Literature DB >> 10562518

Scaling of echolocation call parameters in bats.

G Jones1.   

Abstract

I investigated the scaling of echolocation call parameters (frequency, duration and repetition rate) in bats in a functional context. Low-duty-cycle bats operate with search phase cycles of usually less than 20 %. They process echoes in the time domain and are therefore intolerant of pulse-echo overlap. High-duty-cycle (>30 %) species use Doppler shift compensation, and they separate pulse and echo in the frequency domain. Call frequency scales negatively with body mass in at least five bat families. Pulse duration scales positively with mass in low-duty-cycle quasi-constant-frequency (QCF) species because the large aerial-hawking species that emit these signals fly fast in open habitats. They therefore detect distant targets and experience pulse-echo overlap later than do smaller bats. Pulse duration also scales positively with mass in the Hipposideridae, which show at least partial Doppler shift compensation. Pulse repetition rate corresponds closely with wingbeat frequency in QCF bat species that fly relatively slowly. Larger, fast-flying species often skip pulses when detecting distant targets. There is probably a trade-off between call intensity and repetition rate because 'whispering' bats (and hipposiderids) produce several calls per predicted wingbeat and because batches of calls are emitted per wingbeat during terminal buzzes. Severe atmospheric attenuation at high frequencies limits the range of high-frequency calls. Low-duty-cycle bats that call at high frequencies must therefore use short pulses to avoid pulse-echo overlap. Rhinolophids escape this constraint by Doppler shift compensation and, importantly, can exploit advantages associated with the emission of both high-frequency and long-duration calls. Low frequencies are unsuited for the detection of small prey, and low repetition rates may limit prey detection rates. Echolocation parameters may therefore constrain maximum body size in aerial-hawking bats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10562518     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.202.23.3359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  53 in total

1.  Prestin shows divergent evolution between constant frequency echolocating bats.

Authors:  Bin Shen; Rafael Avila-Flores; Yang Liu; Stephen J Rossiter; Shuyi Zhang
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Convergence of reference frequencies by multiple CF-FM bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon) during paired flights evaluated with onboard microphones.

Authors:  Yuto Furusawa; Shizuko Hiryu; Kohta I Kobayasi; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  The communicative potential of bat echolocation pulses.

Authors:  Gareth Jones; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Neural mechanisms of target ranging in FM bats: physiological evidence from bats and frogs.

Authors:  Albert S Feng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  Sensory acquisition in active sensing systems.

Authors:  M E Nelson; M A MacIver
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Correlated evolution between hearing sensitivity and social calls in bats.

Authors:  Kirsten M Bohn; Cynthia F Moss; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Intra-individual variation in the vocalized frequency of the Taiwanese leaf-nosed bat, Hipposideros terasensis, influenced by conspecific colony members.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Koji Katsura; Tsuyoshi Nagato; Hideo Yamazaki; Liang-Kong Lin; Yoshiaki Watanabe; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  What the bat's voice tells the bat's brain.

Authors:  Nachum Ulanovsky; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Drinking and flying: does alcohol consumption affect the flight and echolocation performance of phyllostomid bats?

Authors:  Dara N Orbach; Nina Veselka; Yvonne Dzal; Louis Lazure; M Brock Fenton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Listening in pheromone plumes: disruption of olfactory-guided mate attraction in a moth by a bat-like ultrasound.

Authors:  Glenn P Svenssona; Christer Löfstedt; Niels Skals
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.