Literature DB >> 3342591

Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates.

S A Yoder1, R A Brand, D R Pedersen, T W O'Gorman.   

Abstract

Loosening is the most common long-term problem following total hip arthroplasty. Many factors, including patient selection, cement technique, femoral component placement, and prosthesis design reportedly affect the incidence of loosening. Theoretically, the location of the hip center of rotation substantially affects the load on the hip, and superior and lateral hip center location will result in higher loads than medial and inferior placement. Long-term follow-up studies (average, 9.1 years after surgery) using logistical regression analysis demonstrate significantly higher rates of femoral loosening with acetabular components placed in a superior and lateral (i.e., nonanatomic) position, compared with acetabular components placed in a nearly anatomic position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3342591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  58 in total

1.  Defining the normal acetabular vault in adult males and females using a novel three-dimensional model.

Authors:  Wael K Barsoum; Travis Smith; Leonard Buller; Feno Monaco; Alison Klika; Constantine Mavroudis; Jason Bryan
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects.

Authors:  Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo; Ana Cruz-Pardos; Eduardo Garcia-Rey; José Ortega-Chamarro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Six sigma analysis of minimally invasive acetabular arthroplasty: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  David A Heck; James B Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The influence of the centre of rotation on implant survival using a modular stem hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Francesco Traina; Marcello De Fine; Federico Biondi; Enrico Tassinari; Andrea Galvani; Aldo Toni
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  A multimodal approach in total hip arthroplasty preoperative templating.

Authors:  Massimiliano Marcucci; Pier Francesco Indelli; Leonardo Latella; Paolo Poli; Devin King
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Restoration of the hip center during THA performed for protrusio acetabuli is associated with better implant survival.

Authors:  Yaser M K Baghdadi; A Noelle Larson; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Can the acetabular position be derived from a pelvic frame of reference?

Authors:  Wael Dandachli; Amgad Nakhla; Farhad Iranpour; Vijayaraj Kannan; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Cementless acetabular component with or without upward placement in dysplasia hip: Early results from a prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  Zhiqi Zhang; Peihui Wu; Zhiyu Huang; Baoxi Yu; Hong Sun; Ming Fu; Yan Kang; Weiming Liao
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-06-27

9.  Reliability of measures used in radiographic evaluation of the adult hip.

Authors:  J A Bjarnason; A H Pripp; O Reikeras
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with severely dysplastic hips and a previous Schanz osteotomy of the femur: techniques, pitfalls, and long-term outcome.

Authors:  Antti Eskelinen; Ville Remes; Pekka Ylinen; Ilkka Helenius; Kaj Tallroth; Timo Paavilainen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.