Literature DB >> 6183096

The auditory brain stem response in five vertebrate classes.

J T Corwin, T H Bullock, J Schweitzer.   

Abstract

In representative elasmobranchs, osteichthyans, amphibians, reptiles and birds, average evoked potentials in response to acoustic clicks and tone bursts were recorded intracranially, but outside the brain, or extracranially. Controls against artifacts and tests after transections show that these potentials conform to criteria for auditory brain stem responses (ABRs). Brief waves in a 10-15 msec sequence originate successively in the eighth nerve, medulla and midbrain; there is little contribution to the latter waves from the lower levels. This response pattern appears to be consistent within each species and is similar to that extensively studied in mammals. Some of its features are remarkably alike in all the vertebrate classes tested, implying a generality in the existence of a subset of auditory neurons at several brain levels that are highly synchronous in activity, even after several synapses, and geometrically oriented to add their macroscopic, open, dipole fields. The intensity, repetition rate and the power spectrum of the click stimuli have little effect on the ABR pattern, except when the peak energy is in the low frequency range. In the range below ca. 700 Hz frequency content has a considerable effect; lower frequencies broaden certain waves. Cooling has marked and differential effects on component processes. Reversing click phase, e.g. from initial compression to initial rarefaction, can show no effect or any of several effects, depending on the species. Tone bursts evoke onset ABRs and in some cases after a transitional period a sustained frequency following response. The ABR resembles a click evoked potential even when stimulus rise time is slow. Background tones of particular frequency are most efficient in masking click evoked ABRs; white noise is less efficient. The ABR should be useful in neuroethology since it can be studied without invading the brain. It can tell that the brain is sensitive to a sound. In an immobilized animal it can be recorded in a single sweep, or it can be averaged from an awake tethered animal. It shows good sensitivity and at least some correspondence with behavioral measures of hearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6183096     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(82)90117-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  36 in total

1.  Ultrasonic singing by the blue-throated hummingbird: a comparison between production and perception.

Authors:  Carolyn L Pytte; Millicent S Ficken; Andrew Moiseff
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Specialization for underwater hearing by the tympanic middle ear of the turtle, Trachemys scripta elegans.

Authors:  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Christian Brandt; Katie L Willis; Christian Bech Christensen; Darlene Ketten; Peggy Edds-Walton; Richard R Fay; Peter T Madsen; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Assessing stimulus and subject influences on auditory evoked potentials and their relation to peripheral physiology in green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea).

Authors:  Nathan P Buerkle; Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.320

4.  Keeping returns optimal: gain control exerted through sensitivity adjustments in the harbour porpoise auditory system.

Authors:  Meike Linnenschmidt; Kristian Beedholm; Magnus Wahlberg; Jakob Højer-Kristensen; Paul E Nachtigall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Beaked whale auditory evoked potential hearing measurements.

Authors:  Mandy L H Cook; René A Varela; Juli D Goldstein; Stephen D McCulloch; Gregory D Bossart; James J Finneran; Dorian Houser; David A Mann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Auditory brainstem responses to airborne sounds in the aquatic frog Xenopus laevis: correlation with middle ear characteristics.

Authors:  Bharti Katbamna; John A Brown; Melissa Collard; Charles F Ide
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  A novel hearing specialization in the New Zealand bigeye, Pempheris adspersa.

Authors:  C A Radford; J C Montgomery; P Caiger; P Johnston; J Lu; D M Higgs
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Sensory processing in the pallium of a mormyrid fish.

Authors:  J C Prechtl; G von der Emde; J Wolfart; S Karamürsel; G N Akoev; Y N Andrianov; T H Bullock
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Auditory brainstem responses and auditory thresholds in woodpeckers.

Authors:  Bernard Lohr; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).

Authors:  Ian C Hall; Sarah M N Woolley; Ursula Kwong-Brown; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.