Literature DB >> 7431165

The very low-birth-weight rate: Principal predictor of neonatal mortality in industrialized populations.

K S Lee, N Paneth, L M Gartner, M Pearlman.   

Abstract

We have examined the relationship between the rate of very low-birth-weight deliveries in a population and the neonatal mortality of that population on three ecologic levels: in one hospital over a 12-year span; among the 50 states and the District of Columbia; and among 13 industrialized nations. In each of the three sets of populations the VLBW rate is an excellent predictor of neonatal mortality, accounting for about three-quarters of the variance in the outcome in all of the populations studied. The relatively high neonatal mortality of the United States as compared to that in some other industrialized nations is primarily attributable to its disadvantageous birth-weight distribution. Holding the adverse birth-weight distribution constant, the United States appears to do better than most of these nations in neonatal mortality. The weight distribution of live births in any population is closely linked to indices of social class. Survival of infants at a given birth weight, however, might well be a function of perinatal care. Since weight-specific mortality rates for populations are not widely available, examination of the variance in neonatal mortality rates once the VLBW rate is held constant might be a first step in comparing the quality of medical care for newborn infants among different populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Biology; Birth Weight; Body Weight; Child Mortality; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Differential Mortality; Fetal Death; Infant Mortality; Mortality; Neonatal Mortality; North America; Northern America; Physiology; Population; Population Dynamics; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7431165     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(80)80259-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  25 in total

1.  Effect of nonviable infants on the infant mortality rate in Philadelphia, 1992.

Authors:  E Gibson; J Culhane; T Saunders; D Webb; J Greenspan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Methodological challenges in the study of fetal growth.

Authors:  T D Abell
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1994-03

3.  Perinatal mortality and its relationship to the reporting of low-birthweight infants.

Authors:  S T Phelan; R Goldenberg; G Alexander; S P Cliver
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Comparison of mortality risk: a score for very low birthweight infants.

Authors:  R F Maier; M Rey; B C Metze; M Obladen
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Effectiveness of neonatal transport in New York City in neonates less than 2500 grams--a population study.

Authors:  A Ferrara; M Schwartz; H Page; M Israel; Y Atakent; C E Smith; L Landovitz
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1988

6.  Defining quality of care indicators for neonatal intensive care units independent of maternal risk factors.

Authors:  I Ekelem; H W Taeusch
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Ethnic group differences in low birthweight of live singletons in Singapore, 1981-3.

Authors:  K Hughes; N R Tan; K C Lun
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Recent trends in the incidence of multiple births and associated mortality.

Authors:  B J Botting; I M Davies; A J Macfarlane
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Low birth weight,very low birth weight rates and gestational age-specific birth weight distribution of korean newborn infants.

Authors:  Son-Moon Shin; Young-Pyo Chang; Eun-Sil Lee; Young-Ah Lee; Dong-Woo Son; Min-Hee Kim; Young-Ryoon Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  International infant mortality rates: bias from reporting differences.

Authors:  E M Howell; B Blondel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.