Literature DB >> 24442278

Imaging performance of LabPET APD-based digital PET scanners for pre-clinical research.

Mélanie Bergeron, Jules Cadorette, Marc-André Tetrault, Jean-François Beaudoin, Jean-Daniel Leroux, Réjean Fontaine, Roger Lecomte.   

Abstract

The LabPET is an avalanche photodiode (APD) based digital PET scanner with quasi-individual detector read-out and highly parallel electronic architecture for high-performance in vivo molecular imaging of small animals. The scanner is based on LYSO and LGSO scintillation crystals (2×2×12/14 mm3), assembled side-by-side in phoswich pairs read out by an APD. High spatial resolution is achieved through the individual and independent read-out of an individual APD detector for recording impinging annihilation photons. The LabPET exists in three versions, LabPET4 (3.75 cm axial length), LabPET8 (7.5 cm axial length) and LabPET12 (11.4 cm axial length). This paper focuses on the systematic characterization of the three LabPET versions using two different energy window settings to implement a high-efficiency mode (250–650 keV) and a high-resolution mode (350–650 keV) in the most suitable operating conditions. Prior to measurements, a global timing alignment of the scanners and optimization of the APD operating bias have been carried out. Characteristics such as spatial resolution, absolute sensitivity, count rate performance and image quality have been thoroughly investigated following the NEMA NU 4-2008 protocol. Phantom and small animal images were acquired to assess the scanners' suitability for the most demanding imaging tasks in preclinical biomedical research. The three systems achieve the same radial FBP spatial resolution at 5 mm from the field-of-view center: 1.65/3.40 mm (FWHM/FWTM) for an energy threshold of 250 keV and 1.51/2.97 mm for an energy threshold of 350 keV. The absolute sensitivity for an energy window of 250–650 keV is 1.4%/2.6%/4.3% for LabPET4/8/12, respectively. The best count rate performance peaking at 362 kcps is achieved by the LabPET12 with an energy window of 250–650 keV and a mouse phantom (2.5 cm diameter) at an activity of 2.4 MBq ml−1. With the same phantom, the scatter fraction for all scanners is about 17% for an energy threshold of 250 keV and 10% for an energy threshold of 350 keV. The results obtained with two energy window settings confirm the relevance of high-efficiency and high-resolution operating modes to take full advantage of the imaging capabilities of the LabPET scanners for molecular imaging applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24442278     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/3/661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of the novel estrogen receptor PET tracer 4-fluoro-11β-methoxy-16α-[(18)F]fluoroestradiol (4FMFES) by PET imaging in a breast cancer murine model.

Authors:  Michel Paquette; Serge Phoenix; René Ouellet; Réjean Langlois; Johan E van Lier; Eric E Turcotte; Francois Bénard; Roger Lecomte
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Performance evaluation of the mouse version of the LabPET II PET scanner.

Authors:  Émilie Gaudin; Christian Thibaudeau; Louis Arpin; Jean-Daniel Leroux; Maxime Toussaint; Jean-Francois Beaudoin; Jules Cadorette; Maxime Paillé; Catherine M Pepin; Konin Koua; Jonathan Bouchard; Nicolas Viscogliosi; Caroline Paulin; Réjean Fontaine; Roger Lecomte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  H2RSPET: a 0.5 mm resolution high-sensitivity small-animal PET scanner, a simulation study.

Authors:  Youfang Lai; Qian Wang; Shiwei Zhou; Zhaoheng Xie; Jinyi Qi; Simon R Cherry; Mingwu Jin; Yujie Chi; Junwei Du
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Development of a PET scanner for simultaneously imaging small animals with MRI and PET.

Authors:  Christopher J Thompson; Andrew L Goertzen; Jonathan D Thiessen; Daryl Bishop; Greg Stortz; Piotr Kozlowski; Fabrice Retière; Xuezhu Zhang; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Initial PET performance evaluation of a preclinical insert for PET/MRI with digital SiPM technology.

Authors:  David Schug; Christoph Lerche; Bjoern Weissler; Pierre Gebhardt; Benjamin Goldschmidt; Jakob Wehner; Peter Michael Dueppenbecker; Andre Salomon; Patrick Hallen; Fabian Kiessling; Volkmar Schulz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Comparison of different quantification methods for 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains.

Authors:  Silvana Prando; Camila de Godoi Carneiro; Cecil Chow Robilotta; Marcelo Tatit Sapienza
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 7.  A role for artificial intelligence in molecular imaging of infection and inflammation.

Authors:  Johannes Schwenck; Manfred Kneilling; Niels P Riksen; Christian la Fougère; Douwe J Mulder; Riemer J H A Slart; Erik H J G Aarntzen
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2022-09-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.