Literature DB >> 1738809

A comparison of low birth weight among Medicaid patients of public health departments and other providers of prenatal care in North Carolina and Kentucky.

P A Buescher1, N I Ward.   

Abstract

Matching of Medicaid and health department patients' files to birth certificates was used as a means of evaluating the effect of prenatal care given by public health departments on the birth weights of babies of women in Medicaid. Three years of live birth data from North Carolina and 2 years of birth data from Kentucky were used in the analysis. After controlling for other low birth weight risk factors (including the quantity of prenatal care) with logistic regression, women in Medicaid who received prenatal care outside public health departments were found to be substantially more likely than those who received care at health departments to have low weight infants. This association was especially strong for births under 1,500 grams. The authors suggest that the comprehensive prenatal care that is provided by the public health departments, which includes various nonmedical support services, may be responsible for this difference. These findings have important implications for proposed expansions of the Medicaid Program to cover more pregnant women in poverty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1738809      PMCID: PMC1403601     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  11 in total

1.  A needs assessment in continuing professional education.

Authors:  C B Henretta; M G McClellan; D B Swanson
Journal:  Mobius       Date:  1984-04

2.  A comparison of women in and out of a prematurity prevention project in a North Carolina perinatal care region.

Authors:  P A Buescher; P J Meis; J M Ernest; M L Moore; R Michielutte; P Sharp
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Prevention of preterm births: a perinatal study in Haguenau, France.

Authors:  E Papiernik; J Bouyer; J Dreyfus; D Collin; G Winisdorffer; S Guegen; M Lecomte; P Lazar
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Decline in neonatal mortality, 1968 to 1977: better babies or better care?

Authors:  R J David; E Siegel
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Neonatal deaths in Alabama, 1970-1980: an analysis of birth weight- and race-specific neonatal mortality rates.

Authors:  R L Goldenberg; J L Humphrey; C B Hale; B W Boyd; J B Wayne
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-03-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Identifying the sources of the recent decline in perinatal mortality rates in California.

Authors:  R L Williams; P M Chen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-01-28       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Source of prenatal care and infant birth weight: the case of a North Carolina county.

Authors:  P A Buescher; C Smith; J L Holliday; R H Levine
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Evaluation of a preterm birth prevention program: preliminary report.

Authors:  M A Herron; M Katz; R K Creasy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Risk, antepartum care, and outcome: impact of a maternity and infant care project.

Authors:  R J Sokol; R B Woolf; M G Rosen; K Weingarden
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Can preterm deliveries be prevented?

Authors:  D M Main; S G Gabbe; D Richardson; S Strong
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  16 in total

1.  The relationship between prenatal health behavior advice and low birth weight.

Authors:  M R Sable; A A Herman
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  What Assures Good Outcomes in Medicaid-Financed Prenatal Care?

Authors:  Kay A Johnson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Extent of documented adherence to recommended prenatal care content: provider site differences and effect on outcomes among low-income women.

Authors:  Arden Handler; Kristin Rankin; Deborah Rosenberg; Karabi Sinha
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-02

4.  Obstetric care and payment source: do low-risk Medicaid women get less care?

Authors:  S Dobie; L G Hart; M Fordyce; C H Andrilla; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Outcomes of enhanced prenatal services for Medicaid-eligible women in public and private settings.

Authors:  L Simpson; C Korenbrot; J Greene
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 6.  Medicaid and preterm birth and low birth weight: the last two decades.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Anum; Sheldon M Retchin; Jerome F Strauss
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Black/white differences in prenatal care utilization: an assessment of predisposing and enabling factors.

Authors:  T A LaVeist; V M Keith; M L Gutierrez
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Ethnic disparity in the performance of prenatal nutrition risk assessment among Medicaid-eligible women.

Authors:  E Fuentes-Afflick; C C Korenbrot; J Greene
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Fetal weight normograms for singleton pregnancies in a Jordanian population.

Authors:  Nahla Subhi Al-Bayyari; Adel Taha Abu-Heija
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.526

10.  Comparing mothers' reports on the content of prenatal care received with recommended national guidelines for care.

Authors:  M D Kogan; G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck; D A Nagey; B W Jack
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.