Literature DB >> 23703532

Restoration of the hip center during THA performed for protrusio acetabuli is associated with better implant survival.

Yaser M K Baghdadi1, A Noelle Larson, Rafael J Sierra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acetabular protrusio is an uncommon finding in hip arthritis. Several reconstructive approaches have been used; however the best approach remains undefined. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Our purposes in this study were to (1) describe the THA survivorship for protrusio as a function of the acetabular component, (2) evaluate survivorship of the cup as a function of restoration of radiographic hip mechanics and offset, and (3) report the long-term clinical results.
METHODS: One hundred twenty-seven patients (162 hips) undergoing primary THA with acetabular protrusio were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 66±13 years, and the mean followup was 10±6 years (range, 2-25 years).The cup fixation was uncemented in 107 (83 with bone graft) and cemented in 55 hips (14 with bone graft). Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were reviewed for restoration of hip mechanics and offset.
RESULTS: The THA survival from aseptic cup revision at 15 years was 89% (95% CI, 75%-96%) for uncemented compared with 85% (95% CI, 68%-94%) for cemented cups. The risk of aseptic cup revision significantly increased by 24% (hazards ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.02-1.5) for every 1 mm medial or lateral distance away from the native hip center of rotation to the prosthetic head center. Harris hip scores were improved by mean of 27±20 points (n=123) with a higher postoperative score for uncemented bone grafted compared with solely cemented cups (81±16 versus 71±20 points).
CONCLUSIONS: Restoring hip center of rotation using an uncemented cup with or without bone graft was associated with increased durability in our series. There was a 24% increase in the risk of aseptic cup revision for every 1 mm medial or lateral distance away from the native hip center to the prosthetic head center. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23703532      PMCID: PMC3773116          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3072-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  22 in total

1.  Impacted morsellized bone grafting and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty for acetabular protrusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an 8- to 18-year follow-up study of 36 hips.

Authors:  W W Rosenberg; B W Schreurs; M C de Waal Malefijt; R P Veth; T J Slooff
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-04

2.  Comparison of preoperative radiographs and intraoperative findings of fixation of hemispheric porous-coated sockets.

Authors:  P Udomkiat; Z Wan; L D Dorr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Intrapelvic protrusion of the acetabulum (Otto pelvis). 1932.

Authors:  Maurice M Pomeranz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Cementless cup supporter for protrusio acetabuli in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  H Matsuno; T Yasuda; K Yudoh; T Yonezawa; F Nakazawa; T Murata; T Kimura
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  E Winter; M Piert; R Volkmann; F Maurer; C Eingartner; K Weise; S Weller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The results of Charnley arthroplasty of hip performed for protrusio acetabuli.

Authors:  A Sotelo-Garza; J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  C S Ranawat; L D Dorr; A E Inglis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The adult hip: an anatomic study. Part II: the soft-tissue landmarks.

Authors:  J Guerra; T G Armbuster; D Resnick; T G Goergen; M L Feingold; G Niwayama; L A Danzig
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  The adult hip: an anatomic study. Part I: the bony landmarks.

Authors:  T G Armbuster; J Guerra; D Resnick; T G Goergen; M L Feingold; G Niwayama; L A Danzig
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  13 in total

1.  What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Philipp von Roth; Matthew T Jennings; Arlen D Hanssen; Mark W Pagnano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Acetabuloplasty with bone grafting in uncemented hip replacement for protrusion.

Authors:  Sándor-György Zuh; Ancuţa Zazgyva; István Gergely; Tudor Sorin Pop
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Long-term results of the uncemented acetabular component in a primary total hip arthroplasty performed for protrusio acetabuli: a fifteen year median follow-up.

Authors:  Yaser M K Baghdadi; A Noelle Larson; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Is Restoration of Hip Center Mandatory for Total Hip Arthroplasty of Protrusio Acetabuli?

Authors:  Beom Seok Lee; Hong Seok Kim; O Sang Kwon; Young-Kyun Lee; Yong-Chan Ha; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2022-06-07

5.  Partial resection of the posterior wall for hip dislocation in severe acetabular protrusio: a useful surgical option.

Authors:  Hugo A Rodriguez; Felipe Viña; Meilyn A Muskus
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2020-11-02

6.  Changes of center of rotation and femoral offset in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jon A Bjarnason; Olav Reikeras
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-12

7.  What do we get from navigation in primary THA?

Authors:  Lisa Renner; Viktor Janz; Carsten Perka; Georgi I Wassilew
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13

8.  Is it Important to Know Where to Place the Spherical Marker for Hip Replacement Digital Planning?

Authors:  Giancarlo Cavalli Polesello; Thiago Tronco Salerno; João Hélio Zucarelli Rezende; Marcelo Cavalheiro de Queiroz; Nayra Deise Rabelo; Walter Ricioli Junior
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-11-07

9.  Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Acetabular Protrusio.

Authors:  Danielle Greig; Peter P Hsiue; Clark J Chen; Rishi Trikha; Amir Khoshbin; Alexandra I Stavrakis
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-07

Review 10.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium.

Authors:  Peter K Sculco; Timothy Wright; Michael-Alexander Malahias; Alexander Gu; Mathias Bostrom; Fares Haddad; Seth Jerabek; Michael Bolognesi; Thomas Fehring; Alejandro Gonzalez DellaValle; William Jiranek; William Walter; Wayne Paprosky; Donald Garbuz; Thomas Sculco
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.