Literature DB >> 33419485

Relationship between corneal biomechanical parameters and corneal sublayer thickness measured by Corvis ST and UHR-OCT in keratoconus and normal eyes.

Yong Li1,2, Zhiqiang Xu1,2, Qiaoli Liu1,2, Yuzhou Wang1,2, Kan Lin1,2, Jiahui Xia1,2, Shihao Chen3,4, Liang Hu5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To explore the relationship between corneal biomechanical parameters and corneal sublayer thickness using corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST) and ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography (UHR-OCT) in clinical and suspected keratoconus and normal eyes.
METHODS: Cross-sectional prospective study. A total of 94 eyes of 70 participants were recruited. Twenty five eyes of 19 keratoconus patients, 52 eyes of 34 patients showing high risk of developing keratoconus according to the Belin/Ambrosio Enhanced Ectasia Display, and each eye of 17 normal subjects were enrolled. All participants underwent Corvis ST, Pentacam, and UHR-OCT examinations at the same time. Stiffness parameter A1 (SP-A1), deformation amplitude ratio (DA ratio), and other biomechanical parameters were recorded using Corvis ST. The vertical and horizontal thickness profiles of central 3 mm corneal epithelium, Bowman's layer, and stroma as measured by the perpendicular distance between the neighboring interfaces were generated using UHR-OCT. The flat keratometry and steep keratometry were obtained using Pentacam. Analysis of correlation was applied to explore the association between variables.
RESULTS: Most of the biomechanical parameters and corneal sublayer thickness profiles showed statistical differences among three groups. A statistically significant linear relationship was noted between SP-A1 and DA ratio in all three groups. SP-A1 was found to be positively correlated with epithelial and Bowman's layer thickness in the keratoconus (KC) group, and with stromal thickness in all three groups. In the normal and suspected keratoconus (SKC) groups, only stromal thickness was included in the stepwise linear regression to predict SP-A1, whereas in the KC group, steep keratometry and Bowman's layer thickness were included.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant and different correlations were noted between corneal stiffness and corneal sublayer thickness in different groups, indicating that corneal sublayers may play different roles in maintaining corneal biomechanical stability between keratoconus and normal eyes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Corneal thickness; Corvis ST; Keratoconus; UHR-OCT

Year:  2021        PMID: 33419485     DOI: 10.1186/s40662-020-00225-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)        ISSN: 2326-0254


  37 in total

1.  Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus.

Authors:  Renato Ambrósio; Ruiz Simonato Alonso; Allan Luz; Luis Guillermo Coca Velarde
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Corneal epithelial thickness profile in the diagnosis of keratoconus.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Air-pulse corneal applanation signal curve parameters for the characterisation of keratoconus.

Authors:  Marek Mikielewicz; Konstantin Kotliar; Rafael I Barraquer; Ralph Michael
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Introduction of Two Novel Stiffness Parameters and Interpretation of Air Puff-Induced Biomechanical Deformation Parameters With a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer.

Authors:  Cynthia J Roberts; Ashraf M Mahmoud; Jeffrey P Bons; Arif Hossain; Ahmed Elsheikh; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Paolo Vinciguerra; Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Corneal biomechanics - a review.

Authors:  Sabine Kling; Farhad Hafezi
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  Applications of corneal topography and tomography: a review.

Authors:  Rachel Fan; Tommy Cy Chan; Gaurav Prakash; Vishal Jhanji
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 7.  [Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer (Corvis ST) for measurement of corneal biomechanical parameters : A praxis-related overview].

Authors:  R Herber; N Terai; K R Pillunat; F Raiskup; L E Pillunat; E Spörl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Correlation Between Corneal Biomechanical Indices and the Severity of Keratoconus.

Authors:  Shizuka Koh; Ryota Inoue; Renato Ambrósio; Naoyuki Maeda; Atsuya Miki; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Biomechanical Characterization of Subclinical Keratoconus Without Topographic or Tomographic Abnormalities.

Authors:  Riccardo Vinciguerra; Renato Ambrósio; Cynthia J Roberts; Claudio Azzolini; Paolo Vinciguerra
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Improved keratoconus detection by ocular response analyzer testing after consideration of corneal thickness as a confounding factor.

Authors:  Jeremías Gastón Galletti; Tomás Pförtner; Fernando Fuentes Bonthoux
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Advances in OCT Imaging in Myopia and Pathologic Myopia.

Authors:  Yong Li; Feihui Zheng; Li Lian Foo; Qiu Ying Wong; Daniel Ting; Quan V Hoang; Rachel Chong; Marcus Ang; Chee Wai Wong
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08

2.  Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Small-Incision Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Intracorneal Concave Lenticule Implantation in Patients with Keratoconus.

Authors:  Qi Wei; Hui Ding; Ke Nie; He Jin; Tan Zhong; Hanyang Yu; Zhenduo Yang; Shisi Hu; Linyi He; Xingwu Zhong
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Accurate In Vivo Bowman's Thickness Measurement Using Mirau Ultrahigh Axial Resolution Line Field Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Samuel Lawman; Sharon Mason; Stephen B Kaye; Yao-Chun Shen; Yalin Zheng
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.048

4.  Visual Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in Thin Corneas.

Authors:  Erika Eskina; Olga Klokova; Roman Damashauskas; Karine Davtyan; Bojan Pajic; Marina Movsesian
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.