Literature DB >> 32423541

Biomechanical evaluation of a new passive back support exoskeleton.

Axel S Koopman1, Matthias Näf2, Saskia J Baltrusch3, Idsart Kingma4, Carlos Rodriguez-Guerrero2, Jan Babič5, Michiel P de Looze6, Jaap H van Dieën1.   

Abstract

The number one cause of disability in the world is low-back pain, with mechanical loading as one of the major risk factors. To reduce mechanical loading, exoskeletons have been introduced in the workplace. Substantial reductions in back muscle activity were found when using the exoskeleton during static bending and manual materials handling. However, most exoskeletons only have one joint at hip level, resulting in loss of range of motion and shifting of the exoskeleton relative to the body. To address these issues, a new exoskeleton design has been developed and tested. The present study investigated the effect of the SPEXOR passive exoskeleton on compression forces, moments, muscle activity and kinematics during static bending at six hand heights and during lifting of a box of 10 kg from around ankle height using three techniques: Free, Squat and Stoop. For static bending, the exoskeleton reduced the compression force by 13-21% depending on bending angle. Another effect of the exoskeleton was that participants substantially reduced lumbar flexion. While lifting, the exoskeleton reduced the peak compression force, on average, by 14%. Lifting technique did not modify the effect of the exoskeleton such that the reduction in compression force was similar. In conclusion, substantial reductions in compression forces were found as a result of the support generated by the exoskeleton and changes in behavior when wearing the exoskeleton. For static bending, lumbar flexion was reduced with the exoskeleton, indicating reduced passive tissue strain. In addition, the reduced peak compression force could reduce the risk of compression induced tissue failure during lifting.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compression forces; Lifting; Low-back pain; Mechanical loading; Passive exoskeletons; SPEXOR

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32423541     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of Subjective Responses of Low Back Pain Patients and Asymptomatic Controls to Use of Spinal Exoskeleton during Simple Load Lifting Tasks: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Žiga Kozinc; Jan Babič; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Benchmarking Wearable Robots: Challenges and Recommendations From Functional, User Experience, and Methodological Perspectives.

Authors:  Diego Torricelli; Carlos Rodriguez-Guerrero; Jan F Veneman; Simona Crea; Kristin Briem; Bigna Lenggenhager; Philipp Beckerle
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2020-11-13

Review 3.  Towards a Functional Performance Validation Standard for Industrial Low-Back Exoskeletons: State of the Art Review.

Authors:  Mattia Pesenti; Alberto Antonietti; Marta Gandolla; Alessandra Pedrocchi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Evaluation of a Chair-Mounted Passive Trunk Orthosis: A Pilot Study on Able-Bodied Subjects.

Authors:  Ahmad Zahid Rao; Muhammad Abul Hasan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures.

Authors:  Ali Golabchi; Andrew Chao; Mahdi Tavakoli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Biomechanical Analysis of Stoop and Free-Style Squat Lifting and Lowering with a Generic Back-Support Exoskeleton Model.

Authors:  Mark Tröster; Sarah Budde; Christophe Maufroy; Michael Skipper Andersen; John Rasmussen; Urs Schneider; Thomas Bauernhansl
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Evaluation of the HeroWear Apex back-assist exosuit during multiple brief tasks.

Authors:  Maja Goršič; Yu Song; Boyi Dai; Domen Novak
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Passive Trunk Exoskeleton Acceptability and Effects on Self-efficacy in Employees with Low-Back Pain: A Mixed Method Approach.

Authors:  S J Baltrusch; H Houdijk; J H van Dieën; J Th C M de Kruif
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.