Literature DB >> 35059940

Application of the alchemical transfer and potential of mean force methods to the SAMPL8 host-guest blinded challenge.

Solmaz Azimi1,2, Joe Z Wu1,3, Sheenam Khuttan1,2, Tom Kurtzman2,3,4, Nanjie Deng5, Emilio Gallicchio6,7,8.   

Abstract

We report the results of our participation in the SAMPL8 GDCC Blind Challenge for host-guest binding affinity predictions. Absolute binding affinity prediction is of central importance to the biophysics of molecular association and pharmaceutical discovery. The blinded SAMPL series have provided an important forum for assessing the reliability of binding free energy methods in an objective way. In this challenge, we employed two binding free energy methods, the newly developed alchemical transfer method (ATM) and the well-established potential of mean force (PMF) physical pathway method, using the same setup and force field model. The calculated binding free energies from the two methods are in excellent quantitative agreement. Importantly, the results from the two methods were also found to agree well with the experimental binding affinities released subsequently, with R values of 0.89 (ATM) and 0.83 (PMF). These results were ranked among the best of the SAMPL8 GDCC challenge and second only to those obtained with the more accurate AMOEBA force field. Interestingly, the two host molecules included in the challenge (TEMOA and TEETOA) displayed distinct binding mechanisms, with TEMOA undergoing a dehydration transition whereas guest binding to TEETOA resulted in the opening of the binding cavity that remains essentially dry during the process. The coupled reorganization and hydration equilibria observed in these systems is a useful prototype for the study of these phenomena often observed in the formation of protein-ligand complexes. Given that the two free energy methods employed here are based on entirely different thermodynamic pathways, the close agreement between the two and their general agreement with the experimental binding free energies are a testament to the high quality and precision achieved by theory and methods. The study provides further validation of the novel ATM binding free energy estimation protocol and paves the way to further extensions of the method to more complex systems.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binding free energy estimation; Computational alchemy; Host-guest; Potential of mean force; SAMPL

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35059940      PMCID: PMC8982563          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-021-00437-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  29 in total

1.  BEDAM binding free energy predictions for the SAMPL4 octa-acid host challenge.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Haoyuan Chen; He Chen; Michael Fitzgerald; Yang Gao; Peng He; Malathi Kalyanikar; Chuan Kao; Beidi Lu; Yijie Niu; Manasi Pethe; Jie Zhu; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Alchemical transformations for concerted hydration free energy estimation with explicit solvation.

Authors:  Sheenam Khuttan; Solmaz Azimi; Joe Z Wu; Emilio Gallicchio
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Protein structure-based drug design: from docking to molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Paweł Śledź; Amedeo Caflisch
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Steven Murkli; John N McNeill; Wei Yao; Matthew Sullivan; Michael K Gilson; Michael W Chiu; Lyle Isaacs; Bruce C Gibb; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Rigorous Free Energy Simulations in Virtual Screening.

Authors:  Zoe Cournia; Bryce K Allen; Thijs Beuming; David A Pearlman; Brian K Radak; Woody Sherman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 6.  Recent theoretical and computational advances for modeling protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.507

7.  Prediction of SAMPL3 host-guest affinities with the binding energy distribution analysis method (BEDAM).

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Free Energy-Based Computational Methods for the Study of Protein-Peptide Binding Equilibria.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 9.  Efficient drug lead discovery and optimization.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 22.384

10.  Comparing alchemical and physical pathway methods for computing the absolute binding free energy of charged ligands.

Authors:  Nanjie Deng; Di Cui; Bin W Zhang; Junchao Xia; Jeffrey Cruz; Ronald Levy
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.676

View more
  1 in total

1.  Developing end-point methods for absolute binding free energy calculation using the Boltzmann-quasiharmonic model.

Authors:  Lauren Wickstrom; Emilio Gallicchio; Lieyang Chen; Tom Kurtzman; Nanjie Deng
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.945

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.