Literature DB >> 3341494

A comparison of women in and out of a prematurity prevention project in a North Carolina perinatal care region.

P A Buescher1, P J Meis, J M Ernest, M L Moore, R Michielutte, P Sharp.   

Abstract

We assessed a prematurity prevention project in a North Carolina region with 21,000 annual births in terms of its impact on low birthweight. Project records were matched to birth certificates in order to compare characteristics of women in and out of the program who received prenatal care from private providers. A logistic regression analysis, in which the effects of race, marital status, age, and other risk factors for low birthweight were statistically controlled, showed that women not in the project were 1.32 times (95% Confidence Interval 1.14, 1.54) as likely as project participants to have a birth under 2500 grams. The relative risk for non-participants for a birth under 1500 grams was 1.87 (95% CI 1.25, 2.80). Strengths and limitations of the study are discussed. The results are consistent with previous work examining the etiologies of low birthweight in private versus public patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3341494      PMCID: PMC1349173          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.78.3.264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  9 in total

1.  Prevention of preterm births: a perinatal study in Haguenau, France.

Authors:  E Papiernik; J Bouyer; J Dreyfus; D Collin; G Winisdorffer; S Guegen; M Lecomte; P Lazar
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  The very low-birth-weight rate: Principal predictor of neonatal mortality in industrialized populations.

Authors:  K S Lee; N Paneth; L M Gartner; M Pearlman
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  The quality and completeness of birthweight and gestational age data in computerized birth files.

Authors:  R J David
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The impact of low birth weight on North Carolina neonatal mortality 1976-1982.

Authors:  P A Buescher; R R Nugent; R H Levine
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  1984-07

5.  Regional program for prevention of premature birth in northwestern North Carolina.

Authors:  P J Meis; J M Ernest; M L Moore; R Michielutte; P C Sharp; P A Buescher
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Evaluation of a preterm birth prevention program: preliminary report.

Authors:  M A Herron; M Katz; R K Creasy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Can preterm deliveries be prevented?

Authors:  D M Main; S G Gabbe; D Richardson; S Strong
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity.

Authors:  M C McCormick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Causes of low birth weight births in public and private patients.

Authors:  P J Meis; J M Ernest; M L Moore
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 8.661

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  Prenatal care and prevention of preterm birth. A case-control study in southern Spain.

Authors:  M Gómez-Olmedo; M Delgado-Rodriguez; A Bueno-Cavanillas; J A Molina-Font; R Gálvez-Vargas
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 2.  Community-based, population-focused preterm birth prevention programs - a review.

Authors:  Dana Vitner; Jon Barrett; Wendy Katherine; Scott W White; John P Newnham
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Community-based perinatal care for disadvantaged adolescents: evaluation of The Resource Mothers Program.

Authors:  G Julnes; M Konefal; W Pindur; P Kim
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1994-02

Review 4.  Conceptualizations, measurement, and effects of prenatal maternal stress on birth outcomes.

Authors:  M Lobel
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-06

5.  Comparing mothers' reports on the content of prenatal care received with recommended national guidelines for care.

Authors:  M D Kogan; G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck; D A Nagey; B W Jack
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  A comparison of low birth weight among Medicaid patients of public health departments and other providers of prenatal care in North Carolina and Kentucky.

Authors:  P A Buescher; N I Ward
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 7.  The cost effectiveness of prenatal care.

Authors:  J W Henderson
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1994
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.