Literature DB >> 18551348

Can the acetabular position be derived from a pelvic frame of reference?

Wael Dandachli1, Amgad Nakhla, Farhad Iranpour, Vijayaraj Kannan, Justin P Cobb.   

Abstract

Acetabular center positioning has an effect on hip function. However, reported clinical and plain radiographic methods are inaccurate and unreliable for ascertaining acetabular implant location. In an exploratory study we asked whether the normal acetabular position can be derived from simple radiographically measurable pelvic dimensions. We analyzed computed tomographic scans of 37 normal hips using a pelvic frame of reference centered on the ipsilateral anterior-superior iliac spine. We defined the x-, y-, and z-coordinates of the hip center (C(x),C(y),C(z)) as a percentage of the corresponding pelvic dimensions (D(x),D(y),D(z)). C(x)/D(x) averaged 9%, C(y)/D(y) 34%, and C(z)/D(z) 37%. These ratios had narrow distributions with small confidence intervals. Interobserver agreement tests showed a mean intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.95. We observed gender differences in the ratios of as much as 4%, which correspond to differences of as much as 9 mm in the hip center position. The ratios provide a simple and reliable way of deriving the normal position of the hip center from the pelvic dimensions alone. This gives the surgeon a simple way of planning where the hip center should be and may be particularly helpful in revision hip arthroplasty or in cases involving extensive osteophytes, dysplasia, or protrusio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18551348      PMCID: PMC2650052          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0336-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  24 in total

1.  Radiographic and non-invasive determination of the hip joint center location: effect on hip joint moments.

Authors:  R N Kirkwood; E G Culham; P Costigan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Optimizing acetabular component position to minimize impingement and reduce contact stress.

Authors:  D D D'Lima; P C Chen; C W Colwell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Isao Asayama; Samatchai Chamnongkich; Kathy J Simpson; Tracy L Kinsey; Ormonde M Mahoney
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system.

Authors:  J Cobb; J Henckel; P Gomes; S Harris; M Jakopec; F Rodriguez; A Barrett; B Davies
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-02

5.  Determination of the rotational center of the hip.

Authors:  Ulrich Boudriot; J Hilgert; F Hinrichs
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 6.  Impingement with total hip replacement.

Authors:  Aamer Malik; Aditya Maheshwari; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Locating the center of rotation of the hip.

Authors:  M H Fessy; A N'Diaye; J P Carret; L P Fischer
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Normal hip joint contact pressure distribution in single-leg standing--effect of gender and anatomic parameters.

Authors:  E Genda; N Iwasaki; G Li; B A MacWilliams; P J Barrance; E Y Chao
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Increased incidence of arthrosis in women could be related to femoral and pelvic shape.

Authors:  B Kersnic; A Iglic; V Kralj-Iglic; F Srakar; V Antolic
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement.

Authors:  B Jaramaz; A M DiGioia; M Blackwell; C Nikou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quantifying the contribution of pincer deformity to femoro-acetabular impingement using 3D computerised tomography.

Authors:  Wael Dandachli; Ali Najefi; Farhad Iranpour; Jonathan Lenihan; Alister Hart; Justin Cobb
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Cams and pincer impingement are distinct, not mixed: the acetabular pathomorphology of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Justin Cobb; Kartik Logishetty; Kinner Davda; Farhad Iranpour
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Does standing affect acetabular component inclination and version after THA?

Authors:  Gregory G Polkowski; Ryan M Nunley; Erin L Ruh; Brandon M Williams; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Revision of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty in a tertiary center: a prospective study of 39 hips with between 1 and 4 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Alexander D Liddle; Keshtra Satchithananda; Johann Henckel; Shiraz A Sabah; Karuniyan V Vipulendran; Angus Lewis; John A Skinner; Adam W M Mitchell; Alister J Hart
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Is the Iliac Wing Curved Inward in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip?

Authors:  Noriaki Sako; Nobuhiro Kaku; Hiroaki Tagomori; Hiroshi Tsumura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-11-15

6.  Relations between the Crowe classification and the 3D femoral head displacement in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Rongshan Cheng; Henghui Zhang; Willem Alexander Kernkamp; Jingmao Zheng; Kerong Dai; Yifei Yao; Liao Wang; Tsung-Yuan Tsai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.