Literature DB >> 32107702

Assessing the accuracy of octanol-water partition coefficient predictions in the SAMPL6 Part II log P Challenge.

Mehtap Işık1,2, Teresa Danielle Bergazin3, Thomas Fox4, Andrea Rizzi5,6, John D Chodera5, David L Mobley3,7.   

Abstract

The SAMPL Challenges aim to focus the biomolecular and physical modeling community on issues that limit the accuracy of predictive modeling of protein-ligand binding for rational drug design. In the SAMPL5 log D Challenge, designed to benchmark the accuracy of methods for predicting drug-like small molecule transfer free energies from aqueous to nonpolar phases, participants found it difficult to make accurate predictions due to the complexity of protonation state issues. In the SAMPL6 log P Challenge, we asked participants to make blind predictions of the octanol-water partition coefficients of neutral species of 11 compounds and assessed how well these methods performed absent the complication of protonation state effects. This challenge builds on the SAMPL6 p[Formula: see text] Challenge, which asked participants to predict p[Formula: see text] values of a superset of the compounds considered in this log P challenge. Blind prediction sets of 91 prediction methods were collected from 27 research groups, spanning a variety of quantum mechanics (QM) or molecular mechanics (MM)-based physical methods, knowledge-based empirical methods, and mixed approaches. There was a 50% increase in the number of participating groups and a 20% increase in the number of submissions compared to the SAMPL5 log D Challenge. Overall, the accuracy of octanol-water log P predictions in SAMPL6 Challenge was higher than cyclohexane-water log D predictions in SAMPL5, likely because modeling only the neutral species was necessary for log P and several categories of method benefited from the vast amounts of experimental octanol-water log P data. There were many highly accurate methods: 10 diverse methods achieved RMSE less than 0.5 log P units. These included QM-based methods, empirical methods, and mixed methods with physical modeling supported with empirical corrections. A comparison of physical modeling methods showed that QM-based methods outperformed MM-based methods. The average RMSE of the most accurate five MM-based, QM-based, empirical, and mixed approach methods based on RMSE were 0.92 ± 0.13, 0.48 ± 0.06, 0.47 ± 0.05, and 0.50 ± 0.06, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blind prediction challenge; Free energy calculations; Octanol–water partition coefficient; SAMPL; Solvation modeling; log P

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32107702      PMCID: PMC7138020          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-020-00295-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  72 in total

1.  Prediction of SAMPL2 aqueous solvation free energies and tautomeric ratios using the SM8, SM8AD, and SMD solvation models.

Authors:  Raphael F Ribeiro; Aleksandr V Marenich; Christopher J Cramer; Donald G Truhlar
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Building Force Fields: An Automatic, Systematic, and Reproducible Approach.

Authors:  Lee-Ping Wang; Todd J Martinez; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 6.475

3.  Charge distribution from a simple molecular orbital type calculation and non-bonding interaction terms in the force field MAB.

Authors:  P R Gerber
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  OpenMM: A Hardware Independent Framework for Molecular Simulations.

Authors:  Peter Eastman; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Comput Sci Eng       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.080

5.  The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting aqueous pKa values from EC-RISM theory.

Authors:  Nicolas Tielker; Lukas Eberlein; Stefan Güssregen; Stefan M Kast
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  A comparison of molecular representations for lipophilicity quantitative structure-property relationships with results from the SAMPL6 logP Prediction Challenge.

Authors:  Raymond Lui; Davy Guan; Slade Matthews
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Predicting octanol/water partition coefficients for the SAMPL6 challenge using the SM12, SM8, and SMD solvation models.

Authors:  Jonathan A Ouimet; Andrew S Paluch
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  SAMPL6 logP challenge: machine learning and quantum mechanical approaches.

Authors:  Prajay Patel; David M Kuntz; Michael R Jones; Bernard R Brooks; Angela K Wilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Identifying ligand binding sites and poses using GPU-accelerated Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Kai Wang; John D Chodera; Yanzhi Yang; Michael R Shirts
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Microscopic structure and solvation in dry and wet octanol.

Authors:  Bin Chen; J Ilja Siepmann
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  20 in total

1.  Octanol-water partition coefficient measurements for the SAMPL6 blind prediction challenge.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Dorothy Levorse; David L Mobley; Timothy Rhodes; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Prediction of the n-octanol/water partition coefficients in the SAMPL6 blind challenge from MST continuum solvation calculations.

Authors:  William J Zamora; Silvana Pinheiro; Kilian German; Clara Ràfols; Carles Curutchet; F Javier Luque
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Comparison of logP and logD correction models trained with public and proprietary data sets.

Authors:  Ignacio Aliagas; Alberto Gobbi; Man-Ling Lee; Benjamin D Sellers
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Predicting octanol/water partition coefficients using molecular simulation for the SAMPL7 challenge: comparing the use of neat and water saturated 1-octanol.

Authors:  Spencer J Sabatino; Andrew S Paluch
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Prediction of octanol-water partition coefficients for the SAMPL6-[Formula: see text] molecules using molecular dynamics simulations with OPLS-AA, AMBER and CHARMM force fields.

Authors:  Shujie Fan; Bogdan I Iorga; Oliver Beckstein
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  SAMPL7 blind challenge: quantum-mechanical prediction of partition coefficients and acid dissociation constants for small drug-like molecules.

Authors:  Basak Koca Fındık; Zeynep Pinar Haslak; Evrim Arslan; Viktorya Aviyente
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Overview of the SAMPL6 pKa challenge: evaluating small molecule microscopic and macroscopic pKa predictions.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Ariën S Rustenburg; Andrea Rizzi; M R Gunner; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  SAMPL7 Host-Guest Challenge Overview: assessing the reliability of polarizable and non-polarizable methods for binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Martin Amezcua; Léa El Khoury; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  An octanol hinge opens the door to water transport.

Authors:  Zhu Liu; Aurora E Clark
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Prediction of n-octanol/water partition coefficients and acidity constants (pKa) in the SAMPL7 blind challenge with the IEFPCM-MST model.

Authors:  Antonio Viayna; Silvana Pinheiro; Carles Curutchet; F Javier Luque; William J Zamora
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.