Literature DB >> 34426521

Hearing sensitivity: An underlying mechanism for niche differentiation in gleaning bats.

Inga Geipel1,2,3, Ella Z Lattenkamp4,5, M May Dixon6,7, Lutz Wiegrebe5, Rachel A Page6.   

Abstract

Tropical ecosystems are known for high species diversity. Adaptations permitting niche differentiation enable species to coexist. Historically, research focused primarily on morphological and behavioral adaptations for foraging, roosting, and other basic ecological factors. Another important factor, however, is differences in sensory capabilities. So far, studies mainly have focused on the output of behavioral strategies of predators and their prey preference. Understanding the coexistence of different foraging strategies, however, requires understanding underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms. In this study, we investigate hearing in bats and how it shapes bat species coexistence. We present the hearing thresholds and echolocation calls of 12 different gleaning bats from the ecologically diverse Phyllostomid family. We measured their auditory brainstem responses to assess their hearing sensitivity. The audiograms of these species had similar overall shapes but differed substantially for frequencies below 9 kHz and in the frequency range of their echolocation calls. Our results suggest that differences among bats in hearing abilities contribute to the diversity in foraging strategies of gleaning bats. We argue that differences in auditory sensitivity could be important mechanisms shaping diversity in sensory niches and coexistence of species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Phyllostomidae; audiograms; auditory brainstem response; echolocation; sensory niche partitioning

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34426521      PMCID: PMC8433509          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2024943118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  44 in total

1.  Correlated evolution between hearing sensitivity and social calls in bats.

Authors:  Kirsten M Bohn; Cynthia F Moss; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Simulated head related transfer function of the phyllostomid bat Phyllostomus discolor.

Authors:  F De Mey; J Reijniers; H Peremans; M Otani; U Firzlaff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Bats Actively Use Leaves as Specular Reflectors to Detect Acoustically Camouflaged Prey.

Authors:  Inga Geipel; Jan Steckel; Marco Tschapka; Dieter Vanderelst; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Herbert Peremans; Ralph Simon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Silent katydid females are at higher risk of bat predation than acoustically signalling katydid males.

Authors:  Hanumanthan Raghuram; Rittik Deb; Diptarup Nandi; Rohini Balakrishnan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  What noseleaves do for FM bats depends on their degree of sensorial specialization.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Fons De Mey; Herbert Peremans; Inga Geipel; Elisabeth Kalko; Uwe Firzlaff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Ganglion-specific splicing of TRPV1 underlies infrared sensation in vampire bats.

Authors:  Elena O Gracheva; Julio F Cordero-Morales; José A González-Carcacía; Nicholas T Ingolia; Carlo Manno; Carla I Aranguren; Jonathan S Weissman; David Julius
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  All you can eat: high performance capacity and plasticity in the common big-eared bat, Micronycteris microtis (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae).

Authors:  Sharlene E Santana; Inga Geipel; Elizabeth R Dumont; Margareta B Kalka; Elisabeth K V Kalko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Driving factors for the evolution of species-specific echolocation call design in new world free-tailed bats (molossidae).

Authors:  Kirsten Jung; Jesús Molinari; Elisabeth K V Kalko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Hearing sensitivity and amplitude coding in bats are differentially shaped by echolocation calls and social calls.

Authors:  Ella Z Lattenkamp; Martina Nagy; Markus Drexl; Sonja C Vernes; Lutz Wiegrebe; Mirjam Knörnschild
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  What ears do for bats: a comparative study of pinna sound pressure transformation in chiroptera.

Authors:  M K Obrist; M B Fenton; J L Eger; P A Schlegel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  3 in total

1.  Ear pinnae in a neotropical katydid (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) function as ultrasound guides for bat detection.

Authors:  Christian A Pulver; Emine Celiker; Charlie Woodrow; Inga Geipel; Carl D Soulsbury; Darron A Cullen; Stephen M Rogers; Daniel Veitch; Fernando Montealegre-Z
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Hearing sensitivity: An underlying mechanism for niche differentiation in gleaning bats.

Authors:  Inga Geipel; Ella Z Lattenkamp; M May Dixon; Lutz Wiegrebe; Rachel A Page
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Dietary analysis reveals differences in the prey use of two sympatric bat species.

Authors:  Olga Heim; Anna I E Puisto; Ilari Sääksjärvi; Dai Fukui; Eero J Vesterinen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.912

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.