Literature DB >> 8817176

Prenatal care and prevention of preterm birth. A case-control study in southern Spain.

M Gómez-Olmedo1, M Delgado-Rodriguez, A Bueno-Cavanillas, J A Molina-Font, R Gálvez-Vargas.   

Abstract

The value of prenatal care is controversial and difficult to establish. A national policy for improving perinatal outcomes was proposed and applied throughout Andalusia (Southern Spain) in 1984. Here we report the results of an evaluation of this health care program as regards the prevention of preterm delivery. Effectiveness of prenatal care was assessed on the basis of two case-control studies in a hospital setting: one performed before the program was implemented (1981-1982) and the second one six years after the program began (1990-1993). A total of 229 cases and 395 controls for the period 1981-1982, and 207 cases and 381 controls for 1990-1993 were selected. Prenatal care was assessed based on the number of prenatal care visits, the date of the first visit, and an American composite index adjusting for gestational age. Multiple-factor adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression analysis. The use of prenatal care significantly improved across time: the proportion of women receiving no prenatal care decreased from over 30% to less than 5%, and the proportion of women starting prenatal care in the first trimester for 1990-1993 was three times greater than the figure for 1981-1982. In the 1981-1982 case-control study, the date of first visit and the composite index were shown to be unrelated to preterm birth risk; and the number of visits yielded a significant association, although no definite trend could be established. In the 1990-1993 case-control study, a clear and significant relationship was observed between the number of prenatal care visits, the trimester of the first visit, and the adequacy of care according to the composite index. This latter variable, reflecting a more stringent standard of prenatal care, was selected by a stepwise logistic regression analysis as the best predictor for preterm birth risk. The results suggest that the present Andalusian program helps prevent preterm delivery. Nonetheless, its minimum standards should be raised to further decrease preterm birth risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8817176     DOI: 10.1007/bf00144426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  33 in total

1.  A cohort study of the impact of perinatal drug use on prematurity in an inner-city population.

Authors:  J G Feldman; H L Minkoff; S McCalla; M Salwen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Source of bias in prenatal care utilization indices: implications for evaluating the Medicaid expansion.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M E Tompkins; D J Petersen; J Weiss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Prenatal care evaluation and cohort analyses.

Authors:  J Tyson; D Guzick; C R Rosenfeld; R Lasky; N Gant; J Jiminez; S Heartwell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Sociodemographic factors and the quality of prenatal care.

Authors:  M J Hansell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Prenatal care utilization: its measurement and relationship to pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  G R Alexander; D A Cornely
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  A life table analysis of the relation of prenatal care to prematurity.

Authors:  M Terris; M Glasser
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M S Kramer
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.408

8.  A comparison of women in and out of a prematurity prevention project in a North Carolina perinatal care region.

Authors:  P A Buescher; P J Meis; J M Ernest; M L Moore; R Michielutte; P Sharp
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The West Los Angeles Preterm Birth Prevention Project. I. Program impact on high-risk women.

Authors:  C J Hobel; M G Ross; R L Bemis; J R Bragonier; S Nessim; M Sandhu; M B Bear; B Mori
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Prospective evaluation of a risk scoring system for predicting preterm delivery in black inner city women.

Authors:  D M Main; D Richardson; S G Gabbe; S Strong; S C Weller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  1 in total

1.  Inadequate prenatal care and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a comparison of indices.

Authors:  Maureen I Heaman; Christine V Newburn-Cook; Chris G Green; Lawrence J Elliott; Michael E Helewa
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 3.007

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.