Literature DB >> 33379316

Comparison of Subjective Responses of Low Back Pain Patients and Asymptomatic Controls to Use of Spinal Exoskeleton during Simple Load Lifting Tasks: A Pilot Study.

Žiga Kozinc1,2, Jan Babič3, Nejc Šarabon1,2,4,5.   

Abstract

Spinal exoskeletons have been suggested as an approach for the prevention and rehabilitation of occupational low back pain (LBP). While the state-of-the-art exoskeletons were shown to substantially unload the back, user acceptance is still limited. Perceived discomfort and restriction of freedom of movement are commonly reported. In this pilot study, we explored the differences in subjective responses and user impressions to using passive spinal exoskeleton during a set of simple lifting tasks between LBP patients (n = 12) and asymptomatic individuals (n = 10). Visual analog scales (0-10) were used for all assessments. Overall, the results showed mostly similar responses or slightly more positive responses to the exoskeleton from LBP patients. Most notably, the LBP patients reported a statistically significant (p = 0.048) higher willingness to use the device daily (5.36 ± 4.05) compared to the control group (2.00 ± 1.85) and also gave the device a higher overall grade (6.58 ± 1.98 vs. 4.30 ± 2.26; p = 0.021). This study has demonstrated that individuals with current LBP responded more favorably to the use of the spinal exoskeleton for simple lifting tasks. This implies that current exoskeletons could be appropriate for LBP rehabilitation, but not preventions, as pain-free individuals are less willing to use such devices. Future studies should explore whether different exoskeleton designs could be more appropriate for people with no LBP issues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ergonomics; exosuit; occupation; pain; robotics; wearable robot

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33379316      PMCID: PMC7795241          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  14 in total

1.  Effects of a passive exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low back in static holding tasks.

Authors:  Axel S Koopman; Idsart Kingma; Gert S Faber; Michiel P de Looze; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load.

Authors:  Michiel P de Looze; Tim Bosch; Frank Krause; Konrad S Stadler; Leonard W O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Short-Term Effects of a Passive Spinal Exoskeleton on Functional Performance, Discomfort and User Satisfaction in Patients with Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Žiga Kozinc; Saskia Baltrusch; Han Houdijk; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-03

4.  Reliability of a battery of tests for functional evaluation of trunk exoskeletons.

Authors:  Žiga Kozinc; Saskia Baltrusch; Han Houdijk; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of a new passive back support exoskeleton.

Authors:  Axel S Koopman; Matthias Näf; Saskia J Baltrusch; Idsart Kingma; Carlos Rodriguez-Guerrero; Jan Babič; Michiel P de Looze; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work.

Authors:  Tim Bosch; Jennifer van Eck; Karlijn Knitel; Michiel de Looze
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  Effects of a passive back exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low-back during symmetric lifting.

Authors:  Axel S Koopman; Idsart Kingma; Michiel P de Looze; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  SPEXOR passive spinal exoskeleton decreases metabolic cost during symmetric repetitive lifting.

Authors:  S J Baltrusch; J H van Dieën; A S Koopman; M B Näf; C Rodriguez-Guerrero; J Babič; H Houdijk
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Robotic Technology in Pediatric Neurorehabilitation. A Pilot Study of Human Factors in an Italian Pediatric Hospital.

Authors:  Francesco Gilardi; Federica De Falco; Daniela Casasanta; Martina Andellini; Simone Gazzellini; Maurizio Petrarca; Andreina Morocutti; Donatella Lettori; Matteo Ritrovato; Enrico Castelli; Massimiliano Raponi; Nicola Magnavita; Salvatore Zaffina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Passive Trunk Exoskeleton Acceptability and Effects on Self-efficacy in Employees with Low-Back Pain: A Mixed Method Approach.

Authors:  S J Baltrusch; H Houdijk; J H van Dieën; J Th C M de Kruif
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.