Literature DB >> 3631156

Regional program for prevention of premature birth in northwestern North Carolina.

P J Meis, J M Ernest, M L Moore, R Michielutte, P C Sharp, P A Buescher.   

Abstract

We present our experience with introducing and implementing a prematurity prevention program in a 20-county region in northwest North Carolina. The program is based on the risk assessment and educational model. In the first 25 months of results available, 17,370 births occurred in women enrolled in the project. During 1985, 42.5% of all births in the region occurred in the project. During the time span examined, a downward trend was seen for rates of low birth weight births in public and private patients and for very low birth weight births in private patients. During 1985, private births in the project were significantly less likely to be low birth weight or very low birth weight than private births to women not in the project. These results suggest that regional implementation of prematurity prevention programs is feasible and that such programs are particularly appropriate for private patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3631156     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80005-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of a community-wide preterm birth prevention program.

Authors:  H M Scott; K O O'Connor; P A Carr
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

2.  A preterm birth prevention project in Nova Scotia, Canada.

Authors:  B A Armson; L Dodds; C Cervin; S Christie-Haliburton; K Rinaldo
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2001-09

Review 3.  Community-based, population-focused preterm birth prevention programs - a review.

Authors:  Dana Vitner; Jon Barrett; Wendy Katherine; Scott W White; John P Newnham
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  A comparison of women in and out of a prematurity prevention project in a North Carolina perinatal care region.

Authors:  P A Buescher; P J Meis; J M Ernest; M L Moore; R Michielutte; P Sharp
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  The need for a community-wide approach to promote healthy babies and prevent low birth weight.

Authors:  P J Stewart; C Nimrod
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  The influence of site of care on the content of prenatal care for low-income women.

Authors:  M Kotelchuck; M D Kogan; G R Alexander; B W Jack
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1997-03

7.  Community education on preterm birth. Does it change practice?

Authors:  Ann Sprague; Paula Stewart; Patricia Niday; Carl Nimrod; Robin Walker
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of a community-based enriched model prenatal intervention project in the District of Columbia.

Authors:  A A Herman; H W Berendes; K F Yu; L C Cooper; M D Overpeck; G Rhoads; J P Maxwell; B A Kinney; P A Koslowe; D L Coates
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Preventing preterm birth: are we making any progress?

Authors:  M S Kramer
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1997 May-Jun

Review 10.  An integrated systems biology approach to the study of preterm birth using "-omic" technology--a guideline for research.

Authors:  Sara Gracie; Craig Pennell; Gunvor Ekman-Ordeberg; Stephen Lye; James McManaman; Scott Williams; Lyle Palmer; Maureen Kelley; Ram Menon; Michael Gravett
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.007

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.