Literature DB >> 7938384

Comparing mothers' reports on the content of prenatal care received with recommended national guidelines for care.

M D Kogan1, G R Alexander, M Kotelchuck, D A Nagey, B W Jack.   

Abstract

The Public Health Service's Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care Report in 1989 provided detailed guidelines for the components of each prenatal visit. However, the extent to which women were receiving the recommended care when the guidelines were being formulated has yet to be determined. The 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey results permit an examination of the proportion of women who reported receiving some of the recommended procedures. Women were asked if they received six of the recommended procedures (blood pressure measurement, urine test, blood test, weight and height taken, pelvic examination, and pregnancy history) in the first two visits, and whether they received seven types of advice or counseling (nutrition; vitamin use; smoking, alcohol, and drug use cessation; breastfeeding; and maternal weight gain) any time during their pregnancy. Only 56 percent of the respondents said they received all of the recommended procedures in the first two visits, and only 32 percent of the respondents said they received advice in all of the areas. Logistic regression analysis indicated that women receiving their care from private offices were significantly less likely to receive all the procedures and advice than women at publicly funded sites of care. This study suggests that recommendations of the Public Health Service's expert panel were not being met.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7938384      PMCID: PMC1403551     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  18 in total

1.  Obstetric and perinatal events: the accuracy of maternal report.

Authors:  R Casey; M Rieckhoff; S A Beebe; J Pinto-Martin
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.168

2.  Randomized trial of comprehensive prenatal care for low-income women: effect on infant birth weight.

Authors:  F J McLaughlin; W A Altemeier; M J Christensen; K B Sherrod; M S Dietrich; D T Stern
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Factors associated with birthweight: an exploration of the roles of prenatal care and length of gestation.

Authors:  J A Showstack; P P Budetti; D Minkler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Medical advice on maternal weight gain and actual weight gain. Results from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey.

Authors:  S M Taffel; K G Keppel; G K Jones
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Racial disparities in reported prenatal care advice from health care providers.

Authors:  M D Kogan; M Kotelchuck; G R Alexander; W E Johnson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Are there differences in information given to private and public prenatal patients?

Authors:  M C Freda; H F Andersen; K Damus; I R Merkatz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Prenatal programs: what the literature reveals.

Authors:  A Fink; E M Yano; D Goya
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  A comparison of low birth weight among Medicaid patients of public health departments and other providers of prenatal care in North Carolina and Kentucky.

Authors:  P A Buescher; N I Ward
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Measuring the impact of programs for mothers and infants on prenatal care and low birth weight: the value of refined analyses.

Authors:  M D Peoples; E Siegel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Prenatal care: a path (not taken) to improved perinatal outcome.

Authors:  M L Poland; J W Ager; R J Sokol
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.901

View more
  24 in total

1.  The role of medical problems and behavioral risks in explaining patterns of prenatal care use among high-risk women.

Authors:  L L Clarke; M K Miller; S L Albrecht; B Frentzen; A Cruz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Prenatal care--necessary but not sufficient.

Authors:  M C McCormick
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Practice guidelines and measurement: state-of-the-science.

Authors:  Patricia C Dykes
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  The relationship between prenatal health behavior advice and low birth weight.

Authors:  M R Sable; A A Herman
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  How good is the quality of health care in the United States? 1998.

Authors:  Mark A Schuster; Elizabeth A McGlynn; Robert H Brook
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Antenatal care adequacy in three provinces of Vietnam: Long An, Ben Tre, and Quang Ngai.

Authors:  Lieu Thi Thuy Trinh; Dibley Michael John; Julie Byles
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Characteristics of breastfeeding discussions at the initial prenatal visit.

Authors:  Jill R Demirci; Debra L Bogen; Cynthia Holland; Jill A Tarr; Doris Rubio; Jie Li; Marianne Nemecek; Judy C Chang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Racial/ethnic disparities in the receipt of smoking cessation interventions during prenatal care.

Authors:  Sarah-Truclinh T Tran; Kenneth D Rosenberg; Nichole E Carlson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2010-11

9.  Extent of documented adherence to recommended prenatal care content: provider site differences and effect on outcomes among low-income women.

Authors:  Arden Handler; Kristin Rankin; Deborah Rosenberg; Karabi Sinha
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-02

10.  Detection of alcohol use in the second trimester among low-income pregnant women in the prenatal care settings in Jefferson County, Alabama.

Authors:  Qing Li; Janet Hankin; Sharon C Wilsnack; Ernest L Abel; Russell S Kirby; Louis G Keith; Sarah G Obican
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.