Literature DB >> 33402076

Hearing sensitivity and amplitude coding in bats are differentially shaped by echolocation calls and social calls.

Ella Z Lattenkamp1,2, Martina Nagy3, Markus Drexl4, Sonja C Vernes2,5, Lutz Wiegrebe1, Mirjam Knörnschild3,6,7.   

Abstract

Differences in auditory perception between species are influenced by phylogenetic origin and the perceptual challenges imposed by the natural environment, such as detecting prey- or predator-generated sounds and communication signals. Bats are well suited for comparative studies on auditory perception since they predominantly rely on echolocation to perceive the world, while their social calls and most environmental sounds have low frequencies. We tested if hearing sensitivity and stimulus level coding in bats differ between high and low-frequency ranges by measuring auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) of 86 bats belonging to 11 species. In most species, auditory sensitivity was equally good at both high- and low-frequency ranges, while amplitude was more finely coded for higher frequency ranges. Additionally, we conducted a phylogenetic comparative analysis by combining our ABR data with published data on 27 species. Species-specific peaks in hearing sensitivity correlated with peak frequencies of echolocation calls and pup isolation calls, suggesting that changes in hearing sensitivity evolved in response to frequency changes of echolocation and social calls. Overall, our study provides the most comprehensive comparative assessment of bat hearing capacities to date and highlights the evolutionary pressures acting on their sensory perception.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amplitude coding; audiogram; auditory brainstem responses; dynamic range; hearing threshold; sensory system evolution

Year:  2021        PMID: 33402076      PMCID: PMC7892409          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  35 in total

Review 1.  The communicative potential of bat echolocation pulses.

Authors:  Gareth Jones; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Estimating loudness growth from tone-burst evoked responses.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Objective detection of evoked potentials using a bootstrap technique.

Authors:  Jing Lv; David M Simpson; Steven L Bell
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 4.  The evolution of echolocation in bats.

Authors:  Gareth Jones; Emma C Teeling
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Social evolution in toothed whales.

Authors:  R C Connor; J Mann; P L Tyack; H Whitehead
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  The auditory brain stem response in five vertebrate classes.

Authors:  J T Corwin; T H Bullock; J Schweitzer
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-12

7.  Ontogeny of auditory brainstem responses in the bat, Phyllostomus discolor.

Authors:  Meike Linnenschmidt; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Scaling of echolocation call parameters in bats.

Authors:  G Jones
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Hearing and hunting in red bats (Lasiurus borealis, Vespertilionidae): audiogram and ear properties.

Authors:  M K Obrist; J J Wenstrup
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Echolocation in Oilbirds and swiftlets.

Authors:  Signe Brinkløv; M Brock Fenton; John M Ratcliffe
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 4.566

View more
  5 in total

1.  Bayesian Analyses of Comparative Data with the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Model: Potential Pitfalls.

Authors:  Josselin Cornuault
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 9.160

2.  Non-invasive auditory brainstem responses to FM sweeps in awake big brown bats.

Authors:  Andrea Megela Simmons; Amaro Tuninetti; Brandon M Yeoh; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.389

3.  Hearing sensitivity: An underlying mechanism for niche differentiation in gleaning bats.

Authors:  Inga Geipel; Ella Z Lattenkamp; M May Dixon; Lutz Wiegrebe; Rachel A Page
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Hearing sensitivity and amplitude coding in bats are differentially shaped by echolocation calls and social calls.

Authors:  Ella Z Lattenkamp; Martina Nagy; Markus Drexl; Sonja C Vernes; Lutz Wiegrebe; Mirjam Knörnschild
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Hearing, echolocation, and beam steering from day 0 in tongue-clicking bats.

Authors:  Grace C Smarsh; Yifat Tarnovsky; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 5.349

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.