wang; Ning Ren; San Wu; Juan Gao; Tianyi Zeng; Dongfang Gao; Chunhui Zhang; Ziru Sang; Zhanli Hu; Junwei Du; Dong Liang; Xin Liu; Hairong Zheng; Yongfeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Increase of long-term 'diabesity' risk, hyperphagia, and altered hypothalamic neuropeptide expression in neonatally overnourished 'small-for-gestational-age' (SGA) rats.

Authors:  Karen Schellong; Uta Neumann; Rebecca C Rancourt; Andreas Plagemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Performance of Dual-Ended Readout PET Detectors Based on BGO Arrays and BaSO4 Reflector.

Authors:  Junwei Du
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-12

Review 2.  Recent Technical Advances in Accelerating the Clinical Translation of Small Animal Brain Imaging: Hybrid Imaging, Deep Learning, and Transcriptomics.

Authors:  Wuwei Ren; Bin Ji; Yihui Guan; Lei Cao; Ruiqing Ni
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.