| Literature DB >> 33552446 |
Francisca Contreras1, Christina Nutschel2, Laura Beust1, Mehdi D Davari1, Holger Gohlke2,3, Ulrich Schwaneberg1,4.
Abstract
Cellulases are industrially important enzymes, e.g., in the production of bioethanol, in pulp and paper industry, feedstock, and textile. Thermostability is often a prerequisite for high process stability and improving thermostability without affecting specific activities at lower temperatures is challenging and often time-consuming. Protein engineering strategies that combine experimental and computational are emerging in order to reduce experimental screening efforts and speed up enzyme engineering campaigns. Constraint Network Analysis (CNA) is a promising computational method that identifies beneficial positions in enzymes to improve thermostability. In this study, we compare CNA and directed evolution in the identification of beneficial positions in order to evaluate the potential of CNA in protein engineering campaigns (e.g., in the identification phase of KnowVolution). We engineered the industrially relevant endoglucanase EGLII from Penicillium verruculosum towards increased thermostability. From the CNA approach, six variants were obtained with an up to 2-fold improvement in thermostability. The overall experimental burden was reduced to 40% utilizing the CNA method in comparison to directed evolution. On a variant level, the success rate was similar for both strategies, with 0.27% and 0.18% improved variants in the epPCR and CNA-guided library, respectively. In essence, CNA is an effective method for identification of positions that improve thermostability.Entities:
Keywords: AU, absorbance units; CMC, carboxymethyl cellulose; CNA, Constraint Network Analysis; Cellulase; Constraint network analysis; EGLII, endoglucanase II; GH5 endoglucanase; HTS, high-throughput screening; KnowVolution; MD, molecular dynamics; MTP, 96-well microtiter plates; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; Protein engineering; SSM, site-saturation mutagenesis; Thermostability
Year: 2020 PMID: 33552446 PMCID: PMC7822948 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.12.034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Struct Biotechnol J ISSN: 2001-0370 Impact factor: 7.271
Fig. 1Protein engineering strategies for thermal stabilization of EGLII. Center: KnowVolution strategy with its four Phases (I, II, III, and IV); Left: A directed evolution campaign was performed in the complete endoglucanase EGLII gene by ep–PCR. Right: A semi-rational library design was performed, starting with a computational screening by the CNA approach, followed by an evolutionary conservation analysis, and finally, an SSM library of the 18 predicted “structural weak spots”.
Fig. 2EGLII variants obtained from ep-PCR library. (A) Fifteen variants of EGLII with a significant thermostability improvement compared to the EGLII wild type. The improvement is defined as the ratio between the residual activity of the EGLII variants and the EGLII wild type, in AU. Given is the mean over experiments performed in biological replicates (n = 3). Error bars denote the standard error of the mean. (B) Representation of substituted positions (yellow sticks) in EGLII wildtype obtained from the ep–PCR library. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 3Prediction of the thermal unfolding pathway, local rigidity, and weak spots of wildtype EGLII. (A) Thermal unfolding pathway of wildtype EGLII (PDB ID: 5L9C [57]) showing four major phase transitions, T1-T4. The largest rigid cluster at each phase transition is represented as uniformly colored blue body. Helices that segregate from the largest rigid cluster at a phase transition are labeled. (B) Stability map rc for wildtype EGLII including Ecut values at which a rigid contact between two residues (i, j) is lost during the thermal unfolding simulation (upper triangle); the neighbor stability map rc for wildtype EGLII considers only the rigid contacts between two residues that are at most 5 Å apart from each other, with values for all other residue pairs colored gray (lower triangle). A red (blue) color indicates that contacts between residue pairs are more (less) rigid. α-helices and β-strands are depicted at the top. (C) Localization of predicted weak spots of wildtype EGLII (yellow spheres). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Phase transitions during the thermal unfolding simulation of wildtype EGLII, predicted weak spots, and their evolutionary conservation scores.
| T3 | Asp76 | Loop | 6 |
| T3 | Thr77 | αC | 1 |
| T3 | Gly92 | αC | 1 |
| T3 | Lys93 | Turn | 3 |
| T2 | Ile112 | Loop | |
| T2 | Ser114 | Loop | 6 |
| T2 | Phe129 | Turn | 7 |
| T2 | Lys130 | Turn | 2 |
| T2 | Leu134 | Turn | 2 |
| T3 | Gly181 | Beta Bridge | |
| T3 | Ala182 | Bend | |
| T2 | Asn189 | Loop | 5 |
| T2 | Thr190 | 3/10 helix | 1 |
| T2 | Cys221 | Loop | |
| T2 | Val222 | Bend | 7 |
| T2 | Ser240 | αG | 1 |
| T2 | Leu244 | Loop | 4 |
| T2 | Asn255 | Bend | |
| T2 | Ser256 | αH | 1 |
| T2 | Ser273 | Turn | 3 |
| T2 | Asp274 | Turn | |
| T2 | Asn299 | Turn | 3 |
| T2 | Gly300 | Loop | |
| T2 | Ser308 | αI | 4 |
| T2 | Thr312 | Turn | 1 |
Localization of the respective weak spot.
Values ≥ 8 are marked in bold and led to the exclusion of the weak spot from experimental analysis.
Variants identified in SSM libraries at predicted weak spots with increased thermostability.
| T2 | Turn | 312 | T312R | 1.99 ± 0.30 |
| T3 | αC | 77 | T77V | 1.25 ± 0.04 |
| T3 | αC | 77 | T77E | 1.24 ± 0.07 |
| T2 | Loop | 244 | L244R | 1.23 ± 0.09 |
| T2 | Bend | 222 | V222P | 1.16 ± 0.09 |
| T2 | αI | 308 | S308P | 1.16 ± 0.16 |
[a] Improvement is defined as the ratio between the residual activity of the EGLII variants and the EGLII wild type in AU. Given is the mean ± SEM over n = 3 experiments performed in biological replicates.