Literature DB >> 16621656

Objective detection of evoked potentials using a bootstrap technique.

Jing Lv1, David M Simpson, Steven L Bell.   

Abstract

Evoked potentials are usually evaluated subjectively, by visual inspection, and considerable differences between interpretations can occur. Objective, automated methods are normally based on calculating one (or more) parameters from the data, but only some of these techniques can provide statistical significance (p-values) for the presence of a response. In this work, we propose a bootstrap technique to provide such p-values, which can be applied to a wide variety of parameters. The bootstrap method is based on randomly resampling (with replacement) the original data and gives an estimate of the probability that the response obtained is due to random variation in the data rather than a physiological response. The method is illustrated using auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to detecting hearing thresholds. The flexibility of the approach is illustrated, showing how it can be used with different parameters, numbers of stimuli and with user-defined false-positive rates. The bootstrap method provides a new, simple and yet powerful means of detecting evoked potentials, which is very flexible and readily adapted to a wide variety of signal parameters.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16621656     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  18 in total

1.  Bootstrap significance of low SNR evoked response.

Authors:  J McCubbin; T Yee; J Vrba; S E Robinson; P Murphy; H Eswaran; H Preissl
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Statistical test of VEP waveform equality.

Authors:  Rockefeller S L Young; Eiji Kimura
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Assessing recurrent interactions in cortical networks: Modeling EEG response to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Jui-Yang Chang; Matteo Fecchio; Andrea Pigorini; Marcello Massimini; Giulio Tononi; Barry D Van Veen
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Auditory brainstem responses in the bat Carollia perspicillata: threshold calculation and relation to audiograms based on otoacoustic emission measurement.

Authors:  Johannes Wetekam; Christin Reissig; Julio C Hechavarria; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Modeling GABA alterations in schizophrenia: a link between impaired inhibition and altered gamma and beta range auditory entrainment.

Authors:  Dorea Vierling-Claassen; Peter Siekmeier; Steven Stufflebeam; Nancy Kopell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Objective threshold estimation and measurement of the residual background noise in auditory evoked potentials of goldfish.

Authors:  Jianqiang Xiao; Christopher B Braun
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  An objective assessment of fetal and neonatal auditory evoked responses.

Authors:  R B Govindan; J D Wilson; H Preissl; P Murphy; C L Lowery; H Eswaran
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich; Michael B Hoffmann; J Vernon Odom; Daphne L McCulloch; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Hearing sensitivity: An underlying mechanism for niche differentiation in gleaning bats.

Authors:  Inga Geipel; Ella Z Lattenkamp; M May Dixon; Lutz Wiegrebe; Rachel A Page
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Perturbation of resting-state network nodes preferentially propagates to structurally rather than functionally connected regions.

Authors:  Davide Momi; Recep A Ozdemir; Ehsan Tadayon; Pierre Boucher; Alberto Di Domenico; Mirco Fasolo; Mouhsin M Shafi; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Emiliano Santarnecchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.